TrustJury record updated 19 Oct 2026
Not available
Date: 19-03-2024 Business: FURTHER PROCEEDING Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance Next Hearing Date: 06-04-2024 Date: 06-04-2024 Business: ATR Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance Next Hearing Date: 27-05-2024 Date: 27-05-2024 Business: a Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance Next Hearing Date: 21-09-2024 Date: 21-09-2024 Business: FURTHER PROCEEDING Next Purpose: Misc./ Arguments Next Hearing Date: 03-12-2024 Date: 03-12-2024 Date: 26-04-2025 Business: PSE Next Purpose: Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence Next Hearing Date: 22-09-2025 Date: 22-09-2025 Business: PSE Next Purpose: Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence Next Hearing Date: 24-02-2026 Date: 24-02-2026 Business: DISMISSED AS WITHDRWAN Nature Of Disposal: DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN Disposal Date: 24-02-2026
Filing Number: 2533/2024 Filing Date: 18-03-2024 First Hearing Date: 19th March 2024 Decision Date: 24th February 2026 Court Number And Judge: 63-Judicial Magistrate First Class-02
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 41 CT Cases 256/2024 SUSHILA Vs. SATENDER KUMAR @SAURAV AND ORS. /0 (New Usmanpur) 24.02.2026 Present: Ms. Sudha Nim, counsel for the complainant. It is submitted by counsel that she has instructions to withdraw the present matter. Accordingly, present matter is dismissed as withdrawn. File be consigned to record room after due compliance. (Anmol Nohria) JMFC-02/NE/KKD Courts/Delhi/24.02.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CT Cases256/2024 SUSHILA Vs. SATENDER KUMAR@SAURAV AND ORS. /0 (New Usman Pur) 22.09.2025 Present: Ms. Sudha Naim counsel for the complainant. At request matter is adjourned. Put up for PSE on 24.02.2026. (Anmol Nohria) JMFC-02/NE/KKD Courts/Delhi/22.09.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: CT Cases 256/2024 SUSHILA Vs. SATENDER KUMAR @SAURAV AND ORS. (New Usman Pur) 26.04.2025 Present: Ms. Sudha Nim counsel for the complainant. At request of counsel matter is adjourned. Put up for PSE on 22.09.2025. (Anmol Nohria) JMFC-02/NE/KKD Courts/Delhi/26.04.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: CIS no. 256/24 PS-New Usmanpur Sushila vs. Satender Kumar @ Saurav & Ors. -7- Since the complainant is alleging commission of offences as mentioned in his complaint against proposed accused persons, therefore, complainant is given an opportunity to prove his case by leading evidence. Cognizance taken. Now put up for PSE on 26.04.2025. Dasti copy of order be given as prayed for. (Anmol Nohria) JMFC-02/NE/KKD Courts/Delhi/03.12.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: CIS no. 256/24 PS-New Usmanpur Sushila vs. Satender Kumar @ Saurav & Ors. -6- 11. In totality of circumstances, this is not a fit case for invoking powers under Section 156 (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and for directing the SHO of concerned police station to register FIR for the following reasons : - a. The identity of the accused persons is already known. b. No facts are to be…
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: CIS no. 256/24 PS-New Usmanpur Sushila vs. Satender Kumar @ Saurav & Ors. -5- “24. Regard being had to the above-said enunciation of law, it needs to be reiterated that the Learned Magistrate has to remain vigilant with regard to allegations made and the nature of allegations and not to issue directions without proper application of mind. He has also to bear in mind that sending the matter would be conducive to justice…
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: CIS no. 256/24 PS-New Usmanpur Sushila vs. Satender Kumar @ Saurav & Ors. -4- 05. Remedy under Section 156 (3) Cr. P.C. is a discretionary one as the provision proceeds with the word 'may'. The Magistrate is required to exercise his mind while doing so and pass orders only if he is satisfied that the information reveals commission of cognizable offence/offences and also about necessity of police investigation for digging out of evidence…
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: CIS no. 256/24 PS-New Usmanpur Sushila vs. Satender Kumar @ Saurav & Ors. -3- 5. In the case of “Sukwasi Vs. State of Uttar Pardesh” 2008 Cri. L. J. 472, Division Bench of Hon'ble High Court of Allahabad has held that merely because a complaint discloses a cognizable offence, application under Section 156 (3) of The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is not bound to be allowed. The following observations are relevant :…
