Full Order Text
Order 4 · 03 Feb 2025 · CNR DLNE030001402024
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: -1- 4 Civ Suit 107/24 Mohammad Danish Vs. Shri Munawwar Ali 03.02.2025 Present: Plaintiff in person. Sh. Ammar, Proxy Ld. Counsel for the defendant. A joint pass over is sought on behalf of both parties on the ground that the main counsels are busy in another court. Be awaited. (Dr. Saema Jain) JSCC/ASCJ/G. Judge(N/E) 03.02.2025 At 12:08 pm Present: Sh. Firoz Ahmed, ld. counsel for the plaintiffs. Sh. Mohd. Akram, ld. counsel for defendant no. 1 to 3. Arguments have been heard on behalf of both the parties on application under Order 7 Rule 11 r/w section 151 CPC. Record has been perused. By way of the present application, it has been argued by the defendant that the plaintiffs have no locus standi to file the present suit and that the plaintiffs are the tenants of the defendants. It is further argued that the present suit is merely a counter blast to the suit filed by the defendants against plaintiff no. 1 before the Ld. Court of SCJ, North-East, KKD under section 14 (1) (e) of DRC Act. Ld. counsel for the defendants has argued that there is no cause of action in favour of the plaintiffs and that the documents filed by the plaintiffs show that the suit is infructous. It is, therefore, prayed that the suit may be -- 1 of 3 -- -2- rejected with heavy costs as it has merely been filed to pressurize the defendants. Per contra, it is argued on behalf of the plaintiffs that the plaint clearly discloses a cause of action against the defendants and the application has been filed merely to delay the proceedings. It is settled law that while considering an application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC and the prayer for rejection of the plaint, only averments of plaint are material and can be taken into consideration and any evidence or averments made in the written statement cannot be considered. In Nusli Neville Wadia Vs. Ivory Properties and Ors. (2020) 6 SCC 557 (Judgment dated 04.10.2019), a reference judgment by a three-judge bench of Hon’ble Supreme Court, it has been noted as follows: “63...What is of significance under Order VII Rule 11 is that from the averments of plaint itself the suit is barred by any law and it would include limitation also including bar created by any other law for the time being in force. For the rejection of plaint, averments made by the defendant in the written statement or otherwise cannot be seen, only the averments of the plaint are material and can be taken into consideration and no other evidence.” In Ramisetty Venkatanna & Anr. Versus Nasyam Jamal Saheb & Ors. Civil Appeal No. 2717 of 2023 (Judgment dated 28.04.2023) Hon’ble Supreme Court has noted as follows: “7.1 Now so far as the reliance placed upon the decision of this Court in the case of Nusli Neville Wadia (supra) is concerned, again there cannot be any dispute with respect to the proposition of law laid down by this Court that while deciding the application under Order VII Rule XI, mainly the averments in the plaint -- 2 of 3 -- -3- only are required to be considered and not the averments in the written statement. ….” Upon a careful examination of the plaint, the application and the submissions made by both the parties, this court finds that the plaint contains sufficient averments and material particulars to disclose a cause of action. Whether the plaintiff’s claims are valid or sustainable is a matter to be decided after evidences are led and cannot be determined at this stage. The grounds raised by the defendants are beyond the scope of an application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. For the aforementioned reasons, the application under Order VII Rule 11 r/w section 151 CPC filed on behalf of the defendants is found to be meritless and is hereby dismissed. Be put up for further proceedings on 19.03.2025. (Dr. Saema Jain) JSCC/ASCJ/G. Judge(N/E) 03.02.2025 At 12:45 pm Present: Sh. Sandeep Kumar, ld. counsel for defendant no. 4. Ld. Counsel for defendant no. 4 has been apprised of the order passed. Be put up on date already fixed i.e. 19.03.2025. (Dr. Saema Jain) JSCC/ASCJ/G. Judge(N/E) 03.02.2025 -- 3 of 3 --
