Skip to main content
Court Order

Order 3

CNR DLNE02002383202605 Jun 2026
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Order 3 · 05 Jun 2026 · CNR DLNE020023832026

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF SH. TUSHAR GUPTA, ACJM/NORTH-
EAST, KARKARDOOMA COURTS, DELHI
7 CT Cases / 159/2026 MUNAWWAR ALI Vs. THE NCT OF
DELHI /0 (Sonia Vihar)
05.06.2026
Present: Complainant in person with counsel.
Matter is fixed for argument.
Arguments heard on application u/s 175(3) BNSS.
Put up for order at 04:00 pm.
(TUSHAR GUPTA)
ACJM/NE/KKD Courts
05.06.2026
At 04:00 pm.
Present: None for complainant.
Vide present application, there has been a dispute
regarding the supply of scrap materials. It is alleged by the
complainant that he transferred Rs.50,000/- from his bank account
and paid in cash Rs.42,000/- to respondent No. 2 Jahid, however no
scrap material was supplied to him nor his amount was returned.
Being aggrieved, complainant made a complaint to SHO PS Sonia
Vihar and to the higher authorities i.e. DCP but despite that, no
steps were taken by the concerned police officials. Complainant
accordingly prays for registration of FIR against proposed accused
persons.
2. ATR was filed by the IO.
Cont…
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
3. I have given my thoughtful consideration to the
contentions of the complainant and have gone through the record as
well as perused the report.
4. From the perusal of the facts of the present complaint,
material on record and after hearing the submissions of Ld.
Counsel for the complainant, there appears no need to invoke
Section 175 (3) BNSS for issuing directions to register FIR against
the proposed accused persons. No facts need to be unearthed as all
the facts and circumstances of the case also appear to be within the
knowledge of the complainant. The evidence is well within the
reach of the complainant and no assistance of police is required to
gather the same. Further, the custodial interrogation of the alleged
accused persons is not necessary and the facts of the case are not
such that would warrant a detailed and complex investigations to
be carried out by the State Agency. Thus, in the facts of the present
case, I do not consider it fit to order for registration of FIR. The
application U/s 175 (3) BNSS is hereby dismissed. The
complainant is however at liberty to proceed with his complaint
U/s 223 BNSS and to lead pre-summoning evidence. It may be
noted that in case any police enquiry is deemed necessary at a later
stage, recourse to Section 225 BNSS can be taken at that stage.
Put up for PSE on 02.09.2026.
(TUSHAR GUPTA)
ACJM/NE/KKD Courts
05.06.2026
-- 2 of 2 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.