Order 2

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: -1-
CC NI ACT 11317-2022
SALEEM Vs. RAVINDER PANWAR
20.12.2022
(Proceedings conducted through Video conferencing on Cisco Webex platform using
the URL link https://delhidistrictcourts.webex.com/meet/ninewdelhi3.
Present: Sh. Debmalya Ganguli, Ld. counsel for the complainant.
Ld. counsel for the complainant has filed application for condonation of delay
on the e-mail ID of the court. Same be taken on record.
It is stated that one day delay in filing the complaint has been caused as the
counsel did not have login credentials of e-filing portal for the e-filing of the present
complaint and he had to take assistance of a local counsel in this regard.
Application perused.
In the opinion of court, the delay of one day for the reasons mentioned above
deserves to be condoned. Hence, the application is disposed off as allowed.
Ahlmad of the Court intimates that he has received the original case
documents from the complainant. He is directed to keep the same in his safe custody.
COGNIZANCE AND SUMMONING ORDER
(1) This is a complaint filed for offence punishable under Section 138 N. I. Act.
Complaint, affidavit of evidence and other annexed documents perused. I take cognizance
of the said offence.
(2) The Hon’ble Supreme Court in A. C. Narayanan Vs. State of Maharashtra
& Anr.” (2014) 11 SCC 790, has given discretion to the Magistrate to rely on the
complaint, documents annexed and the affidavit submitted by complainant in deciding
whether or not to issue process. u/s. 200 CrPC and it is not mandatory to examine upon oath
the complainant or its witnesses in order to decide the same. Upon considering the instant
complaint, documents produced and verification in the form of affidavit of evidence, there
are sufficient grounds for proceeding further against accused for offence punishable under
Section 138 N. I. Act. Accused is prima facie responsible, being the drawer of the cheque in
dispute.
(3) In terms of inquiry conducted under Section 202 CrPC, all the statutory requirements
have been complied with. The complaint is filed within the period of
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
limitation. I am also prima facie satisfied that the offence has been committed within the
jurisdiction of this court.
Hence, issue summons against the accused on PF/RC/Approved Courier.
Service be also effected on the email and whatsApp message(s), as provided by the
complainant and further subject to filing of report of service. Necessary particulars be filed
on affidavit within 7 days. For facilitation of the same, dasti summons are permitted. The
process server is directed to serve the summons by way of affixation in terms of Sec. 65
CrPC, if premises found closed or same could not be served personally or on any adult male
member.
(4) As per the guidelines laid down in Damodar S. Prabhu Vs. Sayed Babalal
H, AIR 2010 (SC) 1907, Ahlmad is directed to make a mention on the summons issued
against the accused (by adding separate sheet, if required) that “accused can make an
application for compounding of the offence at the first and second hearing of the case and if
such an application is made, compounding may be allowed by the Court without imposing
any costs on the accused.”
(5) Ahlmad is also directed to mention the official email id and video
conferencing link of this Court on the summons. Complainant is directed to file PF and take
steps within 07 days including providing copy(ies) of complaint otherwise the complaint
may be dismissed u/s 204(4) Cr. P.C. The complainant is also apprised of the fact that at the
time of filing 1 st PF, he is required to mandatorily fill the Meta Deta form.
Put up for report/appearance of accused on 13.04.2023.
PA is directed to do updation of the case and upload the order as per rules.
(PADMA LANDOL)
MM (NI Act) Digital Court-03
New Delhi, PHC/Delhi/20.12.2022
-- 2 of 2 --