Shri Parveen KumarVsMohd Izrahul Haq

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 14 CS DJ 72/25 Shri Parveen Kumar Vs. Mohd Izrahul Haq
14.10.2026
Present: Dr. VP Singh and SH. Mohit, Ld. Counsel for
plaintiff
Sh. Rajesh Hooda, Ld. Counsel for D2.
1. Cost of Rs. 2000/- imposed upon D2 not paid. Same be
paid on NDOH.
2. Matter is listed for PE.
3. Evidence affidavit of PW1 and PW2 filed. Copy supplied
to opposite party
4. PW1 is examined in chief and cross examination is
deferred at the request of Ld. Counsel for defendant
5. Put up for cross examination of PW1 on 24.02.2027
(Akbar Siddique)
DJ-04, North, Rohini Courts,
Delhi/14.10.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 14 CS DJ 72/25 Shri Parveen Kumar Vs. Mohd Izrahul Haq
14.10.2026
Present: Dr. VP Singh and SH. Mohit, Ld. Counsel for
plaintiff
Sh. Rajesh Hooda, Ld. Counsel for D2.
1. Cost of Rs. 2000/- imposed upon D2 not paid. Same be
paid on NDOH.
2. Matter is listed for PE.
3. Evidence affidavit of PW1 and PW2 filed. Copy supplied
to opposite party
4. PW1 is examined in chief and cross examination is
deferred at the request of Ld. Counsel for defendant
5. Put up for cross examination of PW1 on 24.02.2027
(Akbar Siddique)
DJ-04, North, Rohini Courts,
Delhi/14.10.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 10 CS DJ 72/25 Shri Parveen Kumar Vs. Mohd Izrahul Haq
08.04.2026
Present: Dr V.P Singh Sh. Mohit and Sh Atul Kumar, Ld
counsels for the plaintiff.
Sh Rajesh Hooda, Ld Counsel for D2 along with D2.
D1 is already exparte vide order dt. 04.02.2026
1. The WS was filed on behalf of D2 on 12.11.2025 but
inadvertently, the application u/o 8 Rule 1 CPC seeking
condonation of delay of 57 days in filing the WS was not
filed by D2.
2. Today, an application u/o 8 Rule 1 CPC seeking
condonation of delay of 57 days in filing the WS. Copy
supplied to the opposite party.
3. Keeping in view the mandate of Hon’ble Supreme Court in
Kailash Vs. Nankhu & Salem Advocates Bar Association
Vs. Union of India the mandate of Order 8 Rule 1 CPC is
directory in nature and the delay can be condoned.
Therefore, the application stands allowed, subject to
payment of Rs. 2,000/- to be paid to the plaintiff on
NDOH.
4. Put up for framing of issues on 22.07.2026
(Akbar Siddique)
DJ-04, North, Rohini Courts,
Delhi-08.04.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 10 CS DJ 72/25 Shri Parveen Kumar Vs. Mohd Izrahul Haq
08.04.2026
Present: Dr V.P Singh Sh. Mohit and Sh Atul Kumar, Ld
counsels for the plaintiff.
Sh Rajesh Hooda, Ld Counsel for D2 along with D2.
D1 is already exparte vide order dt. 04.02.2026
1. The WS was filed on behalf of D2 on 12.11.2025 but
inadvertently, the application u/o 8 Rule 1 CPC seeking
condonation of delay of 57 days in filing the WS was not
filed by D2.
2. Today, an application u/o 8 Rule 1 CPC seeking
condonation of delay of 57 days in filing the WS. Copy
supplied to the opposite party.
3. Keeping in view the mandate of Hon’ble Supreme Court in
Kailash Vs. Nankhu & Salem Advocates Bar Association
Vs. Union of India the mandate of Order 8 Rule 1 CPC is
directory in nature and the delay can be condoned.
Therefore, the application stands allowed, subject to
payment of Rs. 2,000/- to be paid to the plaintiff on
NDOH.
4. Put up for framing of issues on 22.07.2026
(Akbar Siddique)
DJ-04, North, Rohini Courts,
Delhi-08.04.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS DJ 72/25
Shri Parveen Kumar Vs. Mohd Izrahul Haq
04.02.2026
Present: Dr V.P Singh and Sh Atul Kumar, Ld Counsels for
the plaintiff.
Sh Rajesh Hooda, Ld Counsel for D2.
None for D1.
Perusal of record reveals that D1 is not appearing in
the present case neither any WS has been filed on record by D1.
From the conduct of D1/ Mohd Izrahul Haq, it is
evidently clear that D1 is not interested in contesting the present
suit. Accordingly, D1 is hereby proceeded ex parte.
Ld Counsel for D2 submits that he would be e-filing
an application under order VIII Rule 1 CPC seeking condonation
of delay in filing the WS and advance copy of the same has
already been supplied to the counsel for the plaintiff.
Let the aforesaid application be e-filed within two
days and hard copy be also placed on record.
List the matter for further proceedings on
08.04.2026.
(Ravinder Singh II)
DJ-04, North, Rohini Courts,
Delhi/04.02.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS DJ 72/25
Shri Parveen Kumar Vs. Mohd Izrahul Haq
04.02.2026
Present: Dr V.P Singh and Sh Atul Kumar, Ld Counsels for
the plaintiff.
Sh Rajesh Hooda, Ld Counsel for D2.
