Interim Order 5

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 10 CS SCJ 527/24
Krishan Chand Vs. Reshma Devi
11.12.2025
Present: Sh. Vinay Sharma, Counsel for plaintiff along with
plaintiff.
Counsel for plaintiff states that vide order dated
22.07.2025, plaintiff was permitted to serve the defendant through all
modes. It is stated that though the summons issued through Nazarat
branch/postal department had remained unexecuted, however, plaintiff
was also handed over dasti summons and the same have been served to
the defendant through her elder son on the mobile phone.
Submissions heard. Record perused.
Perusal of record shows that the order-sheet dated
22.07.2025 bears endorsement of the counsel for plaintiff regarding the
receipt of dasti summons. Further, the plaintiff has averred on affidavit
that the summons were sent through WhatsApp to mobile number
9068474588, and stated the same to be the admitted number of Sh.
Birjpal @ Birju, the elder son of the defendant.
Hence, court query is made tot he plaintiff regarding his
affidavit.
On query, he states that Birjpal @ Birju is the son of
defendant but he is not the elder son rather the middle son.
In these circumstances, separate statement of the plaintiff
is recorded.
In view of statement of the plaintiff on oath verifying the
service of defendant through her son, defendant stands served on
08.10.2025.
As the prescribed period has already expired and no
WS has been filed till date, therefore, the defence of the defendant
is hereby struck off.
List for PE on 12.03.2026.
Rupinder Singh Dhiman
ACJ/CCJ/ARC, NDD, PHC
New Delhi :11.12.2025
-- 1 of 1 --