Order 4

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 4 CA / 168/2025
Hans Raj Vs. Nagendra Sharma
(Bhajan Pura)
24.12.2025
Present: Sh. Vikram Singh Bhatia, Ld. LAC for appellant alongwith
appellant.
Sh. B. L. Garg, Ld. Counsel for respondent alongwith
respondent.
Record perused.
Vide order dated 16.09.2025, while suspending the
execution of the sentence awarded by the Ld. Trial Court vide the
impugned and judgment and order on sentence, this court had directed
the accused to deposit 20% of the fine/compensation amount as directed
by the Ld. Trial Court.
However, the record reveals that till date, the appellant has
not made the compliance of the said directions.
Today, it is submitted by the Ld. LAC for the appellant that
the appellant is his financial hardship and due to lack of resources he is
even unable to engage any advocate on his own due to which he has
been provided with free legal aid. Accordingly, he has requested that the
appellant may be exempted from depositing the 20% of
fine/compensation amount as was directed by this court vide order dated
16.09.2025.
The Ld. Counsel for respondent has also not opposed the
submissions of the Ld. LAC for the appellant and has stated that the
court may pass such order as it may deem fit.
-- 1 of 2 --
Submissions heard.
Considering the submissions made by Ld. LAC for the
appellant, the appellant is exempted from the depositing the 20% of
fine/compensation amount as was directed vide order dated 16.09.2025.
Arguments are heard on appeal from both the sides.
Put up for clarification, if any,/order on 16.01.2026.
(BALWINDER SINGH)
ASJ (FTC)/North-
East/KKD Courts/
Delhi/24.12.2025
-- 2 of 2 --