Full Order Text
Order 25 · 25 Jul 2026 · CNR DLNT010021412025
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 33 1A/03/2026 SC 106/2025 PS CRIME BRANCH FIR NO. 162/2024 STATE V/S PRADEEP KUMAR 25.07.2026 This is an application under Section 483 BNSS for grant of regular bail moved on behalf of accused/applicant Pradeep Kumar. Present: Dr. Raj Rani, Ld. Addl. PP for the State. Counsel for the applicant/accused. Present bail application is filed by the applicant in the instant FIR No.162/2024, PS Crime Branch, registered under Section 20/25/29 NDPS Act. ARGUMENTS ON BEHALF OF ACCUSED/APPLICANT 1. It is argued on behalf of accused/applicant that he is the sole bread earner in his family, having clean antecedent, falsely implicated in this case and he was arrested on 28.08.2024 and since then, he is behind bars. It is further argued that investigation is complete as charge sheet has been filed. It is further argued that the applicant is alleged to have transported 120.07 kg of marijuana /ganja in a truck along with co-accused Sahab Singh. It is further argued that present applicant is not an owner of the said Truck but he was a helper and was working in an industry. It is further argued that there was no communication between the present applicant and the co-accused person and there is no money trial between them, hence, the concession of bail should be granted to the applicant as conclusion of trial will take significant time. Hence, it is prayed that accused/applicant should be -- 1 of 3 -- released on bail as he is ready to abide with any condition imposed by the court. ARGUMENTS ON BEHALF OF STATE 2. Per contra, Ld. Addl. PP for the State has vehemently opposed the bail application stating that applicant/accused along with co-accused Sahab Singh was arrested with recovery of commercial quantity of the contraband i.e. 120.07 Kg. of Marijuana (Ganja) in a Truck while they both were transporting the said contraband. It is further argued that since there is involvement of commercial quantity of the contraband from the joint possession of the applicant along with other accused person, therefore, bar of Section 37 of NDPS Act is attracted in this matter, hence, bail should not be granted to the applicant. It is further argued that accused/applicant is involved in drug trafficking. The allegations against the accused/applicant are serious in nature and there is every likelihood that accused/applicant may commit further offence of similar nature, if he be released on bail. 3. Submissions heard. Record perused. FINDINGS/CONCLUSION 4. Allegations against accused/applicant are serious in nature as applicant was arrested with commercial quantity of the contraband i.e. 120.07 Kg. of Marijuana (Ganja) on the basis of a secret information received by the IO. Since, it is an admitted position that commercial quantity of the contraband is alleged to have been recovered from the joint possession of the applicant along with other co-accused, therefore, bar of Section 37 of NDPS Act is attracted in this matter. However, no arguments were addressed qua twin test laid down under Section 37 -- 2 of 3 -- NDPS Act and in the absence of any substantial arguments on Section 37 NDPS Act, the present application cannot be allowed. Therefore, there is no merit in the argument raised by the Counsel for the applicant. Hence, I do not find any reason to exercise discretion in favour of accused/applicant. 5. In view of the above facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the considered view that no ground is made out for grant of bail to accused/applicant Pradeep Kumar. Therefore, the application moved on behalf of the accused/applicant Pradeep Kumar stands dismissed. Nothing in this order shall tantamount to an expression of opinion on the merits of the case during trial. Pursuant to directions issued by Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in SMWP (Criminal) No. 4/2021 titled as In Re Policy Strategy for Grant of Bail as well as in compliance of judgment titled as Ajay Verma Vs. State, copy of this order be sent to Jail Superintendent through e- mail. Copy of this order be given dasti, as prayed for. Harvinder Singh Johal Spl. Judge(NDPS)/ASJ North Distt., Rohini Courts, Delhi/25.07.2026( j) -- 3 of 3 --
