Full Order Text
Order 7 · 28 Apr 2025 · CNR DLNE030008672024
Order Details: COPY OF JUDGMENT Pdf Text: CS No. 568/2024 Indu Sharma v. Mushran Page No. 1/ 5 IN THE COURT OF SH. ANIMESH BHASKAR MANI TRIPATHI ACJ-CUM-ARC-CUM-CCJ, NORTH EAST DISTRICT: KARKARDOOMA COURTS, DELHI DLNE030008672024 CS No. 568/2024 Indu Sharma W/o late Yatender Sharma, R/o C-9/2, Yamuna Vihar, Delhi-110053 …........PLAINTIFF Versus Mushran Prop. Of M/s Bharat Enterprises One big shop out of property bearing No.C-30 and 32, Khasra No.116/1 and 117/1, Village Ghonda Gujran Bangar, (Pandit Roop Chand Market Adarsh Market), North Ghonda, Opp. BSES Office, Delhi-110053. ........DEFENDANT Date of Institution : 23.11.2024 Date of reserving the judgment : 28.04.2025 Date of Judgment : 28.04.2025 Decision : Decreed -- 1 of 5 -- CS No. 568/2024 Indu Sharma v. Mushran Page No. 2/ 5 SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF POSSESSION, PERMANENT INJUNCTION, RECOVERY OF RENT AND DAMAGES EX-PARTE JUDGMENT 1. The suit in hand has been filed by the plaintiff against defendant for recovery of possession, permanent injunction, recovery of rent and damages. Pleadings of the plaintiff:- 2. The plaintiff is the owner and landlord of a built-up shop forming part of properties bearing Nos. C-30 and C-32, Khasra Nos. 116/1 and 117/1, Village Ghonda, Gujran Bangar, North Ghonda, Delhi-110053 (as per site plan). The plaintiff’s husband had initially let out the suit property to the defendant on an oral tenancy at a monthly rent of 9,000/-, supported by rent receipts ₹ signed by the defendant. Following the death of the plaintiff’s husband on 30.08.2021, the plaintiff alleged to have became the owner/landlord by operation of law. 3. The defendant last paid rent for September 2024 but refused to pay rent for October 2024, demanding a unilateral reduction in rent. Consequently, the plaintiff served a legal notice dated 21.10.2024 under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act, but the defendant neither responded nor complied. The defendant also allegedly threatened to create third-party interests and refused to vacate. Hence, the present suit has been filed, -- 2 of 5 -- CS No. 568/2024 Indu Sharma v. Mushran Page No. 3/ 5 seeking possession, arrears of rent, and damages for use and occupation. Ex parte evidence: - 4. During proceedings, memo of appearance was filed on behalf of defendant on 29.01.2025 and upon non appearance, defendant was proceeded ex parte on 26.03.2025. In ex-parte PE, to prove his case, plaintiff got examined himself as PW1 and he relied upon the documents as under:- 1. Copy of rent receipt dated 10.09.2024 Ex. PW1/1 (OSR) 2. Legal notice dated 21.10.2024 Ex. PW1/2 3. Postal receipt dated 22.10.2024 Ex. PW1/3 4. Tracking report showing deliver of legal notice on 23.10.2024 Ex. PW1/4 is de- exhibited and now marked as Mark-A 5. Site plan of the suit property Ex. PW1/5 5. Thereafter, ex-parte PE was closed and matter was listed for ex-parte final arguments. Decision with reasons:- 6. I have heard the ex-parte final arguments on behalf of the plaintiffs and perused the record. -- 3 of 5 -- CS No. 568/2024 Indu Sharma v. Mushran Page No. 4/ 5 7. The only issue which needs adjudication in this matter is whether plaintiff has proved its case or not. The testimony of plaintiff\ has remained controverted and unrebutted. Plaintiff has brought the rent receipt of September 2024 as Ex PW1/1, Legal notice terminating the tenancy Ex. PW-1/2 and site plan Ex. PW-1/5, to prove the subsistence of tenancy and acceptance of the same by the tenant as the receipt bears the signature of the tenant. The notice u/s 106 TPA was also served Ex PW1/3 & Ex.PW1/4. 8. That the suit was filed within limitation period and within proper jurisdiction. Thus, in view of unrebutted testimony of plaintiff, there appears no bar in decreeing the suit in favour of plaintiff. Therefore, in my opinion plaintiff has been successfully able to establish his case. Relief: 9. Therefore, in view of the above discussion, the suit of the plaintiff is decreed. Plaintiff is entitled to recovery of possession of one shop (marked red in site plan) at C-30 and C-32, Khasra Nos. 116/1 and 117/1, Village Ghonda, Gujran Bangar, North Ghonda, Delhi-110053 and defendant is directed to vacate and hand over possession of the suit property within 30 days. Further, the defendant is restricted from creating any third party interest in the suit property as per site plan marked red. The plaintiff is also entitled to recovery of rent @ Rs. 9,000/- per month from October 2024, till the time of handing over of possession by the defendant along with pendente-lite and future -- 4 of 5 -- CS No. 568/2024 Indu Sharma v. Mushran Page No. 5/ 5 interest @ 6% p.a. from the date of filing of suit till the realization of amount. No order as to cost. 10. Decree sheet be prepared accordingly and file be consigned to the Record Room after due compliance. Announced in the open court (Animesh Bhaskar Mani Tripathi) on 28th April, 2025 ACJ-cum-ARC-cum-CCJ North-East District, KKD, Delhi -- 5 of 5 --
