INTEZARVsSH. VAKEEL +6 more

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 13 Civ Suit 258/24
INTEZAR Vs. SH. VAKEEL
26/05/2026
Present: Mr. S. A. Khan, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Mr. Rishab Jain, Ld. Proxy Counsel for the
defendant no. 1,3,4 and 6 through VC.
Defendant no. 2,5 and 7 are already ex-parte.
Adjournment is sought by Ld. Proxy Counsel for
defendant that main Ld. Counsel is busy in Hon’ble High Court
of Delhi today.
Heard.
As per record, after filing of application U/o VII rule
11 CPC adjournment was sought by Ld. Counsel for defendant
no. 1,3,4 and 6 on 10.09.2025 and 19.11.2025 and even today.
Part arguments were heard on aforesaid application
on the last date of hearing. It is apparent that the applicants are
themselves not appearing for advancing further arguments in the
present application.
However, in the interest of justice, one last and final
opportunity is granted to advance further arguments failing which
Court shall be constrained to pass adverse orders.
Put up for purpose fixed on 31.07.2026.
(TANIA SINGH)
SCJ-cum-RC (North-East)
KKD Courts/26/05/2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 14 Civ Suit 258/24
INTEZAR Vs. SH. VAKEEL
29/04/2026
Present: Mr. Kashif Ahmad Khan & Mr. Aysha Usmani, Ld.
Counsels for the plaintiff.
Mr. Rishabh Jain, Ld.Proxy Counsel for the
defendant.
Mr. Anand Awasthi, Ld. Counsel for defendant
through VC.
Part arguments heard on application U/o 7 Rule 11
CPC.
Put up for further arguments on 26.05.2026.
(TANIA SINGH)
SCJ-cum-RC (North-East)
KKD Courts/29/04/2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 13 Civ Suit 258/24
INTEZAR Vs. SH. VAKEEL
19/11/2025
Present: Ms. Mishti Sharma, Ld. Proxy Counsel for the
plaintiff.
Mr. Chaitnya Puri, Ld. Counsel for the defendant
no. 1, 3, 4 & 6.
Defendant no. 2, 5 and 7 already Ex-parte.
Adjournment is sought on behalf of defendant no. 1,
3, 4 & 6 to argue on application under Order 7 Rule 11 of CPC.
Heard. Granted.
Re-list the matter for arguments on application under
Order 7 Rule 11 of CPC on 13.01.2026.
(TANIA SINGH)
SCJ-cum-RC (North-East)
KKD Courts/19/11/2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 18 Civ Suit 258/24
INTEZAR Vs. SH. VAKEEL
10/09/2025
Present: Sh. Khalid Miyyan, Ld. Proxy Counsel for the
plaintiff.
Sh. Anand Awasthi, Ld. Counsel for the defendant
no. 1, 3, 4 and 6 through VC.
Defendant no. 2, 5 and 7 are already ex-parte
Matter is at the stage of arguments on the application
U/o 7 Rule 11 CPC, however, adjournment is sought by the Ld.
Counsel for the defendant no. 1, 3, 4 and 6 to advance arguments
on the grounds that he is not available today since he has to
attend an urgent matter before the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi.
Main counsel for the plaintiff is also stated to be
unavailable today.
Considering the submissions made, adjournment is
allowed for today only.
Now to come up for arguments on the application
U/o 7 Rule 11 CPC on 19/11/2025.
(PRIGYA GUPTA)
SCJ-cum-RC (North-East)
KKD Courts/10/09/2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 13 Civ Suit 258/24
INTEZAR Vs. SH. VAKEEL
09/07/2025
Present: Sh. S.A. Khan and Sh. Khalid Miyyan, Ld. Counsels
for the plaintiff.
Sh. Anand Awasthi, Ld. Counsel for the defendant
no. 1, 3, 4 and 6.
Defendant no. 2, 5 and 7 are already ex-parte
Replication filed on behalf of the plaintiff. Copy
supplied to the Ld. Counsel for D-1, 3, 4 and 6,
Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff submits that he does not
intend to file reply to the application U/o 7 Rule 11 CPC and
shall straightaway argue on the application.
Considering the submissions made, now to come up
for arguments on the application U/o 7 Rule 11 CPC on
10/09/2025.