None for D1.
Perusal of record reveals that D1 is not appearing in
the present case neither any WS has been filed on record by D1.
From the conduct of D1/ Mohd Izrahul Haq, it is
evidently clear that D1 is not interested in contesting the present
suit. Accordingly, D1 is hereby proceeded ex parte.
Ld Counsel for D2 submits that he would be e-filing
an application under order VIII Rule 1 CPC seeking condonation
of delay in filing the WS and advance copy of the same has
already been supplied to the counsel for the plaintiff.
Let the aforesaid application be e-filed within two
days and hard copy be also placed on record.
List the matter for further proceedings on
08.04.2026.
(Ravinder Singh II)
DJ-04, North, Rohini Courts,
Delhi/04.02.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS DJ 72/25
Shri Parveen Kumar Vs. Mohd Izrahul HaqIssues
12.11.2025
Present: Sh Mohit, Ld Counsel for the plaintiff.
D1 is absent.
None for D1
D2 in person.
D2 submits that on the last date of hearing, it was
inadvertently written that WS has been e-filed by D1 whereas D2
had filed the same. The same stands corrected.
Today replication to the WS of D2 has been filed by
the Plaintiff. Same is taken on record. Copy supplied.
Record further reveals that D1 appeared before the
court on last date of hearing and sought time for engaging a
counsel.
Today D1 is not present in the court and neither any
appearance has been put on his behalf.
In the interest of justice, no adverse steps are being
taken against the D1.
List the matter for appearance of D1 and for further
proceedings on 04.02.2026.
(Ravinder Singh II)
DJ-04, North, Rohini Courts,
Delhi/12.11.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS DJ 72/25
Shri Parveen Kumar Vs. Mohd Izrahul HaqIssues
12.11.2025
Present: Sh Mohit, Ld Counsel for the plaintiff.
D1 is absent.
None for D1
D2 in person.
D2 submits that on the last date of hearing, it was
inadvertently written that WS has been e-filed by D1 whereas D2
had filed the same. The same stands corrected.
Today replication to the WS of D2 has been filed by
the Plaintiff. Same is taken on record. Copy supplied.
Record further reveals that D1 appeared before the
court on last date of hearing and sought time for engaging a
counsel.
Today D1 is not present in the court and neither any
appearance has been put on his behalf.
In the interest of justice, no adverse steps are being
taken against the D1.
List the matter for appearance of D1 and for further
proceedings on 04.02.2026.
(Ravinder Singh II)
DJ-04, North, Rohini Courts,
Delhi/12.11.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS DJ 72/25
Shri Parveen Kumar Vs. Mohd Izrahul Haq
10.09.2025
Present: Dr. V.P. Singh, Sh. Mohit and Sh. Atul Kumar, Ld.
Counsels for the plaintiff.
D1 in person.
Ms. Anshul, Ld. Counsel for the D2 along with D2.
WS has been e-filed by the defendant no.1. Hard
copy placed on record. Copy also supplied to the plaintiff.
Today, it is submitted by D1 that he be given time
for engaging a counsel.
As such, list the matter for further proceedings on
12.11.2025.
(Ravinder Singh II)
DJ-04, North, Rohini Courts,
Delhi/10.09.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS DJ 72/25
Shri Parveen Kumar Vs. Mohd Izrahul Haq
10.09.2025
Present: Dr. V.P. Singh, Sh. Mohit and Sh. Atul Kumar, Ld.
Counsels for the plaintiff.
D1 in person.
Ms. Anshul, Ld. Counsel for the D2 along with D2.
WS has been e-filed by the defendant no.1. Hard
copy placed on record. Copy also supplied to the plaintiff.
Today, it is submitted by D1 that he be given time
for engaging a counsel.
As such, list the matter for further proceedings on
12.11.2025.
(Ravinder Singh II)
DJ-04, North, Rohini Courts,
Delhi/10.09.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS DJ 72/25
Shri Parveen Kumar Vs. Mohd Izrahul Haq
28.05.2025
Present: Sh. V.P. Singh, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Devender Hooda, Ld. Counsel for defendant
no.2 has filed his vakalatnama.
None is present this time for defendant no.1.
It is submitted by ld. Counsel for plaintiff that he
shall supply the copy of plaint along with entire documents to ld.
Counsel for defendant no.2 today itself.
On the last date of hearing, defendant no.1 had
appeared. In the interest of justice, let WS on behalf of both the
defendants be filed within 30 days from today with advance copy
to ld. Counsel for plaintiff on 10.09.2025
(Kishor Kumar)
DJ-04, North, Rohini Courts,
Delhi/28.05.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS DJ 72/25
Shri Parveen Kumar Vs. Mohd Izrahul Haq
28.05.2025
Present: Sh. V.P. Singh, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Devender Hooda, Ld. Counsel for defendant
no.2 has filed his vakalatnama.
None is present this time for defendant no.1.
It is submitted by ld. Counsel for plaintiff that he
shall supply the copy of plaint along with entire documents to ld.
Counsel for defendant no.2 today itself.
On the last date of hearing, defendant no.1 had
appeared. In the interest of justice, let WS on behalf of both the
defendants be filed within 30 days from today with advance copy
to ld. Counsel for plaintiff on 10.09.2025
(Kishor Kumar)
DJ-04, North, Rohini Courts,
Delhi/28.05.2025
-- 1 of 1 --