Interim Order 5

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 21 MISC SCJ 77/25
SANTOSH SHARMA
Vs.
BSES YPL
21.11.2025
Present: Sh.B.N. Singh, Ld. counsel for petitioner.
Sh. Prashant Kumar Sharma, Ld. counsel for
respondent/BSES alongwith Deputy General
Manager/Sh. Devender Panwar.
Respondent placed on record copy of bill dated
13.05.2025 in the name of petitioner Ms. Santosh, whereupon the
endorsement regarding part payment has been made by the
official of respondent. Same is retained on record. Written
synopsis also filed by respondent, taken on record.
Arguments advanced on behalf of both sides.
It is fairly conceded on behalf of contemnor that it is
Sh. Dinesh Chand, who deposited the amount of Rs. 25,200/-
against the current demand of Rs. 3,645/- for the bill reflecting
the arrears which sum totals amount of Rs. 75,250/-. It is further
submitted that after the bill dated 13.05.2025, the respondent is
fairly receiving only current demand and not the arrears. It is
further submitted that after getting the notice of this fact of
contention raised by consumer/Ms. Santosh that she don’t want
to deposit the arrears, so respondent/BSES will credit the excess
amount in the CA number of petitioner. It is specified that the
current demand amount will be deducted from Rs. 25,200/-
which was deposited against the bill dated 13.05.2025 and
-- 1 of 2 --
remaining will be credited in the account of CA number
pertaining to petitioner Ms. Santosh.
In view of the submissions on behalf of respondent,
it is reflected that the respondent has fairly conceded to credit the
excess amount in the account pertaining to CA number of
petitioner Ms. Santosh, so for the allegation against the
respondent that the petitioner was forced to pay excess bill needs
the evidence.
Matter is adjourned for framing of issues.
It be relisted alongwith connected case on
16.02.2026.
AJAY KUMAR MALIK
JSCC/ASCJ/G.JUDGE (N/E)
21.11.2025
-- 2 of 2 --