Order 1

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 39 CC NI ACT / 621/2026
THE HARITASH COOPERATIVE U THRIFT AND CREDIT SOCIETY LTD Vs.
SHOKIN /0
(Gokul Puri)
09.04.2026
(VC proceedings through CISCO Webex)
Present: Sh. Chandrakant Joshi, Ld Counsel for the complainant.
Arguments on cognizance and summoning heard.
COGNIZANCE AND SUMMONING ORDER
(1) This is a complaint filed for offence punishable under Section 138 N. I.
Act. Complaint, affidavit of evidence and other annexed documents perused. I take
cognizance of the said offence.
(2) The Hon’ble Supreme Court in A. C. Narayanan Vs. State of
Maharashtra & Anr.” (2014) 11 SCC 790, has given discretion to the Magistrate to
rely on the complaint, documents annexed and the affidavit submitted by complainant in
deciding whether or not to issue process. u/s. 200 CrPC and it is not mandatory to
examine upon oath the complainant or its witnesses in order to decide the same. Upon
considering the instant complaint, documents produced and verification in the form of
affidavit of evidence, there are sufficient grounds for proceeding further against accused
for offence punishable under Section 138 N. I. Act. Accused is prima facie responsible,
being the drawer and signatory of the cheque in dispute.
(3) In terms of inquiry conducted under Section 225 BNSS, all the statutory
requirements have been complied with. The complaint is filed within the period of
limitation. I am also prima facie satisfied that the offence has been committed within the
jurisdiction of this court.
Hence, issue summons against the accused on PF/RC/Approved Courier.
Service be also effected on the email and whatsApp message(s), as provided by the
complainant and further subject to filing of report of service. Necessary particulars be
filed on affidavit within 7 days. For facilitation of the same, dasti summons are
permitted. The process server is directed to serve the summons by way of affixation in
terms of Sec. 67 BNSS if premises found closed or same could not be served personally
or on any adult male member.
(4) As per the guidelines laid down in Damodar S. Prabhu Vs. Sayed
Babalal H, AIR 2010 (SC) 1907, Ahlmad is directed to make a mention on the
summons issued against the accused (by adding separate sheet, if required) that
“accused can make an application for compounding of the offence at the first and
second hearing of the case and if such an application is made, compounding may be
allowed by the Court without imposing any costs on the accused.”
(5) Ahlmad is also directed to mention the official email id and video
conferencing link of this Court on the summons. Complainant is directed to file PF and
take steps within 07 days including providing copy(ies) of complaint otherwise the
complaint may be dismissed u/s 227(4) of BNSS The complainant is also apprised of the
fact that at the time of filing 1 st PF, he is required to mandatorily fill the Meta Deta
form.
At request, put up for report/appearance of accused on 07.09.2026.
P.A. is directed to do updation of the case and upload the order as per
rules.
(NISHTHA MEHTANI)
JMFC(NI ACT)/NE/KKD
DELHI/09.04.2026
-- 1 of 1 --