Full Order Text
Order 1 · 18 Aug 2026 · CNR DLND020856962026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 1 CC NI ACT/72562/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs Sunny 2 CC NI ACT/72564/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs Deva Ram 3 CC NI ACT/72567/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs Rinku 4 CC NI ACT/72568/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs Nilam 5 CC NI ACT/72570/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs RITIK 6 CC NI ACT/72572/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs Reshmi Devi 7 CC NI ACT/72576/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs SHARMILA KUMARI SAGIYA 8 CC NI ACT/72579/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs SANJIT BARMAN 9 CC NI ACT/72580/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs Sarita Chelak 10 CC NI ACT/72581/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs REETA 11 CC NI ACT/72582/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs Hariom 12 CC NI ACT/72583/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs SHILPA T M 13 CC NI ACT/72584/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs Lokesh Kumar 14 CC NI ACT/72585/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs Babalu Kumar 15 CC NI ACT/72586/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs BABU KHAN 16 CC NI ACT/72587/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs Harkesh Sharma 17 CC NI ACT/72588/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs Sumitra Bai 18 CC NI ACT/72589/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs Dinesh Kinkar 19 CC NI ACT/72590/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs Km Neeta 20 CC NI ACT/72591/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs Saroj Bala 21 CC NI ACT/72592/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs BHAKHAR RAM 22 CC NI ACT/72593/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs ARUN KUMAR 23 CC NI ACT/72594/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs HARIVILAS 24 CC NI ACT/72595/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs Chanda Devi 25 CC NI ACT/72596/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs MAHENDRA SINGH MAKWANA 26 CC NI ACT/72597/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs Anil Kumar 27 CC NI ACT/72598/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs Rabiya 28 CC NI ACT/72599/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs POONAM 29 CC NI ACT/72600/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs KAMALESH Sharma 30 CC NI ACT/72601/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs Satendra 18.08.2026 (Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex) Fresh case received. It be checked and registered. Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 35000+ cases. Parcha. Present: None. Matter is at the stage of consideration. Physical file has not yet been filed by the complainant. No original documents are shown which are necessary for the purpose of summoning, to ascertain that complainant is the holder of the cheque/mandate, to ascertain that e-filed documents are the genuine one and not the forged/self made and to avoid the duplicacy of the proceedings. Put up for consideration on 28.09.2028. (Snehil Sharma) Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01 PHC/New Delhi/18.08.2026 -- 1 of 12 -- 31 CC NI ACT/72602/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs RAM KEVAL 32 CC NI ACT/72603/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs Karthik 33 CC NI ACT/72604/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs Simon Nand 34 CC NI ACT/72605/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs Smrita Kumari 35 CC NI ACT/72606/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs Pradeep Kumar Modanwal 36 CC NI ACT/72607/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs KEMPAMMA S 37 CC NI ACT/72608/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs Priya 38 CC NI ACT/72609/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs Rohit Kumar Atal 39 CC NI ACT/72610/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs Harindar Kumar 40 CC NI ACT/72611/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs AJAY SAH 41 CC NI ACT/72612/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs MOHD GULFAN 42 CC NI ACT/72613/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs LAKHAN 43 CC NI ACT/72614/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs MOHD WASEEM 44 CC NI ACT/72615/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs KALIBAI Mehada 45 CC NI ACT/72616/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs AJAY KUMAR 46 CC NI ACT/72617/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs VEERPAL SINGH 47 CC NI ACT/72618/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs Kajal