M/s Bharti EnterprisesVsM/s Vanshika Enterprises

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM.) 138/24
M/s Bharti Enterprises Vs. M/S Vanshika Enterprises
12.08.2026
Present: None.
Be awaited.
(JAGDISH KUMAR)
District Judge, Comm. Court-01
North, Rohini Courts, Delhi
12.08.2026
At second call
Present: None.
Be awaited.
(JAGDISH KUMAR)
District Judge, Comm. Court-01
North, Rohini Courts, Delhi
12.08.2026
In post lunch sessions
Present: None.
It is already 3:10 pm and third call since morning. It
is noted that none has appeared on behalf of the plaintiff today as
well as on last date of hearing. It appears that the plaintiff is not
interested in pursuing the matter.
The suit is dismissed in default for non-appearance.
File be consigned to the record room.
(JAGDISH KUMAR)
District Judge, Comm. Court-01
North, Rohini Courts, Delhi
12.08.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 20 CS (COMM.) 138/24
M/S BHARTI ENTERPRISES VS. M/S VANSHIKA
ENTERPRISES
06.05.2026
Present: None for the plaintiff.
Defendant is already ex-parte vide order dated
05.12.2024.
Be awaited for plaintiff.
(JAGDISH KUMAR)
District Judge, Comm. Court-01
North, Rohini Courts, Delhi
06.05.2026
At 2.10PM
Present: None for the plaintiff.
Defendant is already ex-parte vide order dated
05.12.2024.
Despite several calls since morning, none has turned
up on behalf of the plaintiff. Accordingly, PE stands closed.
Now to come up for ex-parte final arguments on
12.08.2026.
(JAGDISH KUMAR)
District Judge, Comm. Court-01
North, Rohini Courts, Delhi
06.05.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 20 CS (COMM.) 138/24
M/S BHARTI ENTERPRISES VS. M/S VANSHIKA
ENTERPRISES
06.05.2026
Present: None for the plaintiff.
Defendant is already ex-parte vide order dated
05.12.2024.
Be awaited for plaintiff.
(JAGDISH KUMAR)
District Judge, Comm. Court-01
North, Rohini Courts, Delhi
06.05.2026
At 2.10PM
Present: None for the plaintiff.
Defendant is already ex-parte vide order dated
05.12.2024.
Despite several calls since morning, none has turned
up on behalf of the plaintiff. Accordingly, PE stands closed.
Now to come up for ex-parte final arguments on
12.08.2026.
(JAGDISH KUMAR)
District Judge, Comm. Court-01
North, Rohini Courts, Delhi
06.05.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM.) 138/24
M/s Bharti Enterprises Vs. M/S Vanshika Enterprises
23.02.2026
Present: None for the plaintiff.
None for the defendant.
Be awaited.
(JAGDISH KUMAR)
District Judge, Comm. Court-01
North, Rohini Courts, Delhi
23.02.2026
At 11:30 AM
Present: Sh. Sparsh Bagga, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
None for the defendant.
Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff placed on record certain
whatsapp chats, through E-mail and physical copy has also been
placed on the record.
Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the plaintiff has
submitted that he has also informed the plaintiff about the same.
In the present case, evidence is yet to be concluded.
In the given circumstances, one last and final
opportunity is granted to the plaintiff to conclude the evidence,
subject to cost of Rs. 5,000/- imposed upon the plaintiff qua non
production of evidence.
Put up for PE on 06.05.2026.
(JAGDISH KUMAR)
District Judge, Comm. Court-01
North, Rohini Courts, Delhi
23.02.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM.) 138/24
M/s Bharti Enterprises Vs. M/S Vanshika Enterprises
23.02.2026
Present: None for the plaintiff.
None for the defendant.
Be awaited.
(JAGDISH KUMAR)
District Judge, Comm. Court-01
North, Rohini Courts, Delhi
23.02.2026
At 11:30 AM
Present: Sh. Sparsh Bagga, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
None for the defendant.
Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff placed on record certain
whatsapp chats, through E-mail and physical copy has also been
placed on the record.
Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the plaintiff has
submitted that he has also informed the plaintiff about the same.
In the present case, evidence is yet to be concluded.
In the given circumstances, one last and final
opportunity is granted to the plaintiff to conclude the evidence,
subject to cost of Rs. 5,000/- imposed upon the plaintiff qua non
production of evidence.
