Interim Order 1

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 1CC NI ACT/81512/2026 OXYZO FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD Vs VISHAL JAYSAWAL
2CC NI ACT/81513/2026 OXYZO FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD Vs GURMEET KAUR
3CC NI ACT/81515/2026 OXYZO FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD Vs VISHVENDRA KHILERY
5CC NI ACT/81518/2026 Om Prakash Arora Vs Megrez Foods and Beverages Pvt Ltd
6CC NI ACT/81519/2026 MOREPEN RX LIMITED Vs KHUSHI PHARMA 269232
7CC NI ACT/81521/2026 MOREPEN RX LIMITED Vs KHAN MEDICAL AGENCY 000944
8CC NI ACT/81524/2026 MOREPEN RX LIMITED Vs RAJ PHARMACEUTICALS 003340 And 003347
9CC NI ACT/81525/2026 M/s Saffire Crop Science Private Limited Vs CHANDRESH SINGH BERU
10CC NI ACT/81526/2026 MOREPEN RX LIMITED Vs NILKANTH ENTERPRISES 247143
12CC NI ACT/81532/2026 NECTAR INFOSYSTEMS INDIA PVT LTD Vs WADHWA HOUSE
16CC NI ACT/81538/2026 ART HOUSING FINANCE INDIA LIMITED Vs RAJNI ARORA
19CC NI ACT/81544/2026 STERLING FINANCE AND LEASING CO Vs NAMITA CHOPRA
21CC NI ACT/81547/2026 ART HOUSING FINANCE INDIA LIMITED Vs RUPA KUNWAR
23CC NI ACT/81550/2026 ATUL TYAGI Vs AMIT KUMAR
26CC NI ACT/81558/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs AJAYA BAGH
27CC NI ACT/81563/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs ALAMGIR ANSARI
28CC NI ACT/81579/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs DAULATRAM YADAV
29CC NI ACT/81581/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs GOLU GIRWAL
30CC NI ACT/81583/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs PREETI
31CC NI ACT/81585/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs MAHABUB MIYAN
32CC NI ACT/81587/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs MAMATA DEVI
33CC NI ACT/81591/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs SARITA RAVI KUMAR
34CC NI ACT/81597/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs CHINTADA SUDHA
35CC NI ACT/81598/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs NIRAJ
36CC NI ACT/81600/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs RABUL HUSSAIN LASKAR
37CC NI ACT/81610/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs HIMANSHU SINGH
38CC NI ACT/81614/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs RABINDRA HAZARA
39CC NI ACT/81617/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs RABI GHOSH
40CC NI ACT/81618/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs PUSHPA KUMARI
41CC NI ACT/81619/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs PURNACHANDRA NAIK
42CC NI ACT/81620/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs MALTI
43CC NI ACT/81621/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs PUJA KUMARI
44CC NI ACT/81622/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs NINGARAJA K
45CC NI ACT/81623/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs MAROOF KHAN
46CC NI ACT/81625/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs PUJA KUMARI
47CC NI ACT/81637/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs DIPAK KUMAR DHIRAJ
48CC NI ACT/81639/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs NILAM DEVI
49CC NI ACT/81642/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs DINKAR SAHNI
50CC NI ACT/81644/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs DIPA DAS
51CC NI ACT/81645/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs DEEPAK KASHYAP
52CC NI ACT/81647/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs HASINA KATUN
53CC NI ACT/81649/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs NARAYAN SOREN
54CC NI ACT/81650/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs NIKHIL CHOUHAN
55CC NI ACT/81652/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs MEENA
56CC NI ACT/81653/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs PRIYANKA CHATTERJEE
57CC NI ACT/81656/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs BADAM YADAV
58CC NI ACT/81659/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs NIBHASH KUMAR
59CC NI ACT/81664/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs PRIYA MALAKAR
60CC NI ACT/81668/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs GAURAV SINGH PANWAR
22.09.2026
(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex)
Fresh case received. It be checked and registered.
Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 39000+ caes.
Parcha.
Present: None.
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
Physical file has not yet been filed by the complainant.
