Skip to main content
CS DJ - CIVIL SUIT FOR DJ ADJ

Madan Lal GuptaVsShree Ram Auto Mall India Limited +13 more

CNR DLNT010041982024761-District Judge
Rohini North, District Sessions Court
delhi · Delhi (DL)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--WITHDRAWN
Decision Date: 26th March 2025

TrustJury record updated 17 Oct 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
248/2024
Registration Date
22 Mar 2024

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    15

    Petitioner

    1. 1Madan Lal Gupta

    Respondent

    1. 1Shree Ram Auto Mall India Limited
    2. 2UMESH GOVIND REVANKAR
    3. 3VINAY VINOD SANGHI
    4. 4Kishori Jayendra Udeshi
    5. 5AKSHAY SHANKER
    6. 6LAKSHMINARAYANAN SUBRAMANIAN
    7. 7VIKRAM AMARNATH ALVA
    8. 8ANEESHA BHANDARY
    9. 9REEMA PRAFULCHANDRA DESAI
    10. 10WAGESH CHATURVEDI
    11. 11NEHA JAIN
    12. 12Jay
    13. 13NEHA BADHURIA
    14. 14Rakesh

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Suit for Recovery · Sec 514

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 23-03-2024
Business: fp
Next Purpose: Proper Order
Next Hearing Date: 05-06-2024

Date: 05-06-2024
Business: fp
Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose
Next Hearing Date: 18-09-2024

Date: 18-09-2024
Business: fp
Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose
Next Hearing Date: 26-11-2024

Date: 26-11-2024
Business: fp
Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose
Next Hearing Date: 26-03-2025

Date: 26-03-2025
Business: rr
Nature Of Disposal: WITHDRAWN
Disposal Date: 26-03-2025

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 3167/2024
Filing Date: 21-03-2024
eFiling Number: ADL20240001036C202400015
eFiling Date: 19-03-2024
First Hearing Date: 23rd March 2024
Decision Date: 26th March 2025
Court Number And Judge: 761-District Judge

