Order 7

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 2 Civ Suit 363/25
UNION BANK OF INDIA Vs. Shimla Devi
23/04/2026
Present: Mr. Ravi Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Application under Section 151 CPC for substitution
of AR filed on behalf of plaintiff on 04.04.2026. It is stated that
the previous AR has been transferred and now Mr. Yogender
Kumar has been authorized to depose on behalf of plaintiff bank.
Authority letter is annexed with the application.
In view of the averment made, present application
stands allowed and Mr. Yogender Kumar is substituted as AR.
Ld.Counsel for plaintiff has also filed tracking report
of summons sent through Speed Post. In the present case
summons have been returned to the Ahlmad.
Receipt of previous cost Rs.700/- deposited in DLSA
filed today.
Application U/o 5 Rule 20 has also been filed on
behalf of plaintiff on 04.04.2026.
It is stated in the application that despite efforts
summons could not be served to the defendant on his last given
address, it is further submitted that the fresh address of the
defendant is not traceable despite diligent efforts by the plaintiff.
It is therefore prayed that defendant be allowed to be served
through publication.
Heard. Record perused.
-- 1 of 2 --
In view of the above, I am satisfied that service of
the defendant can not be effected through ordinary process.
Defendant be served by way of publication in newspaper
namely ‘Veer Arjun’ and ‘Viraat Vaibhav’ on taking requisite
steps for the NDOH.
Put up for service report on 04.06.2026.
(TANIA SINGH)
SCJ-cum-RC (North-East)
KKD Courts/23/04/2026
-- 2 of 2 --