Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 11 CS DJ 162/26 MANOJ Vs. MOHIT AGGARWAL
28.09.2026
Present: Sh. PK Dixit, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff (through
VC).
Sh. Madhav Kumar Ld. Counsel for defendant
1. Sometime is sought by Ld. Counsel for plaintiff to argue
the application u/o 7 Rule 11 CPC. No reply has been
filed to the said application.
2. Perusal of the plaint reveals that two prayers have been
made by the plaintiff. One is seeking directions to restrain
the defendants from interfering into the peaceful
possession of the suit property. Second seeking declration
with respect to the suit proptery that the plaintiff is the
owner of the suit property.
3. Ld. Counsel for plaintiff submits that the plaintiff has
been dispossessed from the suit property, thus, the prayer
no.1 qua the permanent injunction is now infrunctuos.
4. In any case simplicitor suit for declaration without
possession is not maintainable.
5. As a matter of last and final opportunity, one more
opportunity is granted to the address the arguments on the
aforesaid application.
6. Put up for arguments on application u/o 7 Rule 11 CPC
on 04.12.2026
(Akbar Siddique)
DJ-04, North, Rohini Courts,
Delhi/28.09.2026
-- 1 of 1 --