Kumari 48 CC NI ACT/72619/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs Rajnesh Kumar 49 CC NI ACT/72620/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs RITU MEHTA 50 CC NI ACT/72621/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs Ram Sevak 51 CC NI ACT/72622/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs NITESH 52 CC NI ACT/72623/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs Sahin Khatun 53 CC NI ACT/72624/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs Anvar Ali 54 CC NI ACT/72625/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs BITTU 55 CC NI ACT/72626/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs Furkan 56 CC NI ACT/72627/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs Shobharam 57 CC NI ACT/72628/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs Mangilal 58 CC NI ACT/72629/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs Seema Parveen 59 CC NI ACT/72630/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs Akash Kumar 60 CC NI ACT/72631/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs ARIF 61 CC NI ACT/72632/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs Wasid 62 CC NI ACT/72633/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs Rajneesh Kumar Kol 63 CC NI ACT/72634/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs Anuj Kumar 64 CC NI ACT/72635/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs Ambika 65 CC NI ACT/72636/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs SOMESHWAR 66 CC NI ACT/72637/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs Mohd Rehanshah 18.08.2026(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex) Fresh case received. It be checked and registered. Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 35000+ cases. Parcha. Present: None. Matter is at the stage of consideration. Physical file has not yet been filed by the complainant. No original documents are shown which are necessary for the purpose of summoning, to ascertain that complainant is the holder of the cheque/mandate, to ascertain that e-filed documents are the genuine one and not the forged/self made and to avoid the duplicacy of the proceedings. Put up for consideration on 28.09.2028. (Snehil Sharma) Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01 PHC/New Delhi/18.08.2026 -- 2 of 12 -- 70 CC NI ACT/72641/2026 MS RELIANCE BROADCAST NETWORK LIMITED Vs PRAGATHI ADVERTISERS 18.08.2026(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex) Fresh case received. It be checked and registered. Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 35000+ cases. Present: Ms. Nandini, ld. counsel for the complainant. Matter is at the stage of consideration. In view of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India titled as Sanjabij Tari Vs. Kishore S Borcar, the notice u/s 223 BNSS need not be issued to proposed accused before taking the cognizance. 1. Arguments on behalf of the complainant heard on point of cognizance as well as summoning. 2. Present complaint is filed alleging that accused had issued the cheque(s) bearing No. 047283 of Janatha Sewa Co-op Bank to the complainant to discharge his/ her legal liability which got dishonored. Thereafter, complainant sent a legal demand notice and despite service of the same, accused failed to make the payment and thereby complainant prays to take cognizance U/Sec.142 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881/25 PASSA Act 2007. 3. After considering the present complaint, attached documents and the evidence of complainant by way of affidavit which is considered qua the requirement of section 202 of Cr.PC, I am of the view that Prima facie case is made out for the offence U/Sec. 138 of NI Act,1881/25 PASSA Act 2007 therefore, I take the cognizance in the present case for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of NI Act,1881/ 25 PASSA Act 2007.This court is of further opinion that prima facie there is sufficient material to proceed against the accused. 4 Dasti summons be issued against the accused H.N. Yogesh prop. Of Pragathi advertisers (signatory to the cheque) on filing of PF within 30 days for NDOH for the purpose of speed post/self delivery to the accused. Let summons be issued through all e modes/digital mode also on filing of email ID, whatsapp number, messaging application of the accused on affidavit alongwith PF and verification of the said particulars. Complainant is directed to file Tracking Report on NDOH. Complainant is also given an opportunity to file fresh address of accused alongwith affidavit of physical verification alongwith Google location of verification and photographs of the house. Time to follow strictly. Matter be put up for appearance of accused/furnishing of Bail Bond on 30.04.2027. (Snehil Sharma) Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01 PHC/New Delhi/18.08.2026 -- 3 of 12 -- 71 CC NI ACT/72642/2026 MS RELIANCE BROADCAST NETWORK LIMITED Vs D-DIVAS JEWELS PRIVATE LIMITED 18.08.2026(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex) Fresh case received. It be checked and registered. Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 35000+ cases. Present: Ms. Nandini, ld. counsel for the complainant. Matter is at the stage of consideration. In view of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India titled as Sanjabij Tari Vs. Kishore S Borcar, the notice u/s 223 BNSS need not be issued to proposed accused before taking the cognizance. 1. Arguments on behalf of the complainant heard on point of cognizance as well as summoning. 2. Present complaint is filed alleging that accused had issued the cheque(s) bearing No. 000088 of HDFC Bank to the complainant to discharge his/ her legal liability which got dishonored. Thereafter, complainant sent a legal demand notice and despite service of the same, accused failed to make the payment and thereby complainant prays to take cognizance U/Sec.142 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881/25 PASSA Act 2007. 3. After considering the present complaint, attached documents and the evidence of complainant by way of affidavit which is considered qua the requirement of section 202 of Cr.PC, I am of the view that Prima facie case is made out for the offence U/Sec. 138 of NI Act,1881/25 PASSA Act 2007 therefore, I take the cognizance in the present case for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of NI Act,1881/ 25 PASSA Act 2007.This court is of further opinion that prima facie there is sufficient material to proceed against the accused. 4 Dasti summons be issued against the accused D-DIVAS JEWELS PRIVATE LIMITED (signatory to the cheque) on filing of PF within 30 days for NDOH for the purpose of speed post/self delivery to the accused. Let summons be issued through all e modes/digital mode also on filing of email ID, whatsapp number, messaging application of the accused on affidavit alongwith PF and verification of the said particulars. Complainant is directed to file Tracking Report on NDOH. Complainant is also given an opportunity to file fresh address of accused alongwith affidavit of physical verification alongwith Google location of verification and photographs of the house. Time to follow strictly. Matter be put up for appearance of accused/furnishing of Bail Bond on 30.04.2027. (Snehil Sharma) Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01 PHC/New Delhi/18.08.2026 -- 4 of 12 -- 75 CC NI ACT/72646/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs Lakshman Meena 76 CC NI ACT/72647/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs Daanish Husain 77 CC NI ACT/72648/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs CHABIL AHMED MAZUMDER 78 CC NI ACT/72649/2026 FUTURE INVEST COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED Vs MEENAKSHI 79 CC NI ACT/72650/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs Rijwan Shah 80 CC NI ACT/72651/2026 Dev Bhumi Cold Chain Private Limited Vs Iqbal Naregal 81 CC NI ACT/72652/2026 FUTURE FINVEST COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED Vs NOORJAHAN 82 CC NI ACT/72653/2026 FUTURE FINVEST COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED Vs RAKHI 83 CC NI ACT/72654/2026 FUTURE FINVEST COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED Vs HANIFA BEGUM 84 CC NI ACT/72655/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs VIRENDRA PASI 85 CC NI ACT/72656/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs Radha 86 CC NI ACT/72657/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs Aadithya Kumar Kumbar 87 CC NI ACT/72658/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs Dipak Roy 88 CC NI ACT/72659/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs MOHIT KUMAR 89 CC NI ACT/72660/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs Chetan Balai 90 CC NI ACT/72661/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs Junu Kalita 91 CC NI ACT/72662/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs PRAMOD SINGH 92 CC NI ACT/72663/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs Bhima Ram Gurjar 93 CC NI ACT/72664/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs MOHAMAD ABDULAISH 94 CC NI ACT/72665/2026 FUTURE FINVEST COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED Vs PINKY 95 CC NI ACT/72666/2026 FUTURE FINVEST COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED Vs SURENDER KAUR 96 CC NI ACT/72667/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs Sarbjit Kaur 97 CC NI ACT/72668/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs SANTOSH KUMAR 98 CC NI ACT/72669/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs DOLI DEVI 99 CC NI ACT/72670/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs AASIF 100 CC NI ACT/72671/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs Raju Dom 101 CC NI ACT/72672/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs Sohit Kumar 102 CC NI ACT/72673/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs ADIVEPPA TOLI 103 CC NI ACT/72674/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs Arti Devi 104 CC NI ACT/72675/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs MUNFED 105 CC NI ACT/72676/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs RINKU SHARMA 106 CC NI ACT/72677/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs Bablu 107 CC NI ACT/72678/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs REKHA KUMARI 108 CC NI ACT/72679/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs JOBAN SINGH 109 CC NI ACT/72680/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs PAPPI 110 CC NI ACT/72681/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs ARJUN VERMA 18.08.2026(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex) Fresh case received. It be checked and registered. Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 35000+ cases. Parcha. Present: None. Matter is at the stage of consideration. Physical file has not yet been filed by the complainant. No original documents are shown which are necessary for the purpose of summoning, to ascertain that complainant is the holder of the cheque/mandate, to ascertain that e-filed documents are the genuine one and not the forged/self made and to avoid the duplicacy of the proceedings. Put up for consideration on 11.10.2028. (Snehil Sharma) Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01 PHC/New Delhi/18.08.2026 -- 5 of 12 -- 111 CC NI ACT/72682/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs RUPLI 112 CC NI ACT/72683/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs Mohan 113 CC NI ACT/72684/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs RUKMANI 114 CC NI ACT/72685/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs Ravi Kumar 115 CC NI ACT/72686/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs Sunkara Bala Gangadhara Bhargav 116 CC NI ACT/72687/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs MASUMA KHATUN 117 CC NI ACT/72688/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs Devi Prasad 118 CC NI ACT/72689/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs BRIJESH 119 CC NI ACT/72690/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs Jagdeesh 120 CC NI ACT/72691/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs ROHIM SHEKH 121 CC NI ACT/72692/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs CHHOTE LAL 122 CC NI ACT/72693/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs Sagar Kumar Arya 123 CC NI ACT/72694/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs Sukram 124 CC NI ACT/72695/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs GOVIND 125 CC NI ACT/72696/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs SHANAZ 126 CC NI ACT/72697/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs GAUTAM KUMAR 127 CC NI ACT/72698/2026 HERO FINCORP LTD Vs Chandni Devi 18.08.2026 (Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex) Fresh case received. It be checked and registered. Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 35000+ cases. Parcha. Present: None. Matter is at the stage of consideration. Physical file has not yet been filed by the complainant. No original documents are shown which are necessary for the purpose of summoning, to ascertain that complainant is the holder of the cheque/mandate, to ascertain that e-filed documents are the genuine one and not the forged/self made and to avoid the duplicacy of the proceedings. Put up for consideration on 11.10.2028. (Snehil Sharma) Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01 PHC/New Delhi/18.08.2026 -- 6 of 12 -- 67 CC NI ACT/72638/2026 Best Agrolife Limited Vs RAM PRAKASH, PROPRIETOR OF SHREE RAM KRASHI SEVA KENDRA 18.08.2026(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex) Fresh case received. It be checked and registered. Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 35000+ cases. Present: Ms. Jasmin Gill and Ms. Muskan Bansal, ld. counsel for the complainant. Matter is at the stage of consideration. In view of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India titled as Sanjabij Tari Vs. Kishore S Borcar, the notice u/s 223 BNSS need not be issued to proposed accused before taking the cognizance. 1. Arguments on behalf of the complainant heard on point of cognizance as well as summoning. 2. Present complaint is filed alleging that accused had issued the cheque(s) bearing No. 933031 of Indian Oversees Bank to the complainant to discharge his/ her legal liability which got dishonored. Thereafter, complainant sent a legal demand notice and despite service of the same, accused failed to make the payment and thereby complainant prays to take cognizance U/Sec.142 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881/25 PASSA Act 2007. 