(PRIGYA GUPTA)
SCJ-cum-RC (North-East)
KKD Courts/09/07/2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 11 Civ Suit 258/24
INTEZAR Vs. SH. VAKEEL
26/03/2025
Present: Ms. Mishti Sharma, Ld. Proxy Counsel for the
plaintiff.
Sh. Kasif Ahmad, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff
through VC.
None for D-1, D-3, D-4 and D-6.
D-2, D-5 and D-7 are ex-parte.
Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff submits that he could
not file the replication as he child was hospitalized. Time is
sought to file the replication.
Considering the submissions made, one more
opportunity is given to file the replication.
Today none has appeared for the defendants.
In the interest of justice, no adverse order is being
passed.
Let the previous cost be paid on the next date of
hearing.
Now to come up for completion of
pleadings/framing of issues on 15/05/2025.
(PRIGYA GUPTA)
SCJ-cum-RC (North-East)
KKD Courts/26/03/2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 7 Civ Suit 258/24
INTEZAR Vs. SH. VAKEEL
20/02/2025
Lawyers are abstaining from work today.
Present: Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff through VC.
Ld. Counsel for the defendant no. 1, 3, 4 and 6.
Defendant no. 2, 5 and 7 are ex-parte.
Replication/reply on behalf of the plaintiff has not
been filed.
Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff submits that the copy of
the WS, reply and applications has been supplied by the
defendants today itself in the morning.
It is evident that today’s adjournment has been
necessitated due to lapse on the part of the defendant no. 1, 3, 4
and 6. The defendant no. 1, 3, 4 and 6. are accordingly burdened
with a cost of Rs. 500/- each payable to the plaintiff.
Replication, if any, be filed before NDOH with
advance copy to the opposite party.
Now to come up for completion of
pleadings/framing of issues on 26/03/2025.
(PRIGYA GUPTA)
SCJ-cum-RC (North-East)
KKD Courts/20/02/2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 4
Civ Suit 258/24
INTEZAR Vs. SH. VAKEEL
11/12/2024
Present: Sh. Kasif Ahmad, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff
through VC.
Sh. Anand Awasthi and Sh. Samrat Harihar, Ld.
Counsels for the defendant no. 1, 3, 4 and 6.
Defendant no. 2, 5 and 7 are already ex-parte.
WS, reply to the application U/o 39 Rule 1 & 2
along with an application for condonation of delay and an
application U/o 7 Rule 11 CPC was filed on behalf of defendant
no. 1, 3, 4 and 6 on the last date of hearing.
Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff submits that he has not
received the copy of the WS, reply and the applications.
Let the copy be supplied to the Ld. Counsel for the
plaintiff within five working days.
Replication/reply, if any, be filed before NDOH with
advance copy to the opposite party.
Now to come up on 20/02/2025.
(PRIGYA GUPTA)
SCJ-cum-RC (North-East)
KKD Courts/11/12/2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: Civ Suit No.258/24
Intezar vs Vakeel
12.09.2024
Present: Sh. Ahil Nawaz, Ld. Proxy Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Anand Awasthi, Ld. Counsel for the defendants
no.1, 3, 4 and 6.
None for the remaining defendants no.2, 5 and 7.
Since, no one has appeared on behalf of the
defendants no.2, 5 and 7 despite opportunity and repeated calls,
the defendants no.2, 5 and 7 are proceeded against
ex-parte.
Perusal of record shows that till date, Written
Statement has not been filed on behalf of the defendants no.1, 3,
4 and 6. Ld. Counsel for the defendants no.1, 3, 4 and 6 has
sought one more opportunity to file Written Statement.
In the interest of justice, last opportunity is granted
to the defendants no.1, 3, 4 and 6 to file Written Statement along
with appropriate application on or before the NDOH with
advance copy to the other side. Thereafter, replication (if any) be
filed by the plaintiff on the NDOH with advance copy to the
other side.
Re-list for completion of pleadings and arguments
on the application of the plaintiff under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2
CPC on 16.10.2024.
(AAKANKSHA VYAS)
SCJ-cum-RC (North-East)
KKD Courts/12.09.2024(k)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: Civ Suit No.258/24
Intezar vs Vakeel
27.07.2024
Present: Ms. Aysha Usmani, Ld. Proxy Counsel for the
plaintiff.
Defendants no.1, 3, 4 and 6 in person.
Sh. Samrat Harihar, Ld. Counsel for the defendants
no.1, 3, 4 and 6.