No original documents are shown which are necessary for the purpose of summoning, to ascertain
that complainant is the holder of the cheque/mandate, to ascertain that e-filed documents are the genuine
one and not the forged/self made and to avoid the duplicacy of the proceedings.
Put up for consideration on 21.12.2028
(Snehil Sharma)
Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
PHC/New Delhi/22.09.2026
-- 1 of 14 --
4CC NI ACT/81516/2026 Kimbal Private Limited Vs SAV Engineers Private Limited
22.09.2026
(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex)
Fresh case received. It be checked and registered.
Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 39000+ caes.
Present: Sh. Meeran Maqbool, ld. counsel for the complainant.
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
In view of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India titled as Sanjabij Tari Vs.
Kishore S Borcar, the notice u/s 223 BNSS need not be issued to proposed accused
before taking the cognizance.
1. Arguments on behalf of the complainant heard on point of cognizance as well as
summoning.
2. Present complaint is filed alleging that accused had issued the cheque(s) bearing No. 000983
of HDFC Bank to the complainant to discharge his/ her legal liability which got dishonored.
Thereafter, complainant sent a legal demand notice and despite service of the same, accused failed to
make the payment and thereby complainant prays to take cognizance U/Sec.142 of Negotiable
Instruments Act, 1881 for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881/25
PASSA Act 2007.
3. After considering the present complaint, attached documents and the evidence of complainant
by way of affidavit which is considered qua the requirement of section 202 of Cr.PC, I am of the view
that Prima facie case is made out for the offence U/Sec. 138 of NI Act,1881/25 PASSA Act 2007
therefore, I take the cognizance in the present case for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of NI
Act,1881/ 25 PASSA Act 2007.This court is of further opinion that
prima facie there is sufficient
material to proceed against the accused.
4 Dasti summons be issued against the accused SAV Engineers Private Limited,
Mahipal and Gagandeep (signatory to the cheque and DIrector) on filing of PF within 30 days for
NDOH for the purpose of speed post/self delivery to the accused.
Let summons be issued through all e modes/digital mode also on filing of email ID,
whatsapp number, messaging application of the accused on affidavit alongwith PF and verification of
the said particulars.
Complainant is directed to file Tracking Report on NDOH.
Complainant is also given an opportunity to file fresh address of accused alongwith
affidavit of physical verification alongwith Google location of verification and photographs of the
house.
Time to follow strictly.
Matter be put up for appearance of accused/furnishing of Bail Bond on 29.03.2027.
(Snehil Sharma)
Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
PHC/New Delhi/22.09.2026
-- 2 of 14 --
11CC NI ACT/81528/2026 MD RAHUL Vs VARUN KUMAR
22.09.2026
(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex)
Fresh case received. It be checked and registered.
Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 39000+ caes.
Present: Sh. Vikesh Kumar and Sh. Latika Goel, ld. counsel for the complainant.
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
In view of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India titled as Sanjabij
Tari Vs. Kishore S Borcar, the notice u/s 223 BNSS need not be issued to proposed accused
before taking the cognizance.
1. Arguments on behalf of the complainant heard on point of cognizance as well as
summoning.
2. Present complaint is filed alleging that accused had issued the cheque(s) bearing No.
000013 of Indian Oversees Bank to the complainant to discharge his/ her legal liability which
got dishonored. Thereafter, complainant sent a legal demand notice and despite service of the
same, accused failed to make the payment and thereby complainant prays to take cognizance
U/Sec.142 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881/25 PASSA Act 2007.
3. After considering the present complaint, attached documents and the evidence of
complainant by way of affidavit which is considered qua the requirement of section 202 of
Cr.PC, I am of the view that Prima facie case is made out for the offence U/Sec. 138 of NI
Act,1881/25 PASSA Act 2007 therefore, I take the cognizance in the present case for the
offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of NI Act,1881/ 25 PASSA Act 2007.This court is of further
opinion that
prima facie there is sufficient material to proceed against the accused.
4 Dasti summons be issued against the accused Varun Kumar (signatory to the
cheque) on filing of PF within 30 days for NDOH for the purpose of speed post/self delivery
to the accused.
Let summons be issued through all e modes/digital mode also on filing of email
ID, whatsapp number, messaging application of the accused on affidavit alongwith PF and
verification of the said particulars.