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: CIS no. 256/24 PS-New Usmanpur Sushila vs. Satender Kumar @ Saurav & Ors. -2- despite the PCR call and MLC of the complainant. Aggrieved by the inaction of the police, the complainant approached DCP, North-East and filed a written complaint on 06.09.2023 upon which no action has been taken. Aggrieved the complainant has approached this Court. 2. Action Taken Report as per judgment of Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in matter of “Subhkaran…
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: CIS no. 256/24 PS-New Usmanpur Sushila vs. Satender Kumar @ Saurav & Ors. 03.12.2024 Present: Ms. Sudha Nim counsel for the complainant. Put up for order at 4:00 pm. (Anmol Nohria) JMFC-02/NE/KKD Courts/Delhi/03.12.2024 At 04:00 pm. Present: None for the complainant. Order under section 156 (3) Cr. PC 1. Briefly stated the facts of the present complaint are that on 28.08.2023 at about 3:30 pm when the complainant went to the house of…
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CC No.256/24 PS New Usmanpur Sushila vs. Satender Kumar @ Saurav & Ors. 21.09.2024 Present: Complainant in person with counsel Ms. Sudha Nim. Fresh vakalatnama on behalf of complainant filed. Be taken on record. All the previous vakalatnamas are hereby discharged. Adjournment has been sought stating that she has been newly engaged. Put up on 03.12.2024. (Vipul Sandwar) JMFC-02/NE/KKD Courts/Delhi/21.09.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CC No.256/24 PS New Usmanpur Sushila vs. Satender Kumar @ Saurav & Ors. 27.05.2024 Present: Sh. Aftab Fazil, counsel for the complainant. ATR has been filed. Copy of the same be supplied. To come up for arguments on 21.09.2024. (Vipul Sandwar) MM-02/NE/KKD Courts/Delhi/27.05.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CC No.256/24 PS New Usmanpur Sushila vs. Satender Kumar @ Saurav & Ors. 06.04.2024 Present: Sh. Aftab Fazil, Counsel for the complainant. Heard on application under section 156(3) Cr. PC. Documents perused. SHO, PS New Usmanpur is directed to file an action taken report stating the following: (1) Whether any complaint has been made/received by the complainant in the police station? (2) If yes, whether any action has been taken on the complaint? (3) Whether as a result of investigation/inquiry, any cognizable offence has been made out against the accused person(s) and whether any action has been taken by the police? (4) If yes, whether any FIR has been registered and status of investigation? (5) If no cognizable offence is made out, whether the complainant has been informed accordingly? Copy of the complaint alongwith annexures is supplied to Nayab Court, PS New Usmanpur today. Put up on 27.05.2024. (Vipul Sandwar) MM-02/NE/KKD Courts/Delhi/06.04.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CC No.256/24 PS New Usmanpur Sushila vs. Satender Kumar @ Saurav & Ors. 19.03.2024 Fresh complaint case under section 200 Cr. PC read with section 156 (3) Cr. PC filed. It be checked and registered as per rules. Present: None for the complainant. Put up for consideration on 06.04.2024. (Vipul Sandwar) MM-02/NE/KKD Courts/Delhi/19.03.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CT Cases256/2024 SUSHILA Vs. SATENDER KUMAR@SAURAV AND ORS. /0 (New Usman Pur) 22.09.2025 Present: Ms. Sudha Naim counsel for the complainant. At request matter is adjourned. Put up for PSE on 24.02.2026. (Anmol Nohria) JMFC-02/NE/KKD Courts/Delhi/22.09.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: CT Cases 256/2024 SUSHILA Vs. SATENDER KUMAR @SAURAV AND ORS. (New Usman Pur) 26.04.2025 Present: Ms. Sudha Nim counsel for the complainant. At request of counsel matter is adjourned. Put up for PSE on 22.09.2025. (Anmol Nohria) JMFC-02/NE/KKD Courts/Delhi/26.04.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: CIS no. 256/24 PS-New Usmanpur Sushila vs. Satender Kumar @ Saurav & Ors. -7- Since the complainant is alleging commission of offences as mentioned in his complaint against proposed accused persons, therefore, complainant is given an opportunity to prove his case by leading evidence. Cognizance taken. Now put up for PSE on 26.04.2025. Dasti copy of order be given as prayed for. (Anmol Nohria) JMFC-02/NE/KKD Courts/Delhi/03.12.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: CIS no. 256/24 PS-New Usmanpur Sushila vs. Satender Kumar @ Saurav & Ors. -6- 11. In totality of circumstances, this is not a fit case for invoking powers under Section 156 (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and for directing the SHO of concerned police station to register FIR for the following reasons : - a. The identity of the accused persons is already known. b. No facts are to be…
