SGM PAPER PRODUCTS THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE MR SHIBA JYOTI CHAKRAVORTYVsSWISS ELMECH PVT. LTD. +1 more

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 7CS (COMM.)72/26
SGM PAPER PRODUCTS THROUGH ITS
AUTHORIZEDREPRESENTATIVE MR SHIBA JYOTI
CHAKRAVORTY Vs. SWISSELMECH PVT. LTD.
14.05.2026
Present: Proxy counsel for plaintiff.
None for defendant.
No one has appeared on behalf of defendant.
WS has also not been filed.
Proxy counsel for plaintiff submits that no talks of
compromise are going on. In the interest of justice, put up this
matter on 15.07.2026 awaiting appearance of defendant as well
as further proceedings.
(Shailender Malik )
District Judge (Commercial)-02
North District, Rohini Courts,
Delhi/14.05.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 14
CS (COMM.)72/26
SGM PAPER PRODUCTS THROUGH ITS
AUTHORIZEDREPRESENTATIVE MR SHIBA JYOTI
CHAKRAVORTY Vs. SWISSELMECH PVT. LTD.
17.04.2026
Present: Sh. Aayush Kuchhal, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. B. L. Sharma, Ld. Counsel for defendant through
VC
Ld. Counsel for the defendant has put appearance
and submitted that the copy of the summons alongwith
documents have been received on 07.04.2026 and 08.04.2026.
However it is brought to his knowledge that summons to
defendant have already been served through electronic mode on
25.03.2026.
Ld. Counsel for defendant further submits that talks
of compromise are also going on. He however been duly
informed to file written statement within the statutory period
since the date of service.
Moreover, counsel for the defendant has undertaken
to file his memo of appearance/ vakalatnama during the course of
the day.
Counsel for the plaintiff has denied about any talks
of compromise.
Put up on 14.05.2026.
(Shailender Malik)
District Judge (Commercial)-02
North District, Rohini Courts,
Delhi/17.04.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 9CS (COMM.)72/26SGM PAPER PRODUCTS THROUGH ITS
AUTHORIZEDREPRESENTATIVE MR SHIBA JYOTI
CHAKRAVORTY Vs. SWISSELMECH PVT. LTD.
15.07.2026
Present: Sh. Ayush Kochar, ld. Counsel for plaintiff (through
VC).
Sh. Pankaj Tiwari, proxy counsel for Sh. B.L.
Sharma, Ld. Counsel for defendant (through VC).
Proxy counsel for defendants while appearing
through v/c submits that certain payments have already been
made in respect of amount claimed in the present suit i.e.
Rs.50,000/- has been deposited and counsel submits that his
client would deposit the entire claim amount within three
months.
In the absence of any documentary evidence and the
fact that defendant has failed to file the WS, though submissions
of counsel for the defendant has been taken on record, however,
defence of the defendant stands struck off.
Put up now this case on 30.10.2026 for recording of
evidence, if required.
(Shailender Malik )
District Judge (Commercial)-02
North District, Rohini Courts,
Delhi/15.07.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 7CS (COMM.)72/26
SGM PAPER PRODUCTS THROUGH ITS
AUTHORIZEDREPRESENTATIVE MR SHIBA JYOTI
CHAKRAVORTY Vs. SWISSELMECH PVT. LTD.
14.05.2026
Present: Proxy counsel for plaintiff.
None for defendant.
No one has appeared on behalf of defendant.
WS has also not been filed.
Proxy counsel for plaintiff submits that no talks of
compromise are going on. In the interest of justice, put up this
matter on 15.07.2026 awaiting appearance of defendant as well
as further proceedings.
(Shailender Malik )
District Judge (Commercial)-02
North District, Rohini Courts,
Delhi/14.05.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 14
CS (COMM.)72/26
SGM PAPER PRODUCTS THROUGH ITS
AUTHORIZEDREPRESENTATIVE MR SHIBA JYOTI
CHAKRAVORTY Vs. SWISSELMECH PVT. LTD.
17.04.2026
Present: Sh. Aayush Kuchhal, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. B. L. Sharma, Ld. Counsel for defendant through
VC
Ld. Counsel for the defendant has put appearance
and submitted that the copy of the summons alongwith
documents have been received on 07.04.2026 and 08.04.2026.
However it is brought to his knowledge that summons to
defendant have already been served through electronic mode on
25.03.2026.
Ld. Counsel for defendant further submits that talks
of compromise are also going on. He however been duly
informed to file written statement within the statutory period
since the date of service.
Moreover, counsel for the defendant has undertaken
to file his memo of appearance/ vakalatnama during the course of
the day.
Counsel for the plaintiff has denied about any talks
of compromise.
Put up on 14.05.2026.
(Shailender Malik)
District Judge (Commercial)-02
North District, Rohini Courts,
Delhi/17.04.2026
-- 1 of 1 --