Order 2

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 7 CS SCJ 559-26
MS V S ELECTRICALS AND TRADERS THROUGH ITS
SPA SH VIRENDER SIROHI Vs. JMD
INFRASTRUCTURES THROGH ITS PROPRIETOR
RAJNI SINGH AND RAMAN SINGH
19.09.2026
Present: Mr. Ashwani Kumar Mishra, Learned Counsel for
the Plaintiff with AR of Plaintiff.
D-2 in person.
Summons issued to the Defendants No. 1 and 3 received
back unserved.
Summons issued to the Defendant No. 2 received back
served on 26.05.2026.
D-2 has appeared and states that he has nothing to do with
D-1 and is not aware why he has been impleaded.
On inquiry, Learned Counsel for the Plaintiff states that D-
2 introduced the Plaintiff to D-1. D-1, in the memo of parties, is
described as a proprietorship concern “through its proprietor Rajni Singh
& Raman Singh”.
A further reading of the file would reveal that the invoices
on which Plaintiff relies are built to one JMD Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.
The suit does not appear to be maintainable as filed.
On being asked to address the same, Learned Counsel for
the Plaintiff seeks an adjournment to assist the court as the AR of
Plaintiff, present in court, is unable to answer the questions.
The proprietor of Plaintiff is directed to remain personally
present on the next date of hearing for examination.
At request, list on 21.11.2026.
(VAIBHAV PRATAP SINGH)
Civil Judge, Patiala House Courts
New Delhi District, Delhi
19.09.2026
-- 1 of 1 --