Full Order Text
Final Order 5 · 22 Sept 2025 · CNR DLNE030002342025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDGMENT Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF SH. ANIMESH BHASKAR MANI TRIPATHI ACJ-CUM-ARC-CUM-CCJ, NORTH EAST DISTRICT: KARKARDOOMA COURTS, DELHI DLNE030002342025 SC No. 11/2025 Sh. Mohit Panwar S/o Sh. Mahender Pal Panwar, R/o C-11/186, Yamuna Vihar, Delhi – 110053. .............Petitioner Versus 1. Govt. of NCT of Delhi Service to be effected through The Chief Secretary, 5, Shamnath Marg, Delhi-110054. 2. Sh. Mahender Pal Panwar S/o Late Sh. Kansi Ram 3. Smt. Renu Panwar, D/o Sh. Mahender Pal Panwar 4. Smt. Kamini Panwar D/o Sh. Mahender Pal Panwar (Respondent no. 2 to 4) R/o C-11/186, Yamuna Vihar, SC No. 11/2025 Mohit Panwar Vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi Page No. 1 of 6 -- 1 of 6 -- Delhi – 110053. 5. State Bank of India Gokulpuri, Delhi Service be effected through the Manager .............Respondents Date of institution of the petition : 08.04.2025 Date on which judgment was reserved : 22.09.2025 Date of pronouncement of judgment : 22.09.2025 Decision : Allowed PETITION FOR GRANT OF SUCCESSION CERTIFICATE UNDER SECTION 372 OF THE INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT. JUDGMENT 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner for issuance of succession certificate with respect to debts and securities of deceased Smt. Sumitra Devi, who had expired intestate on 17.11.1994. The Govt. of NCT of Delhi, Sh. Mahender Pal Panwar, Smt. Renu Panwar, Smt. Kamini Panwar and State Bank of India are made respondents in this case. 2. The present petition has been filed with respect to saving bank a/c no. 10086403007, in the name of deceased Smt. Sumitra Devi. 3. Service of notice of this petition was also effected upon general public through publication in newspapers i.e. 'The SC No. 11/2025 Mohit Panwar Vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi Page No. 2 of 6 -- 2 of 6 -- Statesman’, dated 20.08.2025 & ‘Rashtriya Sahara’, dated 20.08.2025. Till date, no objection for grant of certificate in favour of petitioner has been received from general public. 4. Accordingly, an enquiry was conducted and in the enquiry, verification report Ex. RW1/A (Colly. 13 pages) was filed on behalf of respondent no. 1 (examined as RW1) i.e. SDM, Yamuna Viha, Delhi regarding the LRs of deceased Smt. Sumitra Dev. As per the report, deceased left following surviving legal heirs: i. Sh. Mahender Pal Panwar Husband of deceased ii. Sh. Mohit Panwar Son of deceased iii. Smt. Renu Panwar Daughter of deceased iv. Smt. Kamini Panwar Daughter of deceased 5. Respondent no. 5, Sh. Vaibhav Kumar Gupta, Jr. Associate, State Bank of India was examined as RW-2. He brought the report from his branch with respect to saving bank a/c no. 10086403007 in the name of Late Smt. Sumitra Devi. He deposed that as per the report, an amount of Rs. 4,75,638/-(as on 09.06.2025) is payable to deceased. The said report to this effect is Ex. RW2/A(Colly. 04 pages). He deposed that the bank has no objection if succession certificate in respect of aforesaid amount is granted in favour of petitioner. The bank reserves its right to verify that all the conditions for early death benefits are fulfilled and then the bank would release the amount as per succession SC No. 11/2025 Mohit Panwar Vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi Page No. 3 of 6 -- 3 of 6 -- certificate. 6. Respondent no. 2, Sh. Mahender Pal Panwar (examined as RW3), respondent no. 3, Smt. Renu Panwar (examined as RW4) & respondent no. 4, Smt. Kamini Panwar (examined as RW5), have given their statement regarding their no objection if the succession certificate is issued in favour of the petitioner. 7. Petitioner no. 1 examined as PW1 and he relied upon the following documents to show her entitlement i.e. a. Copy of death certificate of deceased Smt. Sumitra Devi Ex. PW1/A (OSR). b. Publications reports Ex. PW1/B & Ex. PW1/C. c. Necessary report from SDM concerned Ex. RW1/A (Colly. 13 pages). d. The report received from concerned Bank Ex. RW2/A (Colly.04 Pages). e. Copy of Aadhar Card of Petitioner Ex. PW1/D (OSR). 8. That vide separate statement of the petitioner dt. 22.09.2025, petitioners’ evidence was closed. 9. I have heard Ld. counsel for the petitioner. Case file perused. SC No. 11/2025 Mohit Panwar Vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi Page No. 4 of 6 -- 4 of 6 -- 10. A certificate can be granted to an applicant if it is found that the rights in the securities belong to the applicant. As per Section 373(3), even if the Court is not able to decide the right to certificate without determining the question of law or fact which seem to be too intricate and difficult for determination in a summary proceeding, the certificate may nevertheless be granted to the applicant if he / she appears to be the person having prima- facia the best title therein. 11. Thus, from the averments made in the petition, report of SDM concerned Ex. RW1/A (Colly. 13 pages) and report received from concerned bank RW2/A(Colly. 04 pages) with respect to saving bank a/c no. 10086403007 of deceased in the present petition, I find that there is no legal embargo for issuance of succession certificate in favour of petitioner, who is class-I legal heir under Hindu Succession Act 1956, of the deceased Smt. Sumitra Devi with respect to saving bank a/c no. 10086403007, in the name of deceased Smt. Sumitra Devi , for an amount of Rs. 4,75,638/-(as on 09.06.2025), is payable to deceased. 12. Accordingly, petition is allowed and succession certificate be issued in favour of petitioner, for an amount of Rs. Rs. 4,75,638/-(as on 09.06.2025), payable to deceased Smt. Sumitra Devi, along with interest or any other amount as may be enhanced or reduced till date, on filing of requisite Court Fees in SC No. 11/2025 Mohit Panwar Vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi Page No. 5 of 6 -- 5 of 6 -- terms of Article 12, Schedule I of the Court Fee Act 1870 as applicable to Delhi along with indemnity bond with one surety in the like amount. 13. File be consigned to Record Room after due compliance. Announced in the open court (Animesh Bhaskar Mani Tripathi) on 22nd September, 2025 ACJ-cum-ARC-cum-CCJ North-East District, KKD, Delhi/22.09.2025 SC No. 11/2025 Mohit Panwar Vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi Page No. 6 of 6 -- 6 of 6 --