Complainant is directed to file Tracking Report on NDOH.
Complainant is also given an opportunity to file fresh address of accused
alongwith affidavit of physical verification alongwith Google location of verification and
photographs of the house.
Time to follow strictly.
Matter be put up for appearance of accused/furnishing of Bail Bond on 14.07.2027
(Snehil Sharma)
Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
PHC/New Delhi/22.09.2026
-- 3 of 14 --
14CC NI ACT/81536/2026 Noor Ahmad Tyagi Vs Nikita Chauhan
22.09.2026
(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex)
Fresh case received. It be checked and registered.
Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 39000+ caes.
Present: Complainant in person.
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
In view of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India titled as Sanjabij
Tari Vs. Kishore S Borcar, the notice u/s 223 BNSS need not be issued to proposed accused
before taking the cognizance.
1. Arguments on behalf of the complainant heard on point of cognizance as well as
summoning.
2. Present complaint is filed alleging that accused had issued the cheque(s) bearing No.
349584 of SBI Bank to the complainant to discharge his/ her legal liability which got
dishonored. Thereafter, complainant sent a legal demand notice and despite service of the
same, accused failed to make the payment and thereby complainant prays to take cognizance
U/Sec.142 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881/25 PASSA Act 2007.
3. After considering the present complaint, attached documents and the evidence of
complainant by way of affidavit which is considered qua the requirement of section 202 of
Cr.PC, I am of the view that Prima facie case is made out for the offence U/Sec. 138 of NI
Act,1881/25 PASSA Act 2007 therefore, I take the cognizance in the present case for the
offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of NI Act,1881/ 25 PASSA Act 2007.This court is of further
opinion that
prima facie there is sufficient material to proceed against the accused.
4 Dasti summons be issued against the accused Nikita Chauhan (signatory to the
cheque) on filing of PF within 30 days for NDOH for the purpose of speed post/self delivery
to the accused.
Let summons be issued through all e modes/digital mode also on filing of email
ID, whatsapp number, messaging application of the accused on affidavit alongwith PF and
verification of the said particulars.
Complainant is directed to file Tracking Report on NDOH.
Complainant is also given an opportunity to file fresh address of accused
alongwith affidavit of physical verification alongwith Google location of verification and
photographs of the house.
Time to follow strictly.
Matter be put up for appearance of accused/furnishing of Bail Bond on 29.03.2027.
(Snehil Sharma)
Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
PHC/New Delhi/22.09.2026
-- 4 of 14 --
15CC NI ACT/81537/2026 PRAKASH KUMAR SRIVASTAVA Vs K S PROPMART PRIVATE
LIMITED
22.09.2026
(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex)
Fresh case received. It be checked and registered.
Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 39000+ cases.
Present: Sh. Vinod Kumar Singh, ld. counsel for the complainant.
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
Adjournment sought. Allowed.
Put up for consideration on 21.12.2028.
(Snehil Sharma)
Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
PHC/New Delhi/22.09.2026
-- 5 of 14 --
17CC NI ACT/81539/2026 SURYA ROSHNI LIMITED Vs UJJA WAL
ELECTRIC
22.09.2026
(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex)
Fresh case received. It be checked and registered.
Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 39000+ caes.
Present: Sh. Vatsal Dhar, ld. counsel for the complainant.
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
Perusal of record shows that as the complaint is filed after the 1st of
July 2024, therefore provisions of BNSS apply in this case. Clarification sought
with respect to delivery of legal notice.
Complainant is also given an opportunity to file last known address
of accused alongwith affidavit of physical verification alongwith Google
location of verification and photographs of the house.
Put up for consideration on 29.03.2027.
(Snehil Sharma)
Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
PHC/New Delhi/22.09.2026
-- 6 of 14 --
18CC NI ACT/81541/2026 Noor Ahmed Tyagi Vs NIKITA CHAUHAN
22.09.2026
(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex)
Fresh case received. It be checked and registered.
Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 39000+ caes.
Present: Complainant in person.
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
In view of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India titled as Sanjabij
Tari Vs. Kishore S Borcar, the notice u/s 223 BNSS need not be issued to proposed accused
before taking the cognizance.