    Orders

    9
    Final Order 5
    26 Mar 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS DJ 248/24
Madan Lal Gupta Vs. Shree Ram Auto Mall India Limited
26.03.2025
Present: Sh. Sumeet, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Chandragupt, Ld. Counsel for all defendants,
through VC.
It is submitted by Ld. Counsel for plaintiff that he
has got instructions from the plaintiff to withdraw the present suit
on technical grounds with liberty to file afresh as per law.
Ld. Counsel for defendants submits that he has no
objection if the present case is withdrawn by the plaintiff.
Heard.
Let statement of Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff be
recorded.
Statement of Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff is recorded
separately and in view of the same, present case stands dismissed
as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh, as per law.
File be consigned to record room.
(Kishor Kumar)
DJ-04, North, Rohini Courts,
Delhi/26.03.2025
-- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 4
    26 Nov 2024
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS DJ 248/24
Madan Lal Gupta Vs. Shree Ram Auto Mall India Limited
26.11.24
Present: Sh. Kamaldeep, Ld. Proxy Counsel for plaintiff.
None is appearing on behalf of defendants since
morning despite calls.
For today, the plaintiff is supposed to file
rejoinder/reply to the application filed under Order I Rule 10
CPC on behalf of the defendants, however, it is submitted by Ld.
Proxy Counsel for plaintiff that today main counsel is busy in
training of DLSA.
Heard.
In the interest of justice, last and final opportunity is
granted to file rejoinder/reply to the aforesaid application with
advance copy to Ld. Counsel for defendants.
Put up the case for arguments on application under
Order I Rule 10 CPC, for 26.03.2025.
(Kishor Kumar)
DJ-04, North, Rohini Courts,
Delhi/26.11.24.
-- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 3
    18 Sept 2024
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS DJ 248/24
Madan Lal Gupta Vs. Shree Ram Auto Mall India Limited
18.09.24
Present: Sh Kamaldeep, ld counsel for plaintiff.
Sh Prashant Parihar, ld counsel for all the defendants
except defendant no.2.
Sh Mahender Singh, ld counsel for defendant no.2
with AR Sh Yatitender Mohan in person.
Ld counsel for plaintiff seeks some time to file
replication as well as reply to the applications u/o I Rule 10 CPC
filed on behalf of defendants alongwith one application for
condonation of delay in filing the written statement as well as
another application u/s 8 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act.
Let rejoinder/reply to the aforesaid application be
filed by and on behalf of plaintiff with advance copy to ld
counsel for the defendants and for arguments on the same, for
26.11.24.
(Kishor Kumar)
DJ-04, North, Rohini Courts,
Delhi/18.09.24
-- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 2
    05 Jun 2024
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS DJ 248/24
Madan Lal Gupta Vs. Shree Ram Auto Mall India Limited
05.06.24
Present: Sh Sumit, ld counsel for plaintiff.
Sh Raju Mishra, ld counsel for defendant no.1.
Sh Mahender Singh and Sh Yatinder Mohan, ld
counsel for defendant no.2.
None for remaining defendants.
Memo of appearance has been filed on behalf of
defendant no.2.
Copy of plaint alongwith documents has been
supplied to ld counsel for both the defendants.
Put up the case for filing of written statements on
behalf of all the defendants within 30 days from today, with
advance copy to ld counsel for the plaintiff, for 18.09.24.
(Kishor Kumar)
DJ-04, North, Rohini Courts,
Delhi/05.06.24.
-- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 1
    23 Mar 2024
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS DJ 248/24
MADAN LAL GUPTA VS SHREE RAM AUTO MALL INDIA LTD.
Fresh suit received by way of assignment. It be checked and
registered.
Present: Sh Sumit, ld counsel for the plaintiff.
Let summons for settlement of issues be issued to
the defendant on filing of PF/RC, returnable for 05.06.24.
Steps be taken within one week.
(Kishor Kumar)
ADJ-04, North, Rohini Courts,
Delhi/23.03.24
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 4
    26 Nov 2024
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS DJ 248/24
Madan Lal Gupta Vs. Shree Ram Auto Mall India Limited
26.11.24
Present: Sh. Kamaldeep, Ld. Proxy Counsel for plaintiff.
None is appearing on behalf of defendants since
morning despite calls.
For today, the plaintiff is supposed to file
rejoinder/reply to the application filed under Order I Rule 10
CPC on behalf of the defendants, however, it is submitted by Ld.
Proxy Counsel for plaintiff that today main counsel is busy in
training of DLSA.
Heard.
In the interest of justice, last and final opportunity is
granted to file rejoinder/reply to the aforesaid application with
advance copy to Ld. Counsel for defendants.
Put up the case for arguments on application under
Order I Rule 10 CPC, for 26.03.2025.
(Kishor Kumar)
DJ-04, North, Rohini Courts,
Delhi/26.11.24.
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 3
    18 Sept 2024
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS DJ 248/24
Madan Lal Gupta Vs. Shree Ram Auto Mall India Limited
18.09.24
Present: Sh Kamaldeep, ld counsel for plaintiff.
Sh Prashant Parihar, ld counsel for all the defendants
except defendant no.2.
Sh Mahender Singh, ld counsel for defendant no.2
with AR Sh Yatitender Mohan in person.
Ld counsel for plaintiff seeks some time to file
replication as well as reply to the applications u/o I Rule 10 CPC
filed on behalf of defendants alongwith one application for
condonation of delay in filing the written statement as well as
another application u/s 8 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act.
Let rejoinder/reply to the aforesaid application be
filed by and on behalf of plaintiff with advance copy to ld
counsel for the defendants and for arguments on the same, for
26.11.24.
(Kishor Kumar)
DJ-04, North, Rohini Courts,
Delhi/18.09.24
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 2
    05 Jun 2024
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS DJ 248/24
Madan Lal Gupta Vs. Shree Ram Auto Mall India Limited
05.06.24
Present: Sh Sumit, ld counsel for plaintiff.
Sh Raju Mishra, ld counsel for defendant no.1.
Sh Mahender Singh and Sh Yatinder Mohan, ld
counsel for defendant no.2.
None for remaining defendants.
Memo of appearance has been filed on behalf of
defendant no.2.
Copy of plaint alongwith documents has been
supplied to ld counsel for both the defendants.
Put up the case for filing of written statements on
behalf of all the defendants within 30 days from today, with
advance copy to ld counsel for the plaintiff, for 18.09.24.
(Kishor Kumar)
DJ-04, North, Rohini Courts,
Delhi/05.06.24.
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 1
    23 Mar 2024
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS DJ 248/24
MADAN LAL GUPTA VS SHREE RAM AUTO MALL INDIA LTD.
Fresh suit received by way of assignment. It be checked and
registered.
Present: Sh Sumit, ld counsel for the plaintiff.
Let summons for settlement of issues be issued to
the defendant on filing of PF/RC, returnable for 05.06.24.
Steps be taken within one week.
(Kishor Kumar)
ADJ-04, North, Rohini Courts,
Delhi/23.03.24
-- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.