CS DJ - CIVIL SUIT FOR DJ ADJ
DEEPAK KUMARVsINDRA BISHT
CNR DLNT010046792025758-District Judge
Rohini North, District Sessions Court
delhi · Delhi (DL)
PENDING
TrustJury record updated 17 Oct 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 261/2025
- Registration Date
- 17 Apr 2025
- Next Hearing Date
- 05 Apr 2027
- Case Stage
- Misc./ Arguments
Advocates
1For Petitioner
For Respondent
Not available
Parties
2Petitioner
Respondent
Acts & Sections
1Civil Cases · Sec SECTION6
Case History / Proceedings
Case History
Date: 17-04-2025 Business: a Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose Next Hearing Date: 20-08-2025 Date: 20-08-2025 Business: fp Next Purpose: Issues Next Hearing Date: 15-12-2025 Date: 15-12-2025 Business: fp Next Purpose: Misc./ Arguments Next Hearing Date: 02-02-2026 Date: 02-02-2026 Business: fp Next Purpose: Misc./ Arguments Next Hearing Date: 18-05-2026 Date: 18-05-2026 Business: fp Next Purpose: Misc./ Arguments Next Hearing Date: 28-09-2026 Date: 28-09-2026 Business: fp Next Purpose: Misc./ Arguments Next Hearing Date: 05-04-2027
Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 3675/2025 Filing Date: 15-04-2025 eFiling Number: ADL20230011350C202500022 eFiling Date: 11-04-2025 First Hearing Date: 17th April 2025 Court Number And Judge: 758-District Judge
Orders
12Interim Order 628 Sept 2026
28 Sept 2026
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 18 CS DJ 261/25 DEEPAK KUMAR Vs. INDRA BISHT 28.09.2026 Present : Mr. Shivam Gupta, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff alongwith plaintiff. Mr. Tarun Chahar, Proxy Counsel for defendant alongwith defendant. Ld. Counsel for plaintiff presses for temporary injunction but adjournment is sought on behalf of defendant submitting that main counsel is out of station. Considering the request, put up for arguments on both the applications on 05.04.2027. Meanwhile, defendant is directed not to create third party interest in the suit property i.e. B-120, First Floor, Block B, Khasra no. 56/22, Prahladpur Banger, Kishan Colony, Delhi and property no. 8/C, Khasra no. 56/22, Kishan Colony, Village Pehladpur Banger, Delhi, by next date. (Aanchal) District Judge-03, Rohini Courts North District, Delhi 28.09.2026 (jy) -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 518 May 2026
18 May 2026
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: CS DJ 261/25 DEEPAK KUMAR Vs. INDRA BISHT 18.05.2026 Present : Plaintiff in person. None for defendant. In the interest of justice, put up for purpose fixed for 28.09.2026. (Aanchal) District Judge-03, Rohini Courts North District, Delhi 18.05.2026 (jy) -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 402 Feb 2026
02 Feb 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 17 CS DJ 261/25 DEEPAK KUMAR Vs. INDRA BISHT 02.02.2026. Present: Mr. Anshil Tyagi, Ld. Proxy counsel for plaintiff. Mr. Sushant, Ld. Counsel for the defendant with defendant. At joint request, put up for purpose fixed for 18.05.2026. (Aanchal) District Judge-03, Rohini Courts North District, Delhi 02.02.2026(amt) -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 315 Dec 2025
15 Dec 2025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 27 CS DJ 261/25 DEEPAK KUMAR Vs. INDRA BISHT 15.12.2025. Present : Mr. Shivam Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff alongwith plaintiff. Ms. Yishi Dabas, Ld. Counsel for the defendant. Fresh vakalatnama is filed on behalf of defendant. Written statement is proposed to be tendered on record. Statutory period after the service to the defendant has already been expired. Accordingly, written statement is not taken on record and defence of the defendant is hereby struck off. Now, reply to the applicatoin u/o 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC and application u/o 7 Rule 11 CPC are taken on record. Copies are supplied today. Let reply to the application u/o 7 Rule 11 CPC be filed after supplying advance copy to the opposite counsel against acknowledgment. Now, put up for arguments on application u/o 7 Rule 11 CPC as well as application u/o 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC for 02.02.2026. (Aanchal) District Judge-03, Rohini Courts North District, Delhi 15.12.2025(amt) -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 220 Aug 2025
20 Aug 2025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 16 CS DJ 261/25 DEEPAK KUMAR Vs. INDRA BISHT 20.08.2025. Present: Sh. Shivam Gupta, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff. Sh. Sushant Chaudhary, Ld. Counsel for defendant. Fresh vakalatnama on behalf of defendant is filed. Documents attached with the plaint are submitted to have not been supplied. Record shows that same were not even sent through postal article. However, without passing any adverse order against the plaintiff, complete set of documents already lying extra on record is supplied to the defendant. Let written statement be filed within statutory period after supplying advance copy to the opposite counsel against acknowledgment and thereafter replication, if any, be filed after supplying advance copy to the opposite counsel against acknowledgment. Now, appearance of parties/admission and denial of the documents, if any/examination u/o 10 CPC/exploration of the chances of resolution of dispute by alternate means and for consideration of issues for 15.12.2025. (Aanchal) District Judge-03, Rohini Courts North District, Delhi 20.08.2025(amt) -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 117 Apr 2025