1. Arguments on behalf of the complainant heard on point of cognizance as well as
summoning.
2. Present complaint is filed alleging that accused had issued the cheque(s) bearing No.
349576 of SBI Bank to the complainant to discharge his/ her legal liability which got
dishonored. Thereafter, complainant sent a legal demand notice and despite service of the
same, accused failed to make the payment and thereby complainant prays to take cognizance
U/Sec.142 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881/25 PASSA Act 2007.
3. After considering the present complaint, attached documents and the evidence of
complainant by way of affidavit which is considered qua the requirement of section 202 of
Cr.PC, I am of the view that Prima facie case is made out for the offence U/Sec. 138 of NI
Act,1881/25 PASSA Act 2007 therefore, I take the cognizance in the present case for the
offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of NI Act,1881/ 25 PASSA Act 2007.This court is of further
opinion that
prima facie there is sufficient material to proceed against the accused.
4 Dasti summons be issued against the accused Nikita Chauhan (signatory to the
cheque) on filing of PF within 30 days for NDOH for the purpose of speed post/self delivery
to the accused.
Let summons be issued through all e modes/digital mode also on filing of email
ID, whatsapp number, messaging application of the accused on affidavit alongwith PF and
verification of the said particulars.
Complainant is directed to file Tracking Report on NDOH.
Complainant is also given an opportunity to file fresh address of accused
alongwith affidavit of physical verification alongwith Google location of verification and
photographs of the house.
Time to follow strictly.
Matter be put up for appearance of accused/furnishing of Bail Bond on 29.03.2027.
(Snehil Sharma)
Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
PHC/New Delhi/22.09.2026
-- 7 of 14 --
20CC NI ACT/81546/2026 SURYA ROSHNI LIMITED Vs RP ENTERPRISES
22.09.2026
(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex)
Fresh case received. It be checked and registered.
Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 39000+ caes.
Present: Sh. Vatsal, ld. counsel for the complainant.
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
In view of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India titled as Sanjabij Tari Vs.
Kishore S Borcar, the notice u/s 223 BNSS need not be issued to proposed accused
before taking the cognizance.
1. Arguments on behalf of the complainant heard on point of cognizance as well as
summoning.
2. Present complaint is filed alleging that accused had issued the cheque(s) bearing No. 283252
of Axis Bank to the complainant to discharge his/ her legal liability which got dishonored. Thereafter,
complainant sent a legal demand notice and despite service of the same, accused failed to make the
payment and thereby complainant prays to take cognizance U/Sec.142 of Negotiable Instruments Act,
1881 for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881/25 PASSA Act 2007.
3. After considering the present complaint, attached documents and the evidence of complainant
by way of affidavit which is considered qua the requirement of section 202 of Cr.PC, I am of the view
that Prima facie case is made out for the offence U/Sec. 138 of NI Act,1881/25 PASSA Act 2007
therefore, I take the cognizance in the present case for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of NI
Act,1881/ 25 PASSA Act 2007.This court is of further opinion that
prima facie there is sufficient
material to proceed against the accused.
4 Dasti summons be issued against the accused RP Enterprieses prop. Suchitra Hota
(signatory to the cheque and DIrector) on filing of PF within 30 days for NDOH for the purpose of
speed post/self delivery to the accused.
Let summons be issued through all e modes/digital mode also on filing of email ID,
whatsapp number, messaging application of the accused on affidavit alongwith PF and verification of
the said particulars.
Complainant is directed to file Tracking Report on NDOH.
Complainant is also given an opportunity to file fresh address of accused alongwith
affidavit of physical verification alongwith Google location of verification and photographs of the
house.
Time to follow strictly.
Matter be put up for appearance of accused/furnishing of Bail Bond on 29.03.2027.
(Snehil Sharma)
Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
PHC/New Delhi/22.09.2026
-- 8 of 14 --
22CC NI ACT/81549/2026 SURYA ROSHNI LIMITED Vs MIRA TRADING
22.09.2026
(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex)
Fresh case received. It be checked and registered.
Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 39000+ caes.
Present: Sh. Vatsal, ld. counsel for the complainant.
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
In view of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India titled as Sanjabij Tari Vs.