Remaining defendants are absent despite service of
summons. Last opportunity is granted to the remaining
defendants to appear in person on the NDOH.
Vakalatnama filed on behalf of the defendants no.1,
3, 4 and 6. The same is taken on record.
Ld. Counsel for the defendants submitted that the
copy of some documents of paper book received is not legible.
The plaintiff is directed to supply the fresh legible
copy of the aforesaid documents to Ld. Counsel for the
defendants no.1, 3, 4 and 6 within a week from today.
The defendants no.1, 3, 4 and 6 are directed to file
Written Statement within stipulated period along with reply to the
application under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC of the plaintiff with
advance copy to the other side.
Re-list for completion of pleadings on 12.09.2024.
(AAKANKSHA VYAS)
SCJ-cum-RC (North-East)
KKD Courts/27.07.2024(k)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: Civ Suit 258/24
INTEZAR Vs. SH. VAKEEL
03.06.2024
Fresh suit is received by way of assignment. It be checked and
registered.
Present: Sh. S. A. Khan, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Heard and perused the record.
Let summons for settlement of issues and notice of
application under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC be issued to the
defendants on filing of PF/RC/speed post returnable for
27.07.2024.
The ld. Counsel for plaintiff has also pressed upon
the application filed by plaintiff u/s 151 CPC for grant of ad-
interim injunction. However, at this stage, I am not inclined to
grant ex-parte injunction in favour of the plaintiff.
(AAKANKSHA VYAS)
SCJ-cum-RC (North-East)
KKD Courts/03.06.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 17 Civ Suit 258/24
INTEZAR Vs. SH. VAKEEL
31.07.2026
Present: Mr. Kashif Ahmad Khan, Ld. Counsel for the
plaintiff.
Mr. Rishabh Jain, Ld. Proxy Counsel for
defendant no. 1, 3, 4 & 6.
Mr. Robin Singh, Ld. Proxy Counsel for
defendant no. 1, 3, 4 & 6 (through VC).
Defendant no. 2, 5 & 7 are already Ex-parte.
Previous cost not paid.
Adjournment is again sought by Ld. Proxy Counsel
for defendant no. 1, 3, 4 & 6 for further arguments on application
under Order VII Rule 11 of CPC on the ground that main
Counsel is not well. Today, it was the last and final opportunity
granted to Counsel for defendant no. 1, 3, 4 & 6 for advancing
further arguments on the aforesaid application. Medical
documents of Ld. Counsel Mr. Anand Awasthi filed today.
Heard. Adjournment not opposed. Same is granted.
Put up for further arguments on application under
Order VII Rule 11 of CPC on 16.09.2026.
(TANIA SINGH)
SCJ-cum-RC (North-East)
KKD Courts-31.07.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 13 Civ Suit 258/24
INTEZAR Vs. SH. VAKEEL
26/05/2026
Present: Mr. S. A. Khan, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Mr. Rishab Jain, Ld. Proxy Counsel for the
defendant no. 1,3,4 and 6 through VC.
Defendant no. 2,5 and 7 are already ex-parte.
Adjournment is sought by Ld. Proxy Counsel for
defendant that main Ld. Counsel is busy in Hon’ble High Court
of Delhi today.
Heard.
As per record, after filing of application U/o VII rule
11 CPC adjournment was sought by Ld. Counsel for defendant
no. 1,3,4 and 6 on 10.09.2025 and 19.11.2025 and even today.
Part arguments were heard on aforesaid application
on the last date of hearing. It is apparent that the applicants are
themselves not appearing for advancing further arguments in the
present application.
However, in the interest of justice, one last and final
opportunity is granted to advance further arguments failing which
Court shall be constrained to pass adverse orders.
Put up for purpose fixed on 31.07.2026.
(TANIA SINGH)
SCJ-cum-RC (North-East)
KKD Courts/26/05/2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 14 Civ Suit 258/24
INTEZAR Vs. SH. VAKEEL
29/04/2026
Present: Mr. Kashif Ahmad Khan & Mr. Aysha Usmani, Ld.
Counsels for the plaintiff.
Mr. Rishabh Jain, Ld.Proxy Counsel for the
defendant.
Mr. Anand Awasthi, Ld. Counsel for defendant
through VC.
Part arguments heard on application U/o 7 Rule 11
CPC.