3. After considering the present complaint, attached documents and the evidence of complainant by way of affidavit which is considered qua the requirement of section 202 of Cr.PC, I am of the view that Prima facie case is made out for the offence U/Sec. 138 of NI Act,1881/25 PASSA Act 2007 therefore, I take the cognizance in the present case for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of NI Act,1881/ 25 PASSA Act 2007.This court is of further opinion that prima facie there is sufficient material to proceed against the accused. 4 Dasti summons be issued against the accused RAM PRAKASH, PROPRIETOR OF SHREE RAM KRASHI SEVA KENDRA (signatory to the cheque) on filing of PF within 30 days for NDOH for the purpose of speed post/self delivery to the accused. Let summons be issued through all e modes/digital mode also on filing of email ID, whatsapp number, messaging application of the accused on affidavit alongwith PF and verification of the said particulars. Complainant is directed to file Tracking Report on NDOH. Complainant is also given an opportunity to file fresh address of accused alongwith affidavit of physical verification alongwith Google location of verification and photographs of the house. Time to follow strictly. Matter be put up for appearance of accused/furnishing of Bail Bond on 30.04.2027. (Snehil Sharma) Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01 PHC/New Delhi/18.08.2026 -- 7 of 12 -- 68 CC NI ACT/72639/2026 Best Agrolife Limited Vs PRAMOD KUMAR, PROPRIETOR OF BUNDELKHAND AGRO 18.08.2026(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex) Fresh case received. It be checked and registered. Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 35000+ cases. Present: Ms. Jasmin Gill and Ms. Muskan Bansal, ld. counsel for the complainant. Matter is at the stage of consideration. In view of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India titled as Sanjabij Tari Vs. Kishore S Borcar, the notice u/s 223 BNSS need not be issued to proposed accused before taking the cognizance. 1. Arguments on behalf of the complainant heard on point of cognizance as well as summoning. 2. Present complaint is filed alleging that accused had issued the cheque(s) bearing No. 468515 of Canara Bank to the complainant to discharge his/ her legal liability which got dishonored. Thereafter, complainant sent a legal demand notice and despite service of the same, accused failed to make the payment and thereby complainant prays to take cognizance U/Sec.142 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881/25 PASSA Act 2007. 3. After considering the present complaint, attached documents and the evidence of complainant by way of affidavit which is considered qua the requirement of section 202 of Cr.PC, I am of the view that Prima facie case is made out for the offence U/Sec. 138 of NI Act,1881/25 PASSA Act 2007 therefore, I take the cognizance in the present case for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of NI Act,1881/ 25 PASSA Act 2007.This court is of further opinion that prima facie there is sufficient material to proceed against the accused. 4 Dasti summons be issued against the accused PRAMOD KUMAR, PROPRIETOR OF BUNDELKHAND AGRO (signatory to the cheque) on filing of PF within 30 days for NDOH for the purpose of speed post/self delivery to the accused. Let summons be issued through all e modes/digital mode also on filing of email ID, whatsapp number, messaging application of the accused on affidavit alongwith PF and verification of the said particulars. Complainant is directed to file Tracking Report on NDOH. Complainant is also given an opportunity to file fresh address of accused alongwith affidavit of physical verification alongwith Google location of verification and photographs of the house. Time to follow strictly. Matter be put up for appearance of accused/furnishing of Bail Bond on 30.04.2027. (Snehil Sharma) Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01 PHC/New Delhi/18.08.2026 -- 8 of 12 -- 69 CC NI ACT/72640/2026 Best Agrolife Limited Vs SUSHMA, PROPRIETOR OF SHRI RAM SEEDS AND PESTICIDE 18.08.2026(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex) Fresh case received. It be checked and registered. Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 35000+ cases. Present: Ms. Jasmin Gill and Ms. Muskan Bansal, ld. counsel for the complainant. Matter is at the stage of consideration. In view of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India titled as Sanjabij Tari Vs. Kishore S Borcar, the notice u/s 223 BNSS need not be issued to proposed accused before taking the cognizance. 