Kishore S Borcar, the notice u/s 223 BNSS need not be issued to proposed accused
before taking the cognizance.
1. Arguments on behalf of the complainant heard on point of cognizance as well as
summoning.
2. Present complaint is filed alleging that accused had issued the cheque(s) bearing No. 000464
of Axis Bank to the complainant to discharge his/ her legal liability which got dishonored. Thereafter,
complainant sent a legal demand notice and despite service of the same, accused failed to make the
payment and thereby complainant prays to take cognizance U/Sec.142 of Negotiable Instruments Act,
1881 for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881/25 PASSA Act 2007.
3. After considering the present complaint, attached documents and the evidence of complainant
by way of affidavit which is considered qua the requirement of section 202 of Cr.PC, I am of the view
that Prima facie case is made out for the offence U/Sec. 138 of NI Act,1881/25 PASSA Act 2007
therefore, I take the cognizance in the present case for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of NI
Act,1881/ 25 PASSA Act 2007.This court is of further opinion that
prima facie there is sufficient
material to proceed against the accused.
4 Dasti summons be issued against the accused Mira Trading prop. Mira (signatory to
the cheque and DIrector) on filing of PF within 30 days for NDOH for the purpose of speed post/self
delivery to the accused.
Let summons be issued through all e modes/digital mode also on filing of email ID,
whatsapp number, messaging application of the accused on affidavit alongwith PF and verification of
the said particulars.
Complainant is directed to file Tracking Report on NDOH.
Complainant is also given an opportunity to file fresh address of accused alongwith
affidavit of physical verification alongwith Google location of verification and photographs of the
house.
Time to follow strictly.
Matter be put up for appearance of accused/furnishing of Bail Bond on 29.03.2027.
(Snehil Sharma)
Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
PHC/New Delhi/22.09.2026
-- 9 of 14 --
24CC NI ACT/81553/2026 JONATHAN SETH Vs RAHIL JOSEPH
22.09.2026
(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex)
Fresh case received. It be checked and registered.
Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 39000+ caes.
Present: ld. counsel for the complainant.
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
Perusal of record shows that as the complaint is filed after the 1st of
July 2024, therefore provisions of BNSS apply in this case. Clarification sought
with respect to delivery of legal notice.
It is also found that to justify the address mentioned on legal notice,
there is some pen correction on the Aadhar Card of the propsed accused.
Undersigned is not satified the way the case is being is filed with pen correction
just to justify that they had sent the legal notice.
Complainant is also given an opportunity to file any other address
of accused alongwith affidavit of physical verification alongwith Google
location of verification and photographs of the house to show that accused reside
at the address mentioned on legal notice and not the address mentioned on
aadhar card.
Put up for consideration on 14.07.2027.
(Snehil Sharma)
Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
PHC/New Delhi/22.09.2026
-- 10 of 14 --
25CC NI ACT/81556/2026 Manish Bindal Vs Padam Chawla
22.09.2026 (Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex)
Fresh case received. It be checked and registered.
Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 39000+ caes.
Present: Ms. Muskan Rawlley, ld. counsel for the complainant.
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
E filing history is not filed.
Affidavit qua the e filing is filed. As per which the matter was filed on 07.09.2026 and
is within the limitation.
In view of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India titled as Sanjabij Tari Vs.
Kishore S Borcar, the notice u/s 223 BNSS need not be issued to proposed accused
before taking the cognizance.
1. Arguments on behalf of the complainant heard on point of cognizance as well as
summoning.
2. Present complaint is filed alleging that accused had issued the cheque(s) bearing No. 000240
of DCB Bank to the complainant to discharge his/ her legal liability which got dishonored. Thereafter,
complainant sent a legal demand notice and despite service of the same, accused failed to make the
payment and thereby complainant prays to take cognizance U/Sec.142 of Negotiable Instruments Act,
1881 for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881/25 PASSA Act 2007.
3. After considering the present complaint, attached documents and the evidence of complainant
by way of affidavit which is considered qua the requirement of section 202 of Cr.PC, I am of the view
that Prima facie case is made out for the offence U/Sec. 138 of NI Act,1881/25 PASSA Act 2007
therefore, I take the cognizance in the present case for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of NI
Act,1881/ 25 PASSA Act 2007.This court is of further opinion that
prima facie there is sufficient
material to proceed against the accused.
