DEENA NATH GUPTA +1 moreVsAnjali +2 more

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 7 Civ Suit 135/26
DEENA NATH GUPTA Vs. ANJALI
03.08.2026
Present: Sh. Mordhwaj Tiwari, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Garvit Vinayak, Ld. LAC for the defendant no.1
along with defendant no.1.
Defendant no.3 was dropped vide order dated
09.06.2026.
None for defendant no.2.
Defendant no. 2 has remained absent without cause.
None has appeared on behalf of defendant no.2 since
morning despite repeated calls. Same was the case on the last
date of hearing. It appears that defendant no.2 is not interested in
pursuing the present case. In view of the same, defendant no. 2 is
proceeded against ex-parte.
WS filed on behalf of defendant no.1. Copy
supplied.
List for replication if any/ completion of pleadings/
framing of isuses on 14.09.2026.
Pranat Kumar Joshi
ACJ-cum-ARC-cum-CCJ
North-East/Karkardooma Courts,
Delhi/03.08.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 5 Civ Suit 135/26
DEENA NATH GUPTA Vs. ANJALI
09.06.2026
Present: Sh. Mordhwaj Tiwari, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Defendant no. 1 in person.
Vide separate statement of Ld. Counsel for the
plaintiff the defendant no. 3 has been dropped from the array of
parties.
Amended memo of parties has been filed. Same be
taken on record.
Defendant no. 1 has appeared in person and submits
that they wish to avail services of DLSA for Legal
Representation. One opportunity is granted to the defendants to
approach DLSA and file WS on or before NDOH with advance
copy of the same be supplied to opposite party atleast one week
prior to NDOH against acknowledgment.
The plaintiff is at liberty to file replication if any
alongwith affidavit of admission and denial with advance copy to
defendant at least 3 days before NDOH.
List the matter for completion of pleading / framing
of issues on 03.08.2026.
Sh. Pranat Kumar Joshi
ACJ-cum-ARC-cum-CCJ
North-East/Karkardooma Courts,
Delhi/09.06.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 9 Civ Suit 135/26
DEENA NATH GUPTA Vs. ANJALI
18.05.2026
Present: None.
Summons and notice to D-1 and D-2 served through
whatsapp. Summons and notice remain unserved upon Defendant
no. 3.
Let fresh summons be issued on filing of PF through
all modes including e-modes. PF be filed within 7 days.
Let WS be filed within stipulated time with advance
copy to the opposite side at least 10 days prior to NDOH
alongwith affidavit of admission and denial.
The plaintiff is directed to file replication if any
alongwith affidavit of admission and denial with advance copy to
defendant at least 3 days before NDOH.
List the matter for completion of pleading / framing
of issues on 09.06.2026.
Summons be given dasti.
Pranat Kumar Joshi
ACJ-cum-ARC-cum-CCJ
North-East/Karkardooma Courts,
Delhi/18.05.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 16 Civ Suit 135/26
DEENA NATH GUPTA Vs. ANJALI
25.03.2026
Fresh case received by way of e-filing. It be checked and
registered as per rules.
Present: Sh. Mordhwaj Tiwari, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiffs.
Issue summons to the defendant for settlement of
issues through all modes including e-modes, on filing of PF/RC,
returnable for 18.05.2026.
Steps to be taken within 07 days.
Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff presses upon
application u/O 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC and requests ex-parte ad
interim injunction. It is a certain law that this is an exceptional
remedy to be granted only in rare cases where danger to the
subject matter and injury to the applicant is imminent.
Perusal of application and the plaint does not reveal
any imminent threat to the applicant. In view of the same ex-
parte ad interim injunction is not granted.
Let notice be issued to opposite parities to reply the
application u/O 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC.
Pranat Kumar Joshi
ACJ-cum-ARC-cum-CCJ
North-East/Karkardooma Courts,
Delhi/25.03.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 11 Civ Suit 135/26
DEENA NATH GUPTA Vs. ANJALI
14.09.2026
Present: Sh. Mordhwaj Tiwari, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Garvit Vinayak, Ld. LAC for the defendant no.
1.
Defendant no. 3 dropped on 09.06.2026.
Defendant no. 2 is already ex-parte.
Replication has been filed. Copy supplied. Same is
taken on record.