Put up for further arguments on 26.05.2026.
(TANIA SINGH)
SCJ-cum-RC (North-East)
KKD Courts/29/04/2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 13 Civ Suit 258/24
INTEZAR Vs. SH. VAKEEL
19/11/2025
Present: Ms. Mishti Sharma, Ld. Proxy Counsel for the
plaintiff.
Mr. Chaitnya Puri, Ld. Counsel for the defendant
no. 1, 3, 4 & 6.
Defendant no. 2, 5 and 7 already Ex-parte.
Adjournment is sought on behalf of defendant no. 1,
3, 4 & 6 to argue on application under Order 7 Rule 11 of CPC.
Heard. Granted.
Re-list the matter for arguments on application under
Order 7 Rule 11 of CPC on 13.01.2026.
(TANIA SINGH)
SCJ-cum-RC (North-East)
KKD Courts/19/11/2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 18 Civ Suit 258/24
INTEZAR Vs. SH. VAKEEL
10/09/2025
Present: Sh. Khalid Miyyan, Ld. Proxy Counsel for the
plaintiff.
Sh. Anand Awasthi, Ld. Counsel for the defendant
no. 1, 3, 4 and 6 through VC.
Defendant no. 2, 5 and 7 are already ex-parte
Matter is at the stage of arguments on the application
U/o 7 Rule 11 CPC, however, adjournment is sought by the Ld.
Counsel for the defendant no. 1, 3, 4 and 6 to advance arguments
on the grounds that he is not available today since he has to
attend an urgent matter before the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi.
Main counsel for the plaintiff is also stated to be
unavailable today.
Considering the submissions made, adjournment is
allowed for today only.
Now to come up for arguments on the application
U/o 7 Rule 11 CPC on 19/11/2025.
(PRIGYA GUPTA)
SCJ-cum-RC (North-East)
KKD Courts/10/09/2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 13 Civ Suit 258/24
INTEZAR Vs. SH. VAKEEL
09/07/2025
Present: Sh. S.A. Khan and Sh. Khalid Miyyan, Ld. Counsels
for the plaintiff.
Sh. Anand Awasthi, Ld. Counsel for the defendant
no. 1, 3, 4 and 6.
Defendant no. 2, 5 and 7 are already ex-parte
Replication filed on behalf of the plaintiff. Copy
supplied to the Ld. Counsel for D-1, 3, 4 and 6,
Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff submits that he does not
intend to file reply to the application U/o 7 Rule 11 CPC and
shall straightaway argue on the application.
Considering the submissions made, now to come up
for arguments on the application U/o 7 Rule 11 CPC on
10/09/2025.
(PRIGYA GUPTA)
SCJ-cum-RC (North-East)
KKD Courts/09/07/2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 11 Civ Suit 258/24
INTEZAR Vs. SH. VAKEEL
26/03/2025
Present: Ms. Mishti Sharma, Ld. Proxy Counsel for the
plaintiff.
Sh. Kasif Ahmad, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff
through VC.
None for D-1, D-3, D-4 and D-6.
D-2, D-5 and D-7 are ex-parte.
Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff submits that he could
not file the replication as he child was hospitalized. Time is
sought to file the replication.
Considering the submissions made, one more
opportunity is given to file the replication.
Today none has appeared for the defendants.
In the interest of justice, no adverse order is being
passed.
Let the previous cost be paid on the next date of
hearing.
Now to come up for completion of
pleadings/framing of issues on 15/05/2025.
(PRIGYA GUPTA)
SCJ-cum-RC (North-East)
KKD Courts/26/03/2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 7 Civ Suit 258/24
INTEZAR Vs. SH. VAKEEL
20/02/2025
Lawyers are abstaining from work today.
Present: Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff through VC.
Ld. Counsel for the defendant no. 1, 3, 4 and 6.
Defendant no. 2, 5 and 7 are ex-parte.
Replication/reply on behalf of the plaintiff has not
been filed.
Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff submits that the copy of
the WS, reply and applications has been supplied by the
defendants today itself in the morning.
It is evident that today’s adjournment has been
necessitated due to lapse on the part of the defendant no. 1, 3, 4
and 6. The defendant no. 1, 3, 4 and 6. are accordingly burdened
with a cost of Rs. 500/- each payable to the plaintiff.
