Final Order 2

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 17 MISC DJ 583/26 Hari Praksah Through Lrs Smt Dhanpati Vs.
UNION OF INDIA(LAC-1129/16, )
12.05.2026
Present: Counsel for applicant.
Sh. Mukesh Kumar, Patwari from the LAC Office.
Arguments heard on the application u/s 152 r/w
Section u/s 151 CPC. Record perused.
Main file has been received.
Perusal of record shows that vide Judgment dated 12.02.2021 this
Court had adjudicated the market value of A Category land of
village Ghoga acquired through award No. 05/1998-99 as Rs.
11,92,000/- per acre. The land of petitioner in the present case is
of B category also. Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in a case titled as
Jai Singh Vs. UOI, LA No.266/08, decided on 23.08.2011 (Delhi
High Court) had adopted/ used a formula for determination of fair
market value of Category B as well as Category C land vis-a-vis
land of Category 'A'. In Jai Singh's case fair market value of
Category B land was adjudicated to be 2.5% less than fair market
value of Category A land and fair market value of C category land
was adjudicated to be 2.5% less than fair market value of Category
B land. I find no impediment in adopting/relying upon the formula
adopted by Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in said case. In fact this
court is under an obligation/duty to follow the orders passed by
Hon'ble High Court of Delhi as well as Hon'ble Supreme Court of
India. On applying the formula adopted/used by Hon'ble High
Court of Delhi in Jai Singh's case (Supra) the fair market value of
category B land of village Barwala acquired by same Notification
Contd...
-- 1 of 3 --
-2-
is calculated to be 2.5% lesser than the market value of category A
land. Hence, the market value of category B land of Village Ghoga
acquired by same Notification is adjudicated to be Rs. 11,62,200/-
per acre.
Hence, the petitioner is entitled to fair market value @
Rs.11,92,000/- per acre for category A land & @ Rs. 11,62,200/-
per acre for 'B' category land, whichever is applicable for the
acquired land as per statement u/s 19 of the LA Act;
The remaining reliefs/ statutory benefits including
rate of interest granted to petitioner vide Award/ judgment dated
12.02.2021 shall remain the same. This order shall form the
integral part of the judgment.
Application in hand stands disposed off accordingly.
Arguments also heard on the application for
correction in the names wherein the surnames were mistakently not
mentioned. The correct names are as under:
i. Dhanpati ii. Vinod Kumar iii. Mukesh Bhardwaj
iv. Deen Dayal Bhardwaj
v. Jitender Kumar (deceased) through LRs:
a. Latesh (Widow)
b. Divyanshi (daughter)
c. Parth (son)
vi. Naveen Kumar Bhardwaj vii. Praveen
The application is supported with the copy of
judgment; their Aadhar Cards and Pan Cards. The application is
accordingly allowed.
This correction order today shall be part of judgment
in question.
Contd....
-- 2 of 3 --
-3-
File be consigned to record room after due
compliance.
Copy of order be given dasti, as requested.
Miscellaneous file be attached with the main file and
be consigned to record-room after necessary compliance.
(Sidharth Mathur)
District Judge-01(N)/Rohini
Courts Delhi/12.05.2026/ak
-- 3 of 3 --