Skip to main content
Civ Suit - CIVIL SUIT FOR CIVIL JUDGE

CHARAN SINGHVsNeelam +1 more

CNR DLNE03000637202472-ACJ/CCJ/ARC
Karkardooma North-East, Senior Civil Judge cum RC Court
delhi · Delhi (DL)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN
Decision Date: 03rd December 2024

TrustJury record updated 19 Oct 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
417/2024
Registration Date
09 Sept 2024

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    3

    Petitioner

    1. 1CHARAN SINGH

    Respondent

    1. 1Neelam
    2. 2Rajesh Kumar

    Acts & Sections

    3
    Permanent Injuction · Sec 73
    possession · Sec 76
    Suit For Declaration · Sec 97

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 09-09-2024
Business: f.p.
Next Purpose: Misc. cases
Next Hearing Date: 09-10-2024

Date: 09-10-2024
Business: reply and arguments
Next Purpose: Misc. Arguments
Next Hearing Date: 13-11-2024

Date: 13-11-2024
Business: arguments
Next Purpose: Misc. Arguments
Next Hearing Date: 03-12-2024

Date: 03-12-2024
Business: Present suit is disposed off as withdrawn.
Nature Of Disposal: DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN
Disposal Date: 03-12-2024

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 620/2024
Filing Date: 21-10-2023
eFiling Number: DLNE040026432023
First Hearing Date: 09th September 2024
Decision Date: 03rd December 2024
Court Number And Judge: 72-ACJ/CCJ/ARC

    Orders

    5
    Final Order 3
    03 Dec 2024
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 15
Civ Suit 417/24
CHARAN SINGH Vs. NEELAM
03.12.2024
Present: Plaintiff in person.
Sh. Manish Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff
(through VC).
Defendant no. 1 in person with Ld. Counsel Sh.
Satish Verma.
None for defendant no. 2.
Perusal of the record reveals that no one has
appeared on behalf of defendant no. 2 from past four dates of
hearing. It appears that defendant no. 2 is not interested in
pursuing the present case. In view of the same, defendant no. 2
is proceeded against ex-parte.
Reply to the application of the plaintiff u/O 6 Rule
17 CPC, filed on behalf of defendant no. 1 today. Advance copy
already supplied.
Arguments heard.
At this stage, plaintiff has sought an opportunity to
withdraw the present suit with liberty to file afresh on some
technical ground. Separate statement of plaintiff is recorded to
this effect.
In view of separate statement of plaintiff, present
suit is disposed off as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh.
File be consigned to record room after due
compliance.
ANIMESH BHASKAR MANI TRIPATHI
ACJ-cum-ARC-cum-CCJ
North-East/Karkardooma Courts,
Delhi/03.12.2024
-- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 2
    13 Nov 2024
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 22
Civ Suit 417/24
CHARAN SINGH Vs. NEELAM
13.11.2024
Present: Plaintiff in person with Ld. Counsel Sh. Manish
Kumar.
Defendant no. 1 in person with Ld. Counsel Sh.
Satish Verma.
None for the defendant no. 2.
Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff has submitted that he
has supplied the legible copy of documents to the defendant no. 1
on 13.10.2024, however, the reply has not been filed till date.
At this stage, Ld. Counsel for the D-1 has submitted
that the documents were duly supplied, however, the same could
not be opened and due to mistake on his part the same could not
be communicated to counsel for the plaintiff.
Heard.
Be that as it may.
Today in court, copy of legible copy has been
supplied to the D-1 by the plaintiff.
Final opportunity is granted to the D-1 to file any
reply, if any, with advance copy to opposite counsel.
Put up for arguments on 03.12.2024.
ANIMESH BHASKAR MANI TRIPATHI
ACJ-cum-ARC-cum-CCJ
North-East/Karkardooma Courts,
Delhi/13.11.2024
-- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 1
    09 Oct 2024
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 12
Civ Suit 417/24
CHARAN SINGH Vs. NEELAM
09.10.2024
Present: Plaintiff in person.
Sh. Manish Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff
(through VC).
Defendant no. 1 with Ld. Counsel Sh. Satish Verma.
Reply to application u/O 6 Rule 17 CPC not yet
filed. Same be filed within 02 weeks from today with advance
copy of the same to opposite counsel one week prior to next date
of hearing.
Ld. Counsel for the defendant no. 1 submits that the
documents received by him are illegible.
Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff submits that he has
supplied the copies of documents as they are available with him.
At this stage, the documents annexed with plaint
supplied to the defendant no. 1 are perused. Same appears to be
illegible.
Plaintiff shall supply the legible copy of documents
to the opposite side within one week from today.
Put up for filing reply and arguments on application
u/O 6 Rule 17 CPC on 13.11.2024.
RINKU JAIN
ACJ-cum-ARC-cum-CCJ
North-East/Karkardooma Courts,
Delhi/09.10.2024
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 2
    13 Nov 2024
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 22
Civ Suit 417/24
CHARAN SINGH Vs. NEELAM
13.11.2024
Present: Plaintiff in person with Ld. Counsel Sh. Manish
Kumar.
Defendant no. 1 in person with Ld. Counsel Sh.
Satish Verma.
None for the defendant no. 2.
Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff has submitted that he
has supplied the legible copy of documents to the defendant no. 1
on 13.10.2024, however, the reply has not been filed till date.
At this stage, Ld. Counsel for the D-1 has submitted
that the documents were duly supplied, however, the same could
not be opened and due to mistake on his part the same could not
be communicated to counsel for the plaintiff.
Heard.
Be that as it may.
Today in court, copy of legible copy has been
supplied to the D-1 by the plaintiff.
Final opportunity is granted to the D-1 to file any
reply, if any, with advance copy to opposite counsel.
Put up for arguments on 03.12.2024.
ANIMESH BHASKAR MANI TRIPATHI
ACJ-cum-ARC-cum-CCJ
North-East/Karkardooma Courts,
Delhi/13.11.2024
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 1
    09 Oct 2024
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 12
Civ Suit 417/24
CHARAN SINGH Vs. NEELAM
09.10.2024
Present: Plaintiff in person.
Sh. Manish Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff
(through VC).
Defendant no. 1 with Ld. Counsel Sh. Satish Verma.
Reply to application u/O 6 Rule 17 CPC not yet
filed. Same be filed within 02 weeks from today with advance
copy of the same to opposite counsel one week prior to next date
of hearing.
Ld. Counsel for the defendant no. 1 submits that the
documents received by him are illegible.
Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff submits that he has
supplied the copies of documents as they are available with him.
At this stage, the documents annexed with plaint
supplied to the defendant no. 1 are perused. Same appears to be
illegible.
Plaintiff shall supply the legible copy of documents
to the opposite side within one week from today.
Put up for filing reply and arguments on application
u/O 6 Rule 17 CPC on 13.11.2024.
RINKU JAIN
ACJ-cum-ARC-cum-CCJ
North-East/Karkardooma Courts,
Delhi/09.10.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.