Order 10

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 4
CR Rev-23-2023
CNR No.DLNT01-0005532023
SAMAY GARG Vs. RAM RATTAN AND ORS
03.09.2026
Ld. Regular Addl. PP for the State is on leave today and
Substitute Addl. PP is looking after the work of two courts today.
Present : Sh. Sachin Aggarwal, Ld. Counsel for revisionist
(through VC).
Sh. Nikhil Kumar Sharma, Ld. Counsel for revisionist
in person.
Respondent No. 1 is State represented through Ld. APP.
Proceedings against Respondent No.2 have already
been abated.
Respondent no.4 is appearing through VC.
None for the remaining respondents.
Sh. Jatin Madani, Enrollment No.D-10193/2025 Ld.
Proxy Counsel for respondent no.4 on behalf of main
Counsel Sh. Gaurav Gulati.
1. Ld. Proxy Counsel for respondent no.4 has again contended
that complete copies have not been supplied to him.The abovesaid
submissions are strongly opposed by Ld. Counsel for revisionist and
he submits that in fact on the directions of this Court, on 05.03.2025
a complete set of the revision petition was kept on record and
respondent no.4/Vivek Garg was given liberty to receive the same.
2. To end this controversy, let complete deficient copies be
supplied to Ld. Proxy Counsel for respondent no.4 at 02:00 PM.
3. It is made clear to Ld. Proxy Counsel for respondent No.4 that
if no one appears on behalf of respondent no.4 at 02:00 PM then
adverse inference shall be drawn against respondent no.4.
contd……
-- 1 of 3 --
-2-
CR Rev-23-2023
CNR No.DLNT01-0005532023
SAMAY GARG Vs. RAM RATTAN AND ORS
4. The matter be taken up again at 02:00 PM.
(JAGMOHAN SINGH)
ASJ-03, North District
Rohini Courts, Delhi/03.09.2026
At 02:29 PM
Present : Sh. Sachin Aggarwal, Ld. Counsel for revisionist
(through VC).
Sh. Nikhil Kumar Sharma, Ld. Counsel for revisionist
in person.
Respondent No. 1 is State represented through Ld. APP.
Proceedings against Respondent No.2 have already
been abated.
None for the remaining respondents.
Sh. Jatin Madani, Enrollment No.D-10193/2025 Ld.
Proxy Counsel for respondent no.4 on behalf of main
Counsel Sh. Gaurav Gulati.
1. Earlier in the post-lunch session for some time Respondent
No.4 himself appeared through VC. However, he is not appearing at
this stage.
2. On the directions of the Court, a complete set of the
revision petition has been supplied to Ld. Proxy Counsel for
respondent no.4.
3. Ld. Proxy Counsel for respondent no.4 has raised two
objections i.e. (i) certain pages are not legible; (ii) copy of Section
156(3) Cr.P.C petition is also not supplied to respondent no.4
alongwith the documents.
contd……
-- 2 of 3 --
-3-
CR Rev-23-2023
CNR No.DLNT01-0005532023
SAMAY GARG Vs. RAM RATTAN AND ORS
4. Heard. It is fairly submitted by Ld. Proxy Counsel for
respondent no.4 that the copies of abovesaid pages are not legible
even in the revision petition. In the above facts and circumstances,
the first objection is disposed of. As regards the second objection, it
is a matter of record that the petition under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C
filed by the revisionist as well as the accompanying documents are
not part of the revision petition. That being the position, there is no
locus of respondent no.4 to receive a copy thereof at this stage. In the
above facts and circumstances, complete set of revision petition
stands supplied to respondent no.4 in the Court today. The above
controversy is put at rest. It is made clear that no further adjudication
would be made by this Court on this point in future.
5. Respondent no.4 is at liberty to file reply on or before the
next date of hearing with a copy to the revisionist.
6. Respondent No.6 is yet to be served. Accordingly, Ld.
Counsel for revisionist is directed to file fresh address of respondent
no.6 or to bring on record e-mail/mobile number etc. so that service
can be effected upon respondent no.6 through electronic mode.
7. To come up for above purpose/appearance of the
remaining respondents/further proceedings on 15.10.2026.
(JAGMOHAN SINGH)
ASJ-03, North District
Rohini Courts, Delhi/03.09.2026
-- 3 of 3 --