Put up for PE on 06.05.2026.
(JAGDISH KUMAR)
District Judge, Comm. Court-01
North, Rohini Courts, Delhi
23.02.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM.) 138/24
M/s Bharti Enterprises Vs M/S Vanshika Enterprises
12.01.2026
Present: Sh. Sparsh Bagga, Counsel for plaintiff.
Defendant is already ex-parte.
Adjournment has been sought on behalf of the
plaintiff to conclude PE as plaintiff is not available today being
out of station.
Heard. Considered. Allowed.
Put up on 23.02.2026 for PE.
(JAGDISH KUMAR)
District Judge, Comm. Court-01
North, Rohini Courts, Delhi
12.01.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM.) 138/24
M/s Bharti Enterprises Vs M/S Vanshika Enterprises
12.01.2026
Present: Sh. Sparsh Bagga, Counsel for plaintiff.
Defendant is already ex-parte.
Adjournment has been sought on behalf of the
plaintiff to conclude PE as plaintiff is not available today being
out of station.
Heard. Considered. Allowed.
Put up on 23.02.2026 for PE.
(JAGDISH KUMAR)
District Judge, Comm. Court-01
North, Rohini Courts, Delhi
12.01.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (Comm) 138/24
M/s Bharti Enterprises Vs. M/s Vanshika Enterprises
03.11.2025
Present: Sh. Sparsh Bagga, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Defendant is already ex-parte vide order dated
05.12.2024.
Ld. Counsel for petitioner sought adjournment on
the ground that petitioner is unable to trace out the original
documents. Heard. File perused.
One more opportunity is given to the petitioner to
lead evidence.
Put up for PE/further examination of PW1 on
12.01.2026.
(JAGDISH KUMAR)
District Judge, Comm. Court-01
North, Rohini Courts, Delhi
03.11.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (Comm) 138/24
M/s Bharti Enterprises Vs. M/s Vanshika Enterprises
03.11.2025
Present: Sh. Sparsh Bagga, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Defendant is already ex-parte vide order dated
05.12.2024.
Ld. Counsel for petitioner sought adjournment on
the ground that petitioner is unable to trace out the original
documents. Heard. File perused.
One more opportunity is given to the petitioner to
lead evidence.
Put up for PE/further examination of PW1 on
12.01.2026.
(JAGDISH KUMAR)
District Judge, Comm. Court-01
North, Rohini Courts, Delhi
03.11.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM.) No. 138/24
M/s Bharti Enterprises Vs. M/S Vanshika Enterprises
01.09.2025
Present: Sh. Sparsh Bagga, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Defendant is already ex-parte vide order dated
05.12.2024.
Proof of payment of cost has been filed.
PW-1 is present, but he has not brought the original
documents today. He is directed to bring all the original
documents on the next date of hearing.
Put up for further examination of PW-1 and RPE, if
any, on 03.11.2025.
(AMIT KUMAR)
District Judge, Comm. Court-01
North, Rohini Courts, Delhi
01.09.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM.) No. 138/24
M/s Bharti Enterprises Vs. M/S Vanshika Enterprises
01.09.2025
Present: Sh. Sparsh Bagga, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Defendant is already ex-parte vide order dated
05.12.2024.
Proof of payment of cost has been filed.
PW-1 is present, but he has not brought the original
documents today. He is directed to bring all the original
documents on the next date of hearing.
Put up for further examination of PW-1 and RPE, if
any, on 03.11.2025.
(AMIT KUMAR)
District Judge, Comm. Court-01
North, Rohini Courts, Delhi
01.09.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM.) No. 138/24
M/s Bharti Enterprises Vs. M/S Vanshika Enterprises
11.08.2025
Present: Sh. Roshan, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Defendant is already ex-parte vide order dated
05.12.2024.
Ld. Proxy counsel submits that he has already paid
the previous cost.
Matter is listed for PE.
Adjournment sought on the ground that the witness
is out of station.
Infacts, put up for purpose fixed on 01.09.2025.
Receipt of cost of Rs. 5000/- be also produced on the date fixed.
