Full Order Text
Order 9 · 31 Jul 2024 · CNR DLNE030009622023
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: Ex. No.272/2023 Shabnam vs. Mohd. Shakeel & anr. 31.07.2024 Present: Sh. Onkar Singh, Ld. counsel for DH. None for JD no.2. None for JD no.1 & 3. Ld. Counsel for DH has submitted that the counsel for the JD no.2 has not supplied the copy of medical documents filed in support of his application u/s 151 CPC to the Ld. Counsel for the DH. Vide this order, I shall dispose of the application filed by the JD no.2 seeking time of two months to handover the possession of the suit property to the DH. 1. It is stated in the present application that the JD no.2 is a widow having three unmarried daughters and she is also suffering from ailments. It is stated that she is ready to vacate the suit property and hand over the possession to the DH but at present, she has no other shelter and she is searching for a suitable accommodation and therefore, time of two months be granted to her to arrange residence for herself and for her children. It is further stated that no prejudice would be caused to the DH if the present application is allowed. 2. On the other hand, the DH has strongly the application stating that the JD only intends to unduly harass the DH. It is further stated that in the present case, eviction decree was passed against the JD on 21.08.2023. Subsequently, the JD no.2 filed an appeal against the said decree but it was disposed of vide order dated 02.11.2023 on the undertaking of the JD no.2 that she will -- 1 of 3 -- -2- hand over the possession of the suit property to the DH by 01.05.2024 subject to payment of Rs.10,000/- per month from November 2023 onwards with a sum of Rs.10,000/- being paid by the JD no.2 to the DH on or before 20.11.2023. However, the JD no.2 did not comply even with the said order. It is further stated that the averments made in the application are vague and therefore, the present application be dismissed with heavy cost. 3. I have carefully perused the present application as well as the reply thereto along with the court record. The record reflects that in the present case, eviction decree was against JD no.2 passed way back on 21.08.2023 and till date, said decree has not be set aside. It is averred in the present application that time of two months be granted to the JD as she is suffering from ailments and she is in search of a suitable accommodation. Since the eviction decree was passed against the JD on 21.08.2023 and thereafter, even the appeal filed by the JD was disposed off on 02.11.2023, it is evidence that the JD had sufficient time to arrange for a suitable alternate accommodation. The JD also failed to comply with the undertaking given in the Ld. Appellate Court at the time of disposal of her appeal which shows the malafide of the JD. In so far as the plea of ailments suffered by the JD is concerned, it is not specified in the present application as to the nature of the illness which is afflicting the JD. However, during arguments, Ld. Counsel for JD had submitted that the JD is suffering from brain hemorrhage and on the last date of hearing, some medical documents had also been filed by Ld. Counsel for the JD. I have perused the said records as well. These records only indicate that the JD suffered from a mild injury and in so far as the pathology report is concerned, the same is also not indicative of -- 2 of 3 -- -3- any serious illness which would compel the court to show some leniency to the JD. The record also reflects that the JD also fails to appear in the Court on hearing dated 17.05.2024 and 29.05.2024 and after issuance of warrants of possession vide order dated 29.05.2024, the present application was filed. It appears that the present application has been filed simply to delay the execution of the eviction decree dated 21.08.2023. 4. In view of the above said discussion, the above application of JD no.2 stands dismissed. Accordingly, the application of the DH seeking police aid for execution of warrants of possession qua the suit property stands allowed. 5. Issue warrants of possession qua the suit property returnable for 13.09.2024. The DH is directed to appear before the Ld. ACJ for the appointment of Bailiff on 21.08.2024. (AAKANKSHA VYAS) SCJ-cum-RC/ North East District, KKD/Delhi/31.07.2024 -- 3 of 3 --
