Interim Order 6

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: FIR No. 162/2024
	PS Crime Branch
	State Vs. Pradeep
1/2
IA No. 01-2025
SC No. 106-2025
State vs. Pradeep
FIR No. 162/2024
PS Crime Branch
U/Sec. 20/25/29 NDPS Act
09.06.2025
This is an application under section 483 BNSS for grant of interim
bail filed on behalf of applicant/accused Pradeep.
Present: Dr. Raj Rani, Ld. Addl. PP for the State.
Sh. Bharat Joshi, Ld. Counsel for the
applicant/accused.
Reply to the application filed. Copy supplied.
ARGUMENTS ON BEHALF OF ACCUSED/APPLICANT
1. It is argued on behalf of accused/applicant that mother of
accused/applicant is suffering from cataract diseases and she is started
losing her eye sight. It is further submitted with the help of neighbour,
mother of accused/applicant visited eye surgeon for check up and
doctor has advised her for immediate operation of right eye. It is
further submitted that there is no other family member, who can take
care mother of accused/applicant during surgery and post surgery as
father of accused/applicant is also suffering from liver disease and he
is completely bed ridden. Hence, it is prayed that accused/applicant be
released on 30 days as he is ready to abide with any condition
imposed by the court.
ARGUMENTS ON BEHALF OF STATE
2. Per contra, Ld. Addl. PP for the State has vehemently
opposed the bail application stating that medical documents annexed
-- 1 of 2 --
FIR No. 162/2024
	PS Crime Branch
	State Vs. Pradeep
2/2
by accused/applicant have been verified, however, no date of surgery
has been given by the doctor till date.
Submissions heard. Record perused.
FINDINGS/CONCLUSION
3.1 Mother of accused/applicant is suffering from cataract.
Medical documents of mother of accused/applicant have been verified
as she is taking treatment from Bhagwan Das Hospital, however, till
date surgery has not been fixed by the doctor.
3.2 Considering the involvement of accused/applicant, there
is every is every likelihood that accused/applicant may again involved
himself in further criminal activities, if he be released on bail.
3.3 In view of the above facts and circumstances of the case,
I am of the considered view that no ground is made out for grant of
bail to accused/applicant Pradeep. Therefore, the application moved
on behalf of the accused/applicant Pradeep stands dismissed.
Nothing in this order shall tantamount to an expression
of opinion on the merits of the case during trial.
Pursuant to directions issued by Hon’ble Supreme Court
of India in SMWP (Criminal) No. 4/2021 titled as In Re Policy
Strategy for Grant of Bail as well as in compliance of judgment titled
as Ajay Verma Vs. State, copy of this order be sent to Jail
Superintendent through e-mail.
Copy of this order be given dasti as prayed for.
Dhirendra Rana
Spl. Judge, ASJ (NDPS)
North Distt., Rohini Courts,
Delhi. 09.06.2025
-- 2 of 2 --