Order 4

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM.) 356/25
Rahul Attal Vs. M/S Acex Career Vista LLP
13.11.2025
Present: Sh. Sancheet Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff
alongwith plaintiff.
Sh. Shailender Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the
defendant.
Ld. Counsel for defendant has filed written
statement, application under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC, affidavit
of admission and denial of documents alongwith list of
documents and an application for condonation of delay has been
filed by the defendant.
Heard. File perused.
Vide order dt. 25.09.2025 my Ld. Predecessor has
observed that there was already delay of 170 days from the date
of service. As defendant was served through e-mail on
10.06.2025. The defendant has not denied its service by e-mail
on 10.06.2025. The defendant has not filed WS within the outer
limits of 120 days rather WS has been filed today. There is no
circumstance to condoned the delay for filing of WS.
As such the right of the defendant to file WS is
closed and defence of the defendant is hereby struck off. The
application of defendant under Section 151 CPC for condonation
of delay and application of the plaintiff under Order 8 Rule 10
r/w Section 151 CPC stands disposed off accordingly.
So far as application of the applicant moved under
Section 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC disposed off with the direction that
defendant shall not part with possession of property bearing no.
82, Mall Road, GTB Nagar, Kingsway Camp, Delhi as that
property is the subject matter of rent agreement between
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2-
plaintiff and defendant. The plaintiff claimed himself as owner of
the property and asserted defendant as tenant.
Put up for framing of issues/further proceedings on
18.12.2025.
(JAGDISH KUMAR)
District Judge, Comm. Court-01
North, Rohini Courts, Delhi
13.11.2025
-- 2 of 2 --