17 Apr 2025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS DJ 261/25 DEEPAK KUMAR Vs. INDRA BISHT 17.04.2025 Fresh suit received by way of e-filing. Same be checked and registered. Present: Mr. Shivam Gupta, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff along with plaintiff in person. ORDER 1. Physical file filed on behalf of plaintiff. 2. Heard. Issue summons of the present suit to the defendant on filing of PF (within one week) / RC & Speed Post, returnable for 20.08.2025. Shivali Bansal DJ-03, Rohini Courts North District, Delhi 17.04.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 628 Sept 2026
28 Sept 2026
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 18 CS DJ 261/25 DEEPAK KUMAR Vs. INDRA BISHT 28.09.2026 Present : Mr. Shivam Gupta, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff alongwith plaintiff. Mr. Tarun Chahar, Proxy Counsel for defendant alongwith defendant. Ld. Counsel for plaintiff presses for temporary injunction but adjournment is sought on behalf of defendant submitting that main counsel is out of station. Considering the request, put up for arguments on both the applications on 05.04.2027. Meanwhile, defendant is directed not to create third party interest in the suit property i.e. B-120, First Floor, Block B, Khasra no. 56/22, Prahladpur Banger, Kishan Colony, Delhi and property no. 8/C, Khasra no. 56/22, Kishan Colony, Village Pehladpur Banger, Delhi, by next date. (Aanchal) District Judge-03, Rohini Courts North District, Delhi 28.09.2026 (jy) -- 1 of 1 --
Order 518 May 2026
18 May 2026
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: CS DJ 261/25 DEEPAK KUMAR Vs. INDRA BISHT 18.05.2026 Present : Plaintiff in person. None for defendant. In the interest of justice, put up for purpose fixed for 28.09.2026. (Aanchal) District Judge-03, Rohini Courts North District, Delhi 18.05.2026 (jy) -- 1 of 1 --
Order 402 Feb 2026
02 Feb 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 17 CS DJ 261/25 DEEPAK KUMAR Vs. INDRA BISHT 02.02.2026. Present: Mr. Anshil Tyagi, Ld. Proxy counsel for plaintiff. Mr. Sushant, Ld. Counsel for the defendant with defendant. At joint request, put up for purpose fixed for 18.05.2026. (Aanchal) District Judge-03, Rohini Courts North District, Delhi 02.02.2026(amt) -- 1 of 1 --
Order 315 Dec 2025
15 Dec 2025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 27 CS DJ 261/25 DEEPAK KUMAR Vs. INDRA BISHT 15.12.2025. Present : Mr. Shivam Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff alongwith plaintiff. Ms. Yishi Dabas, Ld. Counsel for the defendant. Fresh vakalatnama is filed on behalf of defendant. Written statement is proposed to be tendered on record. Statutory period after the service to the defendant has already been expired. Accordingly, written statement is not taken on record and defence of the defendant is hereby struck off. Now, reply to the applicatoin u/o 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC and application u/o 7 Rule 11 CPC are taken on record. Copies are supplied today. Let reply to the application u/o 7 Rule 11 CPC be filed after supplying advance copy to the opposite counsel against acknowledgment. Now, put up for arguments on application u/o 7 Rule 11 CPC as well as application u/o 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC for 02.02.2026. (Aanchal) District Judge-03, Rohini Courts North District, Delhi 15.12.2025(amt) -- 1 of 1 --
Order 220 Aug 2025
20 Aug 2025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 16 CS DJ 261/25 DEEPAK KUMAR Vs. INDRA BISHT 20.08.2025. Present: Sh. Shivam Gupta, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff. Sh. Sushant Chaudhary, Ld. Counsel for defendant. Fresh vakalatnama on behalf of defendant is filed. Documents attached with the plaint are submitted to have not been supplied. Record shows that same were not even sent through postal article. However, without passing any adverse order against the plaintiff, complete set of documents already lying extra on record is supplied to the defendant. Let written statement be filed within statutory period after supplying advance copy to the opposite counsel against acknowledgment and thereafter replication, if any, be filed after supplying advance copy to the opposite counsel against acknowledgment. Now, appearance of parties/admission and denial of the documents, if any/examination u/o 10 CPC/exploration of the chances of resolution of dispute by alternate means and for consideration of issues for 15.12.2025. (Aanchal) District Judge-03, Rohini Courts North District, Delhi 20.08.2025(amt) -- 1 of 1 --
Order 117 Apr 2025
17 Apr 2025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS DJ 261/25 DEEPAK KUMAR Vs. INDRA BISHT 17.04.2025 Fresh suit received by way of e-filing. Same be checked and registered. Present: Mr. Shivam Gupta, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff along with plaintiff in person. ORDER 1. Physical file filed on behalf of plaintiff. 2. Heard. Issue summons of the present suit to the defendant on filing of PF (within one week) / RC & Speed Post, returnable for 20.08.2025. Shivali Bansal DJ-03, Rohini Courts North District, Delhi 17.04.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
