Full Order Text
Final Order 25 · 17 Mar 2026 · CNR DLNE030000672024
Order Details: COPY OF JUDGMENT Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF SH. PRANAT KUMAR JOSHI ACJ-CUM-ARC-CUM-CCJ, NORTH EAST DISTRICT: KARKARDOOMA COURTS, DELHI DLNE030000672024 CS No.50/2024 Sh. Rajesh Gupta S/o Sh. Gauri Shnakar Gupta, R/o T-135/A, Gali No.9, Gautam Puri Garhi Mendu North-East, Delhi-110053 …...Plaintiff Versus Sh. Vinod Kumar S/o Sh. Dwarkadheesh R/o E-10/B-389, C.P.J., New Seelampur, near Vicki Ande Wala Delhi-110053 ......Defendant Date of Institution : 03.02.2024 Date of reserving the judgment : 16.03.2026 Date of Judgment : 17.03.2026 Decision : Decreed _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Case no. 50/2024 Rajesh Gupta Vs. Vinod Kumar Page No. 1/4 Object 1 -- 1 of 4 -- SUIT UNDER ORDER XXXVII OF CPC FOR RECOVERY OF Rs.60,000/- ALONG WITH INTEREST @ 18% P.A. JUDGMENT 1. Plaintiff has filed the present suit under Order 37 CPC for recovery of Rs. 60,000/- alongwith pendente lite and future interest @ 18% per annum w.e.f. 10.01.2022 till the date of actual payment. 2. Plaintiff has briefly stated that in September, 2021 the defendant, being in financial crisis, approached him for financial help and accordingly the plaintiff advanced a friendly loan of Rs.60,000/- repayable within three months. It is the further case of the plaintiff that a written loan agreement dated 10.09.2021 was executed between the parties. The plaintiff claims that despite repeated demands and issuance of legal notice dated 08.01.2024, the defendant failed to repay the loan. Hence the present suit under Order XXXVII CPC filed. 3. Defendant has appeared in response to summons for judgment and filed an application for leave to defend which was allowed vide order dated 21.08.2025. Despite directions of this court, WS was not filed by the defendant and due to non-appearance, defendant proceeded ex parte vide order dated 20.12.2025 and matter proceeded for ex parte PE. Ex parte evidence: - 4. In ex-parte PE, to his case, plaintiff deposed as PW1. Plaintiff tendered his ex-parte evidence by way of affidavit as Ex.PW1/A, bearing his signature at point A and B wherein he reiterated the facts mentioned in _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Case no. 50/2024 Rajesh Gupta Vs. Vinod Kumar Page No. 2/4 -- 2 of 4 -- plaint and relied upon following documents:- 1. Loan agreement dated 10.09.2021 Ex.PW1/1 2. Legal notice dated 08.01.2024 Ex.PW1/2 3. Receipt of Indian Postal Receipt dated 09.01.2024 Ex.PW1/3 4. Internet delivery report Ex.PW1/4, de-exhibited as Mark B. 5. Thereafter, ex-parte PE was closed on 04.02.2026 and matter was listed for ex-parte final arguments. 6. I have heard the ex-parte final arguments on behalf of the plaintiff and perused the record. Decision with reasons:- 7. The only issue which needs adjudication in this matter is whether plaintiff has proved its case or not. Plaintiff has brought Loan agreement dated 10.09.2021 Ex.PW1/1, Legal notice Ex.PW1/2, Receipt of Indian Postal receipt Ex.PW1/3 and Internet delivery report to prove the recovery amount. 8. This suit was filed within limitation period and within proper jurisdiction. Thus, in view of unrebutted testimony of plaintiff, there appears no bar in decreeing the suit in favour of plaintiff. Therefore, in my _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Case no. 50/2024 Rajesh Gupta Vs. Vinod Kumar Page No. 3/4 -- 3 of 4 -- opinion plaintiff has been successfully able to establish his case. 9. The plaintiff has claimed interest at the rate of 18% per annum. However, in the considered opinion of this Court, interest @ 18 % per annum is on a higher side. This Court is of the view that the plaintiff will be sufficiently compensated if simple interest @ 6 % p.a. is granted to it. Hence, the plaintiff is only entitled to simple interest @ 6 % per annum on the principle sum of Rs. 60,000/- from the date of filing of suit till decision of this case i.e. 17.03.2026. Relief: 10. Thus, the suit of plaintiff is decreed without costs for sum of Rs. 60,000/- with simple interest @ 6 % p. a from the date of filing of suit till decision of this court. 11. Decree sheet be prepared accordingly and file be consigned to the Record Room after due compliance. Announced in the open court (Pranat Kumar Joshi) on 17rd March 2026 ACJ-cum-ARC-cum-CCJ North-East District, KKD, Delhi _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Case no. 50/2024 Rajesh Gupta Vs. Vinod Kumar Page No. 4/4 -- 4 of 4 --