1. Arguments on behalf of the complainant heard on point of cognizance as well as summoning. 2. Present complaint is filed alleging that accused had issued the cheque(s) bearing No. 000685 of Bank of Baroda to the complainant to discharge his/ her legal liability which got dishonored. Thereafter, complainant sent a legal demand notice and despite service of the same, accused failed to make the payment and thereby complainant prays to take cognizance U/Sec.142 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881/25 PASSA Act 2007. 3. After considering the present complaint, attached documents and the evidence of complainant by way of affidavit which is considered qua the requirement of section 202 of Cr.PC, I am of the view that Prima facie case is made out for the offence U/Sec. 138 of NI Act,1881/25 PASSA Act 2007 therefore, I take the cognizance in the present case for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of NI Act,1881/ 25 PASSA Act 2007.This court is of further opinion that prima facie there is sufficient material to proceed against the accused. 4 Dasti summons be issued against the accused SUSHMA, PROPRIETOR OF SHRI RAM SEEDS AND PESTICIDE (signatory to the cheque) on filing of PF within 30 days for NDOH for the purpose of speed post/self delivery to the accused. Let summons be issued through all e modes/digital mode also on filing of email ID, whatsapp number, messaging application of the accused on affidavit alongwith PF and verification of the said particulars. Complainant is directed to file Tracking Report on NDOH. Complainant is also given an opportunity to file fresh address of accused alongwith affidavit of physical verification alongwith Google location of verification and photographs of the house. Time to follow strictly. Matter be put up for appearance of accused/furnishing of Bail Bond on 30.04.2027. (Snehil Sharma) Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01 PHC/New Delhi/18.08.2026 -- 9 of 12 -- 72 CC NI ACT/72643/2026 Best Agrolife Limited Vs VIRENDRA SINGH, PROPRIETOR OF KANHAIYA BEEJ BHANDAR 18.08.2026(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex) Fresh case received. It be checked and registered. Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 35000+ cases. Present: Ms. Jasmin Gill and Ms. Muskan Bansal, ld. counsel for the complainant. Matter is at the stage of consideration. In view of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India titled as Sanjabij Tari Vs. Kishore S Borcar, the notice u/s 223 BNSS need not be issued to proposed accused before taking the cognizance. 1. Arguments on behalf of the complainant heard on point of cognizance as well as summoning. 2. Present complaint is filed alleging that accused had issued the cheque(s) bearing No. 083953 of IDBI Bank to the complainant to discharge his/ her legal liability which got dishonored. Thereafter, complainant sent a legal demand notice and despite service of the same, accused failed to make the payment and thereby complainant prays to take cognizance U/Sec.142 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881/25 PASSA Act 2007. 3. After considering the present complaint, attached documents and the evidence of complainant by way of affidavit which is considered qua the requirement of section 202 of Cr.PC, I am of the view that Prima facie case is made out for the offence U/Sec. 138 of NI Act,1881/25 PASSA Act 2007 therefore, I take the cognizance in the present case for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of NI Act,1881/ 25 PASSA Act 2007.This court is of further opinion that prima facie there is sufficient material to proceed against the accused. 4 Dasti summons be issued against the accused SVIRENDRA SINGH, PROPRIETOR OF KANHAIYA BEEJ BHANDAR(signatory to the cheque) on filing of PF within 30 days for NDOH for the purpose of speed post/self delivery to the accused. Let summons be issued through all e modes/digital mode also on filing of email ID, whatsapp number, messaging application of the accused on affidavit alongwith PF and verification of the said particulars. Complainant is directed to file Tracking Report on NDOH. Complainant is also given an opportunity to file fresh address of accused alongwith affidavit of physical verification alongwith Google location of verification and photographs of the house. Time to follow strictly. Matter be put up for appearance of accused/furnishing of Bail Bond on 30.04.2027. (Snehil Sharma) Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01 PHC/New Delhi/18.08.2026 -- 10 of 12 -- 73 CC NI ACT/72644/2026 Best Agrolife Limited Vs GEETA KUMARI, PROPRIETOR OF OM SAI TRADERS 18.08.2026(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex) Fresh case received. It be checked and registered. Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 35000+ cases. Present: Ms. Jasmin Gill and Ms. Muskan Bansal, ld. counsel for the complainant. Matter is at the stage of consideration. In view of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India titled as Sanjabij Tari Vs. Kishore S Borcar, the notice u/s 223 BNSS need not be issued to proposed accused before taking the cognizance. 1. Arguments on behalf of the complainant heard on point of cognizance as well as summoning. 2. Present complaint is filed alleging that accused had issued the cheque(s) bearing No. 995555 of Indian Bank to the complainant to discharge his/ her legal liability which got dishonored. Thereafter, complainant sent a legal demand notice and despite service of the same, accused failed to make the payment and thereby complainant prays to take cognizance U/Sec.142 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881/25 PASSA Act 2007. 3. After considering the present complaint, attached documents and the evidence of complainant by way of affidavit which is considered qua the requirement of section 202 of Cr.PC, I am of the view that Prima facie case is made out for the offence U/Sec. 138 of NI Act,1881/25 PASSA Act 2007 therefore, I take the cognizance in the present case for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of NI Act,1881/ 25 PASSA Act 2007.This court is of further opinion that prima facie there is sufficient material to proceed against the accused. 4 Dasti summons be issued against the accused GEETA KUMARI, PROPRIETOR OF OM SAI TRADERS (signatory to the cheque) on filing of PF within 30 days for NDOH for the purpose of speed post/self delivery to the accused. Let summons be issued through all e modes/digital mode also on filing of email ID, whatsapp number, messaging application of the accused on affidavit alongwith PF and verification of the said particulars. Complainant is directed to file Tracking Report on NDOH. Complainant is also given an opportunity to file fresh address of accused alongwith affidavit of physical verification alongwith Google location of verification and photographs of the house. Time to follow strictly. Matter be put up for appearance of accused/furnishing of Bail Bond on 30.04.2027. (Snehil Sharma) Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01 PHC/New Delhi/18.08.2026 -- 11 of 12 -- 74 CC NI ACT/72645/2026 Best Agrolife Limited Vs ANANGPAL, PROPRIETOR OF IFFDC KRISHAK SEWA KENDRA 18.08.2026(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex) Fresh case received. It be checked and registered. Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 35000+ cases. Present: Ms. Jasmin Gill and Ms. Muskan Bansal, ld. counsel for the complainant. Matter is at the stage of consideration. In view of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India titled as Sanjabij Tari Vs. Kishore S Borcar, the notice u/s 223 BNSS need not be issued to proposed accused before taking the cognizance. 1. Arguments on behalf of the complainant heard on point of cognizance as well as summoning. 2. Present complaint is filed alleging that accused had issued the cheque(s) bearing No. 000021 of HDFC Bank to the complainant to discharge his/ her legal liability which got dishonored. Thereafter, complainant sent a legal demand notice and despite service of the same, accused failed to make the payment and thereby complainant prays to take cognizance U/Sec.142 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881/25 PASSA Act 2007. 3. After considering the present complaint, attached documents and the evidence of complainant by way of affidavit which is considered qua the requirement of section 202 of Cr.PC, I am of the view that Prima facie case is made out for the offence U/Sec. 138 of NI Act,1881/25 PASSA Act 2007 therefore, I take the cognizance in the present case for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of NI Act,1881/ 25 PASSA Act 2007.This court is of further opinion that prima facie there is sufficient material to proceed against the accused. 4 Dasti summons be issued against the accused ANANGPAL, PROPRIETOR OF IFFDC KRISHAK SEWA KENDRA (signatory to the cheque) on filing of PF within 30 days for NDOH for the purpose of speed post/self delivery to the accused. Let summons be issued through all e modes/digital mode also on filing of email ID, whatsapp number, messaging application of the accused on affidavit alongwith PF and verification of the said particulars. Complainant is directed to file Tracking Report on NDOH. Complainant is also given an opportunity to file fresh address of accused alongwith affidavit of physical verification alongwith Google location of verification and photographs of the house. Time to follow strictly. Matter be put up for appearance of accused/furnishing of Bail Bond on 30.04.2027. (Snehil Sharma) Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01 PHC/New Delhi/18.08.2026 -- 12 of 12 --