4 Dasti summons be issued against the accused Padma Chawla (signatory to the
cheque) on filing of PF within 30 days for NDOH for the purpose of speed post/self delivery to the
accused.
Let summons be issued through all e modes/digital mode also on filing of email ID,
whatsapp number, messaging application of the accused on affidavit alongwith PF and verification of
the said particulars.
Complainant is directed to file Tracking Report on NDOH.
Complainant is also given an opportunity to file fresh address of accused alongwith
affidavit of physical verification alongwith Google location of verification and photographs of the
house.
Time to follow strictly.
Matter be put up for appearance of accused/furnishing of Bail Bond on 29.03.2027
(Snehil Sharma)
Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
PHC/New Delhi/22.09.2026
-- 11 of 14 --
61CC NI ACT/81671/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs MANOJ KUMAR YADAV
62CC NI ACT/81674/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs MALLAPPA MADAR
63CC NI ACT/81679/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs PRITI KUMARI
64CC NI ACT/81685/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs PRITAM PAUL
65CC NI ACT/81687/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs NEPAL SINGH YADAV
66CC NI ACT/81689/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs Manohar Ray
67CC NI ACT/81692/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs MANOJ KUMAR
68CC NI ACT/81694/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs MANMOHAN
69CC NI ACT/81697/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs HEMVATI
70CC NI ACT/81699/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs CHAINA BIBI
22.09.2026
(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex)
Fresh case received. It be checked and registered.
Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 39000+ caes.
Parcha.
Present: None.
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
Physical file has not yet been filed by the complainant.
No original documents are shown which are necessary for the purpose of summoning, to ascertain
that complainant is the holder of the cheque/mandate, to ascertain that e-filed documents are the genuine
one and not the forged/self made and to avoid the duplicacy of the proceedings.
Put up for consideration on 21.12.2028.
(Snehil Sharma)
Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
PHC/New Delhi/22.09.2026
-- 12 of 14 --
71CC NI ACT/81701/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs OMENDRA SINGH
72CC NI ACT/81703/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs MEENESH
73CC NI ACT/81707/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs JOSEF MURMU
74CC NI ACT/81710/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs ADIL MOHAMMAD
75CC NI ACT/81712/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs NAVEEN ARYA
76CC NI ACT/81716/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs KAMAR JAHAN
77CC NI ACT/81719/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs PREMASINGH
78CC NI ACT/81721/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs GULLE
79CC NI ACT/81724/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs KHUSHBU KUMARI
80CC NI ACT/81729/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs GITA DEVI
81CC NI ACT/81730/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs Neeraj Kumar Maurya
82CC NI ACT/81733/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs MD REZANUR
83CC NI ACT/81734/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs KASINATHAN KATHALINGAM
84CC NI ACT/81736/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs GOPALAKRISHNAPPA
85CC NI ACT/81737/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs LAL BABU SONKAR
86CC NI ACT/81742/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs KAMAL MALAVIY
87CC NI ACT/81743/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs PREM SINGH
88CC NI ACT/81744/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs CHANDA KHATOON
89CC NI ACT/81745/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs CHANDAN KUMAR
90CC NI ACT/81746/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs RADHA KUMARI
91CC NI ACT/81747/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs DEVRAJ LALBAHDUR PASWAN
92CC NI ACT/81749/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs RABITA KUMARI
93CC NI ACT/81750/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs R N PRIYANKA
94CC NI ACT/81753/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs Sachin Singh
95CC NI ACT/81755/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs PUSHPA DEVI
96CC NI ACT/81757/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs MO TAKDEESH
97CC NI ACT/81759/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs MADHUP KUMAR
98CC NI ACT/81761/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs Karan Katheriya
99CC NI ACT/81763/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs AKHILESH KUMAR
100CC NI ACT/81765/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs MANGAL SINH GARAWAL
101CC NI ACT/81767/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs DINESH KUMAR
102CC NI ACT/81769/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs DEVAPPA POTARAJ
103CC NI ACT/81771/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs CHINTA RAM TIWARI
