Interim Order 6

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 27 CC NI ACT / 1025/2025
Ravi Tomer Vs. Pradeep Kumar
(KARAWAL NAGAR)
CNR No. DLNE020085072025
19.08.2026
(VC proceedings through CISCO Webex)
Present: Complainant with ld counsel Sh. Rajeev Jain.
Sh. Vinay Atri, proxy counsel for the proposed accused.
Arguments on cognizance and summoned heard.
COGNIZANCE AND SUMMONING ORDER
(1) This is a complaint filed for offence punishable under Section 138 N. I. Act.
Complaint, affidavit of evidence and other annexed documents perused. I take cognizance of
the said offence.
(2) The Hon’ble Supreme Court in A. C. Narayanan Vs. State of Maharashtra
& Anr.” (2014) 11 SCC 790, has given discretion to the Magistrate to rely on the complaint,
documents annexed and the affidavit submitted by complainant in deciding whether or not to
issue process. u/s. 200 CrPC and it is not mandatory to examine upon oath the complainant or
its witnesses in order to decide the same. Upon considering the instant complaint, documents
produced and verification in the form of affidavit of evidence, there are sufficient grounds for
proceeding further against accused for offence punishable under Section 138 N. I. Act.
Accused is prima facie responsible, being the drawer of the cheque in dispute.
(3) In terms of inquiry conducted under Section 225 BNSS, all the statutory requirements
have been complied with. The complaint is filed within the period of limitation. I am also
prima facie satisfied that the offence has been committed within the jurisdiction of this court.
Since the proxy counsel for the accused has entered into appearance, the
service of summons in the present matter is dispensed with and the summons is deemed to be
served upon the accused.
Copy of complaint be supplied at 8447790581.
Put up for framing of notice/appearance of accused on 06.01.2027.
(SANJANA KASANA)
JMFC(NI ACT)/NE/KKD
Court/DELHI/19.08.2026
-- 1 of 1 --