Ld. Counsel for the defendant no. 2 has appeared
seeks time to file vakalatnama and appropriate application.
Time is granted as last opportunity since defendant
no. 2 is already ex-parte.
List the matter for further proceedings / completion
of pleadings / framing of issues on 02.11.2026.
Pranat Kumar Joshi
ACJ-cum-ARC-cum-CCJ
North-East/Karkardooma Courts,
Delhi/14.09.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 7 Civ Suit 135/26
DEENA NATH GUPTA Vs. ANJALI
03.08.2026
Present: Sh. Mordhwaj Tiwari, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Garvit Vinayak, Ld. LAC for the defendant no.1
along with defendant no.1.
Defendant no.3 was dropped vide order dated
09.06.2026.
None for defendant no.2.
Defendant no. 2 has remained absent without cause.
None has appeared on behalf of defendant no.2 since
morning despite repeated calls. Same was the case on the last
date of hearing. It appears that defendant no.2 is not interested in
pursuing the present case. In view of the same, defendant no. 2 is
proceeded against ex-parte.
WS filed on behalf of defendant no.1. Copy
supplied.
List for replication if any/ completion of pleadings/
framing of isuses on 14.09.2026.
Pranat Kumar Joshi
ACJ-cum-ARC-cum-CCJ
North-East/Karkardooma Courts,
Delhi/03.08.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 5 Civ Suit 135/26
DEENA NATH GUPTA Vs. ANJALI
09.06.2026
Present: Sh. Mordhwaj Tiwari, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Defendant no. 1 in person.
Vide separate statement of Ld. Counsel for the
plaintiff the defendant no. 3 has been dropped from the array of
parties.
Amended memo of parties has been filed. Same be
taken on record.
Defendant no. 1 has appeared in person and submits
that they wish to avail services of DLSA for Legal
Representation. One opportunity is granted to the defendants to
approach DLSA and file WS on or before NDOH with advance
copy of the same be supplied to opposite party atleast one week
prior to NDOH against acknowledgment.
The plaintiff is at liberty to file replication if any
alongwith affidavit of admission and denial with advance copy to
defendant at least 3 days before NDOH.
List the matter for completion of pleading / framing
of issues on 03.08.2026.
Sh. Pranat Kumar Joshi
ACJ-cum-ARC-cum-CCJ
North-East/Karkardooma Courts,
Delhi/09.06.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 9 Civ Suit 135/26
DEENA NATH GUPTA Vs. ANJALI
18.05.2026
Present: None.
Summons and notice to D-1 and D-2 served through
whatsapp. Summons and notice remain unserved upon Defendant
no. 3.
Let fresh summons be issued on filing of PF through
all modes including e-modes. PF be filed within 7 days.
Let WS be filed within stipulated time with advance
copy to the opposite side at least 10 days prior to NDOH
alongwith affidavit of admission and denial.
The plaintiff is directed to file replication if any
alongwith affidavit of admission and denial with advance copy to
defendant at least 3 days before NDOH.
List the matter for completion of pleading / framing
of issues on 09.06.2026.
Summons be given dasti.
Pranat Kumar Joshi
ACJ-cum-ARC-cum-CCJ
North-East/Karkardooma Courts,
Delhi/18.05.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 16 Civ Suit 135/26
DEENA NATH GUPTA Vs. ANJALI
25.03.2026
Fresh case received by way of e-filing. It be checked and
registered as per rules.
Present: Sh. Mordhwaj Tiwari, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiffs.
Issue summons to the defendant for settlement of
issues through all modes including e-modes, on filing of PF/RC,
returnable for 18.05.2026.
Steps to be taken within 07 days.
Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff presses upon
application u/O 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC and requests ex-parte ad
interim injunction. It is a certain law that this is an exceptional
remedy to be granted only in rare cases where danger to the
subject matter and injury to the applicant is imminent.
Perusal of application and the plaint does not reveal
any imminent threat to the applicant. In view of the same ex-
parte ad interim injunction is not granted.
Let notice be issued to opposite parities to reply the
application u/O 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC.
Pranat Kumar Joshi
ACJ-cum-ARC-cum-CCJ
North-East/Karkardooma Courts,
Delhi/25.03.2026
-- 1 of 1 --