Replication, if any, be filed before NDOH with
advance copy to the opposite party.
Now to come up for completion of
pleadings/framing of issues on 26/03/2025.
(PRIGYA GUPTA)
SCJ-cum-RC (North-East)
KKD Courts/20/02/2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 4
Civ Suit 258/24
INTEZAR Vs. SH. VAKEEL
11/12/2024
Present: Sh. Kasif Ahmad, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff
through VC.
Sh. Anand Awasthi and Sh. Samrat Harihar, Ld.
Counsels for the defendant no. 1, 3, 4 and 6.
Defendant no. 2, 5 and 7 are already ex-parte.
WS, reply to the application U/o 39 Rule 1 & 2
along with an application for condonation of delay and an
application U/o 7 Rule 11 CPC was filed on behalf of defendant
no. 1, 3, 4 and 6 on the last date of hearing.
Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff submits that he has not
received the copy of the WS, reply and the applications.
Let the copy be supplied to the Ld. Counsel for the
plaintiff within five working days.
Replication/reply, if any, be filed before NDOH with
advance copy to the opposite party.
Now to come up on 20/02/2025.
(PRIGYA GUPTA)
SCJ-cum-RC (North-East)
KKD Courts/11/12/2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: Civ Suit No.258/24
Intezar vs Vakeel
12.09.2024
Present: Sh. Ahil Nawaz, Ld. Proxy Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Anand Awasthi, Ld. Counsel for the defendants
no.1, 3, 4 and 6.
None for the remaining defendants no.2, 5 and 7.
Since, no one has appeared on behalf of the
defendants no.2, 5 and 7 despite opportunity and repeated calls,
the defendants no.2, 5 and 7 are proceeded against
ex-parte.
Perusal of record shows that till date, Written
Statement has not been filed on behalf of the defendants no.1, 3,
4 and 6. Ld. Counsel for the defendants no.1, 3, 4 and 6 has
sought one more opportunity to file Written Statement.
In the interest of justice, last opportunity is granted
to the defendants no.1, 3, 4 and 6 to file Written Statement along
with appropriate application on or before the NDOH with
advance copy to the other side. Thereafter, replication (if any) be
filed by the plaintiff on the NDOH with advance copy to the
other side.
Re-list for completion of pleadings and arguments
on the application of the plaintiff under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2
CPC on 16.10.2024.
(AAKANKSHA VYAS)
SCJ-cum-RC (North-East)
KKD Courts/12.09.2024(k)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: Civ Suit No.258/24
Intezar vs Vakeel
27.07.2024
Present: Ms. Aysha Usmani, Ld. Proxy Counsel for the
plaintiff.
Defendants no.1, 3, 4 and 6 in person.
Sh. Samrat Harihar, Ld. Counsel for the defendants
no.1, 3, 4 and 6.
Remaining defendants are absent despite service of
summons. Last opportunity is granted to the remaining
defendants to appear in person on the NDOH.
Vakalatnama filed on behalf of the defendants no.1,
3, 4 and 6. The same is taken on record.
Ld. Counsel for the defendants submitted that the
copy of some documents of paper book received is not legible.
The plaintiff is directed to supply the fresh legible
copy of the aforesaid documents to Ld. Counsel for the
defendants no.1, 3, 4 and 6 within a week from today.
The defendants no.1, 3, 4 and 6 are directed to file
Written Statement within stipulated period along with reply to the
application under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC of the plaintiff with
advance copy to the other side.
Re-list for completion of pleadings on 12.09.2024.
(AAKANKSHA VYAS)
SCJ-cum-RC (North-East)
KKD Courts/27.07.2024(k)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: Civ Suit 258/24
INTEZAR Vs. SH. VAKEEL
03.06.2024
Fresh suit is received by way of assignment. It be checked and
registered.
Present: Sh. S. A. Khan, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Heard and perused the record.
Let summons for settlement of issues and notice of
application under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC be issued to the
defendants on filing of PF/RC/speed post returnable for
27.07.2024.
The ld. Counsel for plaintiff has also pressed upon
the application filed by plaintiff u/s 151 CPC for grant of ad-
interim injunction. However, at this stage, I am not inclined to
grant ex-parte injunction in favour of the plaintiff.
(AAKANKSHA VYAS)
SCJ-cum-RC (North-East)
KKD Courts/03.06.2024
-- 1 of 1 --