Full Order Text
Final Order 5 · 08 Oct 2026 · CNR DLNE010005002026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDGMENT Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF AASHISH GUPTA, DISTRICT JUDGE-01, NORTH EAST, KARKARDOOMA COURTS: DELHI CS 56/2026 CNR No: DLNE010005002026 In the matter of :- Satish Chauhan S/o Sh. Chandgi Ram R/o J-194/95, New Seelampur, Delhi-110053 .........Plaintiff Versus Anil Kumar S/o Sh. Mirari Lal R/o J-30, New Seelampur, Delhi-110053 .........Defendant. Date of institution : 12.02.2026 Arguments heard on : 08.10.2026 Date of Judgment : 08.10.2026 JUDGMENT 1. It is plaintiff's case he had inducted the defendant as a tenant in his property bearing No. J-30, New Seelampur, Delhi-110053 having two room set on first floor (hereinafter referred as ‘suit property’ and more specifically shown in site plan annexed to the plaint). 2. The said tenancy initially commenced from 28.10.2023 at an initial rent of Rs. 9000/- per month. This was vide agreement-1 dated 27.10.2023. This agreement came to an end by efflux of time on 27.09.2024. CS No. 56/26 Satish Chauhan Vs. Anil Kumar Page No. 1 of 5 -- 1 of 5 -- 3. Thereafter, parties entered into two other agreements i.e. agreement-2 (dated 17.09.2024 for the period 28.09.2024 to 27.03.2025) and agreement-3 (dated 17.03.2025 for the period 27.03.2025 to 26.02.2026). The rate of rent agreed in the said agreements was Rs. 9500/- per month. 4. It is plaintiff’s case that under the last agreement i.e. agreement- 3, it is recorded that an arrears of Rs. 1,17,000/- are due qua the previous two agreements. 5. Plaintiff claims that the aforesaid money alongwith rent payable under the third agreement was not paid to plaintiff and this led him to terminate the tenancy of defendant vide legal notice dated 29.10.2025. 6. Plaintiff is thus before this Court seeking (a) possession of tenanted premises; (b) arrears of rent amounting to Rs. 2,01,500/- w.e.f 28.11.2023 calculated uptil 27.01.2026 (i.e. just before filing of the present suit); and mesne profits @ Rs. 9,500/- per month w.e.f. 28.01.2026 till possession is given to plaintiff. 7. Despite service, defendant never entered appearance to contest the matter and remained ex-parte through out trial. 8. Plaintiff stepped in the witness box as PW-1 and placed on record his affidavit in evidence Ex. PW1/A and proved on record the following documents: CS No. 56/26 Satish Chauhan Vs. Anil Kumar Page No. 2 of 5 -- 2 of 5 -- S.No Exhibit/Mark Date of Exhibit Description of Exhibit 1. Ex. PW1/1 07.08.2026 Site plan. 2. Ex. PW1/2 07.08.2026 Rent agreement dated 27.10.2023. 3. Ex. PW1/3 07.08.2026 Second rent agreement dated 17.09.2024. 4. Ex. PW1/4 07.08.2026 Third rent agreement dated 17.03.2025. 5. Ex. PW1/5 07.08.2026 Aadhar Card of plaintiff. 6. Ex. PW1/6 07.08.2026 Legal notice dated 29.10.2025. 7. Ex. PW1/7 07.08.2026 Postal receipt. 8. Ex. PW1/8 07.08.2026 Aadhar card of Anil Kumar 9. I have heard arguments advanced by Ld Counsel for plaintiff and have carefully perused the record. 10. Plaintiff has proved on record the three rent agreements i.e. agreement-1/Ex.PW1/2, agreement-2/Ex. PW1/3 and agreement- 3/Ex. PW1/4, as per which the suit property was given on rent of defendant. 11. Thus, based on the said documents, it is abundantly clear that Anil Kumar entered the suit property as a tenant and started occupying the suit property. 12. This tenancy was eventually terminated vide legal notice Ex.PW1/6 dated 29.10.2025. The last rent as proved on the record was Rs. 9500/- per month. Thus, defendant is not a protected tenant under the provisions of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958. 13. The testimony of plaintiff including the document placed on record have gone unrebutted and unimpeached. There is nothing before this Court to disbelieve the said facts/documents. The testimony of plaintiff/PW-1 is found to be cogent, consistent and credible. Defendant did not CS No. 56/26 Satish Chauhan Vs. Anil Kumar Page No. 3 of 5 -- 3 of 5 -- appear before this Court to give his version of events. Thus, considering the aforesaid facts and keeping in mind that the entire evidence of plaintiff has gone unrebutted, plaintiff is entitled to following reliefs: Reliefs: 1. Plaintiff is entitled to a decree of possession in respect of suit property i.e. property bearing No. J-30, New Seelampur, Delhi-110053 having two room set on the first floor. 2. Plaintiff is entitled to recovery of arrears of rent amounting to Rs. 2,01,500/- w.e.f 28.11.2023 calculated uptil 27.01.2026 (i.e. just before filing of the present suit). 3. Plaintiff is also entitled to recover mesne @ Rs. 9,500/- per month w.e.f. 28.01.2026 till possession is given to plaintiff 4. Cost of the suit is also awarded to plaintiff. 14. Let a decree-sheet be prepared. 15. Site plan Ex.PW1/1 to form part of decree. Announced in the open court Aashish Gupta on 08.10.2026 District Judge-01, North-East KKD Courts, Delhi CS No. 56/26 Satish Chauhan Vs. Anil Kumar Page No. 4 of 5 -- 4 of 5 -- FORM ‘A’ CIVIL CASES LIST OF WITNESSES S.No. Name of Witness Whether witness of plaintiff or defendant. 1. PW-1/Satish Chauhan Plaintiff LIST OF DOCUMENTS S.No Exhibit/Mark Date of Exhibit Description of Exhibit 1. Ex. PW1/1 07.08.2026 Site plan. 2. Ex. PW1/2 07.08.2026 Rent agreement dated 27.10.2023. 3. Ex. PW1/3 07.08.2026 Second rent agreement dated 17.09.2024. 4. Ex. PW1/4 07.08.2026 Third rent agreement dated 17.03.2025. 5. Ex. PW1/5 07.08.2026 Aadhar Card of plaintiff. 6. Ex. PW1/6 07.08.2026 Legal notice dated 29.10.2025. 7. Ex. PW1/7 07.08.2026 Postal receipt. 8. Ex. PW1/8 07.08.2026 Aadhar card of Anil Kumar CS No. 56/26 Satish Chauhan Vs. Anil Kumar Page No. 5 of 5 -- 5 of 5 --
