Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 09 May 2025 · CNR DLNE020051112025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: BAIL MATTERS 128/2025 SAMIRUDDIN Vs. STATE FIR No. 8011601/2024 (Crime Branch-N.E.Delhi) 09.05.2025 Present: Sh. Shreyas Pragyan, Ld. APP for the State. Sh. Ashish Tripathi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant/ accused Samiruddin. IO SI Birpal is present. This is bail application filed u/s 480 BNSS on behalf of the accused/applicant Samiruddin. Ld. Counsel for the applicant/accused has submitted that accused is in custody since 14.04.2025. He is sole earning member of the family. Nothing has been recovered from the accused/ applicant. Investigation is complete and no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the applicant behind the bars. It is further submitted that accused shall abide by terms and conditions of bail, if the present application is allowed. Reply filed by the IO. Perused. Bail application is opposed by the Ld. APP for the State on the grounds that investigation is at initial stage. In the case titled Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra [(2011) 1 SCC 694 : (2011) 1 SCC (Cri) 514] , Hon'ble Supreme Court has observed that: (SCC p. 728, para 84) “84. Just as liberty is precious to an individual, so is the society's interest in maintenance of peace, law and order. Both are equally important.” -- 1 of 2 -- Keeping in view that gravity of allegations and the fact that investigation is at initial stage in the present matter, this court in the interest of justice and to ensure that the investigation is carried out in a proper manner, does not deem it fit to grant bail to the accused at this stage. Hence, application stands dismissed. Application stands disposed off. Copy of the order be given dasti to Ld. Counsel for accused, as prayed for. (VAIBHAV MEHTA) CJM, North East District, KKD Courts / Delhi-09.05.2025 -- 2 of 2 --