104CC NI ACT/81773/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs JAY CHANDRA
105CC NI ACT/81775/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs PRIYANKA KUMARI
106CC NI ACT/81776/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs GULAB CHANDRA
107CC NI ACT/81777/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs Abhishek Kumar Soni
108CC NI ACT/81779/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs MANISHA
109CC NI ACT/81782/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs PREM SINGH
110CC NI ACT/81784/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs DHARA SINGH
111CC NI ACT/81786/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs PASUNUTI VANI
112CC NI ACT/81788/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs MANOJ LOVANSHI
113CC NI ACT/81790/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs KALPESHBHAI NANDLAL VALAND
114CC NI ACT/81792/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs Basir Ansari
115CC NI ACT/81794/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs NEERAJ TYAGI
116CC NI ACT/81796/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs PRITAM MANDAL
117CC NI ACT/81798/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs CHANDAN KUMAR
118CC NI ACT/81800/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs dhanesh kumar
119CC NI ACT/81802/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs PREMVEER
120CC NI ACT/81804/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs MANISH RAJAVIR
121CC NI ACT/81806/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs JITENDR KUMAR SHINGH
122CC NI ACT/81808/2026 Hero Fincorp Ltd Vs JITENDRA
22.09.2026
(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex)
Fresh case received. It be checked and registered.
Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 39000+ caes.
Parcha.
Present: None.
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
Physical file has not yet been filed by the complainant.
No original documents are shown which are necessary for the purpose of summoning, to ascertain
that complainant is the holder of the cheque/mandate, to ascertain that e-filed documents are the genuine
one and not the forged/self made and to avoid the duplicacy of the proceedings.
Put up for consideration on 22.12.2028
(Snehil Sharma)
Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
PHC/New Delhi/22.09.2026
-- 13 of 14 --
13CC NI ACT/81534/2026 NAN PAO RESINS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED Vs ZARA ENTERPRISES THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR MS
SHAHZADI PARVEEN
22.09.2026 (Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex)
Fresh case received. It be checked and registered.
Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 39000+ caes.
Present: Ms. Yogita Rathore and Ms. Ananya Roshyan , ld. counsel for the complainant.
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
E filing history is not filed.
Affidavit qua the e filing is filed. As per which the matter was filed on 07.09.2026 and
is within the limitation.
In view of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India titled as Sanjabij Tari Vs.
Kishore S Borcar, the notice u/s 223 BNSS need not be issued to proposed accused
before taking the cognizance.
1. Arguments on behalf of the complainant heard on point of cognizance as well as
summoning.
2. Present complaint is filed alleging that accused had issued the cheque(s) bearing No. 000011,
000012, 000013 of DCB Bank to the complainant to discharge his/ her legal liability which got
dishonored. Thereafter, complainant sent a legal demand notice and despite service of the same,
accused failed to make the payment and thereby complainant prays to take cognizance U/Sec.142 of
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of Negotiable Instruments
Act, 1881/25 PASSA Act 2007.
3. After considering the present complaint, attached documents and the evidence of complainant
by way of affidavit which is considered qua the requirement of section 202 of Cr.PC, I am of the view
that Prima facie case is made out for the offence U/Sec. 138 of NI Act,1881/25 PASSA Act 2007
therefore, I take the cognizance in the present case for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of NI
Act,1881/ 25 PASSA Act 2007.This court is of further opinion that
prima facie there is sufficient
material to proceed against the accused.
4 Dasti summons be issued against the accused ZARA ENTERPRISES THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR
MS SHAHZADI PARVEEN (signatory to the cheque) on filing of PF within 30 days for NDOH for the
purpose of speed post/self delivery to the accused.
Let summons be issued through all e modes/digital mode also on filing of email ID,
whatsapp number, messaging application of the accused on affidavit alongwith PF and verification of
the said particulars.
Complainant is directed to file Tracking Report on NDOH.
Complainant is also given an opportunity to file fresh address of accused alongwith
affidavit of physical verification alongwith Google location of verification and photographs of the
house.
Time to follow strictly.
Matter be put up for appearance of accused/furnishing of Bail Bond on 29.03.2027.
(Snehil Sharma)
Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
PHC/New Delhi/22.09.2026
-- 14 of 14 --