Order 2

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 12 Succ. Court 91/25
MANJU SARAOGI AND OTHERS Vs. STATE AND OTHERS
07.01.2026
Present: Sh. Sandeep Kumar Gupta, counsel for petitioner.
Mohd. Shahnabaz on behalf of SDM Lajpat
Nagar/Respondent no.1.
None for respondent no.2.
Sh. Rakesh Kathuria on behalf of respondent no.3.
As per reader report, publication has been affected in both the
newspapers as per order dated 25.10.2025. But no objections have been
received till date.
With respect to respondent no.2, notice issued to respondent
no.2 received back served. However, none has appeared.
Counsel for petitioner states that the particulars of respondent
no.2 have been wrongly mentioned and therefore an application under order
1 rule 10 CPC has been filed on behalf of petitioner in this regard.
Heard. Perused.
For reasons stated in the application, application under
order 1 Rule 10 CPC stands allowed and the correct particulars of
respondent no.2 are hereby taken on record.
Amended memo of parties filed.
Further, an application under order 6 rule 17 CPC has been
filed on behalf of the petitioner for rectifying the clerical mistakes.
Heard. Perused.
As only formal corrections are sought to be made and no
substitution of cause of action is sought, therefore, application stands
allowed and the amended petition is hereby taken on record.
Statement of Mohd. Shahnawaz and Sh. Rakesh Kathuria
recorded as RW-1 and RW-2 on behalf of respondent no.1 and 3 and
accordingly they stand discharged.
With respect to respondent no.2, fresh steps be taken for
service within four weeks.
In addition, at request, dasti service is also permitted.
List for report from respondent no.2 and PE on 27.03.2026.
Sh. Rupinder Singh Dhiman
ACJ/CCJ/ARC, NDD, PHC
New Delhi :07.01.2026
-- 1 of 1 --