Order 6

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 7 CA / 169/2025
ASHISH JAIN Vs. MANOJ JAIN
(Bhajan Pura)
26.02.2026
Present: Sh. Yunus Qureshi, Ld. Counsel for appellant alongwith
appellant.
Sh. Sandeep Kumar, Ld. Counsel for respondent alongwith
respondent. .
The present appeal assails judgment dated 22.10.2024
passed by Ld. Trial Court whereby, the complaint of appellant filed u/s
138 of NI Act was dismissed by the court and the respondent was
acquitted for the alleged offence. The appeal in question was also
accompanied with an application seeking condonation of delay.
However, inadvertently, the application for condonation of
delay could not be heard and both the sides directly addressed their
arguments on the main appeal.
On the LDOH, the abovesaid mistake came to the notice of
the court and accordingly, the matter was directed to be listed for hearing
on the application of the appellant seeking condonation of delay for
today.
Accordingly, the application of the appellant seeking
condonation of delay in filing of the present appeal is taken up for
hearing.
Submissions are heard on the application from both the
sides.
-- 1 of 2 --
Since while making his submissions on behalf of the
respondent, the Ld. Counsel for respondent has stated in the court that
the respondent has no objection if the application of the appellant for
condonation of delay is allowed subject to imposition of reasonable cost
and the matter is heard on its merit, the application filed by the appellant
seeking condonation of delay in filing of the present appeal stands
allowed subject to payment of cost of Rs. 10,000/- by the appellant to the
respondent.
The cost accordingly stands paid.
Arguments are heard on the appeal from both the sides.
At request, put up for further arguments on 12.03.2026.
Both the sides are also at liberty to file their written
submissions, if any, by the NDOH.
(BALWINDER SINGH)
ASJ (FTC)/North-
East/KKD Courts/
Delhi/26.02.2026
-- 2 of 2 --