(AMIT KUMAR)
District Judge, Comm. Court-01
North, Rohini Courts, Delhi
11.08.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM.) No. 138/24
M/s Bharti Enterprises Vs. M/S Vanshika Enterprises
11.08.2025
Present: Sh. Roshan, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Defendant is already ex-parte vide order dated
05.12.2024.
Ld. Proxy counsel submits that he has already paid
the previous cost.
Matter is listed for PE.
Adjournment sought on the ground that the witness
is out of station.
Infacts, put up for purpose fixed on 01.09.2025.
Receipt of cost of Rs. 5000/- be also produced on the date fixed.
(AMIT KUMAR)
District Judge, Comm. Court-01
North, Rohini Courts, Delhi
11.08.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM.) No. 138/24
M/s Bharti Enterprises Vs. M/S Vanshika Enterprises
09.07.2025
Present: Sh. Sparsh Bagga, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Defendant is already ex-parte vide order dated
05.12.2024.
An application U/o 18 Rule 17 CPC has been filed
by the plaintiff seeking permission to re-examine himself to
prove the invoices. It is stated that original invoices could not be
filed earlier as the same were not available and photocopies on
record could not be exhibited.
Though on merits, there is no reason to allow this
application, yet in the interest of justice subject to cost of Rs.
5000/- to be deposited with DLSA North, the plaintiff is
permitted to re-examine himself only in respect of invoices.
Cost paid.
On request, put up for PE on 11.08.2025.
(AMIT KUMAR)
District Judge, Comm. Court-01
North, Rohini Courts, Delhi
09.07.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM.) No. 138/24
M/s Bharti Enterprises Vs. M/S Vanshika Enterprises
09.07.2025
Present: Sh. Sparsh Bagga, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Defendant is already ex-parte vide order dated
05.12.2024.
An application U/o 18 Rule 17 CPC has been filed
by the plaintiff seeking permission to re-examine himself to
prove the invoices. It is stated that original invoices could not be
filed earlier as the same were not available and photocopies on
record could not be exhibited.
Though on merits, there is no reason to allow this
application, yet in the interest of justice subject to cost of Rs.
5000/- to be deposited with DLSA North, the plaintiff is
permitted to re-examine himself only in respect of invoices.
Cost paid.
On request, put up for PE on 11.08.2025.
(AMIT KUMAR)
District Judge, Comm. Court-01
North, Rohini Courts, Delhi
09.07.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM.) No. 138/24
M/s Bharti Enterprises Vs. M/S Vanshika Enterprises
26.03.2025
Present: Sh. Sparsh Bagga, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Defendant is already ex-parte vide order dated
05.12.2024.
Further final arguments heard.
Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff seeks some time to take
appropriate steps to place on record the original invoices.
On request, put up for further final arguments on
09.07.2025.
(AMIT KUMAR)
District Judge, Comm. Court-01
North, Rohini Courts, Delhi
26.03.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM.) No. 138/24
M/s Bharti Enterprises Vs. M/S Vanshika Enterprises
26.03.2025
Present: Sh. Sparsh Bagga, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Defendant is already ex-parte vide order dated
05.12.2024.
Further final arguments heard.
Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff seeks some time to take
appropriate steps to place on record the original invoices.
On request, put up for further final arguments on
09.07.2025.
(AMIT KUMAR)
District Judge, Comm. Court-01
North, Rohini Courts, Delhi
26.03.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM.) No. 138/24
M/s Bharti Enterprises Vs. M/S Vanshika Enterprises
Present: Sh. Rajan Chaudhary, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff
through VC.
Sh. Roshan, Ld. Proxy counsel for the plaintiff.
Defendant is already ex-parte vide order dated
05.12.2024.
Final arguments heard partly.
Be put up for further final arguments on 26.03.2025.
(AMIT KUMAR)
District Judge, Comm. Court-01
North, Rohini Courts, Delhi
11.02.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM.) No. 138/24
M/s Bharti Enterprises Vs. M/S Vanshika Enterprises
Present: Sh. Rajan Chaudhary, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff
through VC.
Sh. Roshan, Ld. Proxy counsel for the plaintiff.
Defendant is already ex-parte vide order dated
05.12.2024.
Final arguments heard partly.
Be put up for further final arguments on 26.03.2025.
(AMIT KUMAR)
District Judge, Comm. Court-01
North, Rohini Courts, Delhi
11.02.2025
-- 1 of 1 --