Order 3

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS 215/24
RAVINDER KUMAR Vs. GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI
07.11.2024
Present: Sh. Praveen Kumar, Ld. counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Deepak Agarwal, Ld. counsel for D-2.
Ms. Anuja Pethia, Ld. counsel for D-3 through VC.
Ld. counsel for D-4 through VC.
Sh. Ashok Kumar, Kanungo on behalf of D-5.
None for other defendants.
None has appeared for D-1 on the last date. None appears
today. It appears that D-1 is not interested in contesting the present matter
and is accordingly proceeded ex-parte.
D-2 and D-4 have not filed any WS till date despite expiry of
statutory time. The said defendants seek time to file the same. Let the same
be done as per law.
D-2 has also moved an application u/O VII Rule 11 CPC
seeking rejection of plaint on the ground of limitation. Copy supplied. Let
reply to the said application be filed before NDOH with advance copy to
other side.
D-3 claims to have filed its WS. The same has not come on
record. As per counsel for D-3, the same was filed through e-mode. Let
Ahlmad bring the copy of the same on record and D-3 may also take steps
to bring the WS of D-3 on record. I am told that an application u/o VII Rule
11 CPC has also been moved by D-3. Let the samebe also brought on
record.
Copy stated to have not been supplied. Let copy of the said
documents of D-3 be supplied to plaintiff.Plantiff to file reply of the said
-- 1 of 2 --
application before NDOH.
D-5 has moved an application seeking its deletion from the
array of parties along with WS. Mr. Ashok Kumar submits that
inadvertently, in the application and WS filed, D-5 is stated as D-6. There is
no D-6 in the matter and on the oral submission of Mr. Kumar, the title of
the application and WS shall be read to have been filed on behalf of D-5.
Let reply to application of D-5 be also filed by plaintiff.
To come up for arguments on all pending applications on
23.01.2025.
AASHISH GUPTA
DJ-01/NE/KKD/DELHI
07.11.2024
-- 2 of 2 --