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: CIS no. 256/24 PS-New Usmanpur Sushila vs. Satender Kumar @ Saurav & Ors. -5- “24. Regard being had to the above-said enunciation of law, it needs to be reiterated that the Learned Magistrate has to remain vigilant with regard to allegations made and the nature of allegations and not to issue directions without proper application of mind. He has also to bear in mind that sending the matter would be conducive to justice…
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: CIS no. 256/24 PS-New Usmanpur Sushila vs. Satender Kumar @ Saurav & Ors. -4- 05. Remedy under Section 156 (3) Cr. P.C. is a discretionary one as the provision proceeds with the word 'may'. The Magistrate is required to exercise his mind while doing so and pass orders only if he is satisfied that the information reveals commission of cognizable offence/offences and also about necessity of police investigation for digging out of evidence…
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: CIS no. 256/24 PS-New Usmanpur Sushila vs. Satender Kumar @ Saurav & Ors. -3- 5. In the case of “Sukwasi Vs. State of Uttar Pardesh” 2008 Cri. L. J. 472, Division Bench of Hon'ble High Court of Allahabad has held that merely because a complaint discloses a cognizable offence, application under Section 156 (3) of The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is not bound to be allowed. The following observations are relevant :…
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: CIS no. 256/24 PS-New Usmanpur Sushila vs. Satender Kumar @ Saurav & Ors. -2- despite the PCR call and MLC of the complainant. Aggrieved by the inaction of the police, the complainant approached DCP, North-East and filed a written complaint on 06.09.2023 upon which no action has been taken. Aggrieved the complainant has approached this Court. 2. Action Taken Report as per judgment of Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in matter of “Subhkaran…
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: CIS no. 256/24 PS-New Usmanpur Sushila vs. Satender Kumar @ Saurav & Ors. 03.12.2024 Present: Ms. Sudha Nim counsel for the complainant. Put up for order at 4:00 pm. (Anmol Nohria) JMFC-02/NE/KKD Courts/Delhi/03.12.2024 At 04:00 pm. Present: None for the complainant. Order under section 156 (3) Cr. PC 1. Briefly stated the facts of the present complaint are that on 28.08.2023 at about 3:30 pm when the complainant went to the house of…
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CC No.256/24 PS New Usmanpur Sushila vs. Satender Kumar @ Saurav & Ors. 21.09.2024 Present: Complainant in person with counsel Ms. Sudha Nim. Fresh vakalatnama on behalf of complainant filed. Be taken on record. All the previous vakalatnamas are hereby discharged. Adjournment has been sought stating that she has been newly engaged. Put up on 03.12.2024. (Vipul Sandwar) JMFC-02/NE/KKD Courts/Delhi/21.09.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CC No.256/24 PS New Usmanpur Sushila vs. Satender Kumar @ Saurav & Ors. 27.05.2024 Present: Sh. Aftab Fazil, counsel for the complainant. ATR has been filed. Copy of the same be supplied. To come up for arguments on 21.09.2024. (Vipul Sandwar) MM-02/NE/KKD Courts/Delhi/27.05.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CC No.256/24 PS New Usmanpur Sushila vs. Satender Kumar @ Saurav & Ors. 06.04.2024 Present: Sh. Aftab Fazil, Counsel for the complainant. Heard on application under section 156(3) Cr. PC. Documents perused. SHO, PS New Usmanpur is directed to file an action taken report stating the following: (1) Whether any complaint has been made/received by the complainant in the police station? (2) If yes, whether any action has been taken on the complaint? (3) Whether as a result of investigation/inquiry, any cognizable offence has been made out against the accused person(s) and whether any action has been taken by the police? (4) If yes, whether any FIR has been registered and status of investigation? (5) If no cognizable offence is made out, whether the complainant has been informed accordingly? Copy of the complaint alongwith annexures is supplied to Nayab Court, PS New Usmanpur today. Put up on 27.05.2024. (Vipul Sandwar) MM-02/NE/KKD Courts/Delhi/06.04.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CC No.256/24 PS New Usmanpur Sushila vs. Satender Kumar @ Saurav & Ors. 19.03.2024 Fresh complaint case under section 200 Cr. PC read with section 156 (3) Cr. PC filed. It be checked and registered as per rules. Present: None for the complainant. Put up for consideration on 06.04.2024. (Vipul Sandwar) MM-02/NE/KKD Courts/Delhi/19.03.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
