Order 1

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 1 CC NI ACT/67980/2026 MITHILESH JHA Vs BALRAM SINGH
03.08.2026
(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex)
Fresh case received. It be checked and registered.
Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 37000+ cases.
Present: Sh. Vinay, ld. counsel for the complainant.
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
In view of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India titled as
Sanjabij Tari Vs. Kishore S Borcar, the notice u/s 223 BNSS need not be issued to
proposed accused before taking the cognizance.
1. Arguments on behalf of the complainant heard on point of cognizance as well as
summoning.
2. Present complaint is filed alleging that accused had issued the cheque(s) bearing No.
863372 of PNB Bank to the complainant to discharge his/ her legal liability which got
dishonored. Thereafter, complainant sent a legal demand notice and despite service of the same,
accused failed to make the payment and thereby complainant prays to take cognizance
U/Sec.142 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881/25 PASSA Act 2007.
3. After considering the present complaint, attached documents and the evidence of
complainant by way of affidavit which is considered qua the requirement of section 202 of
Cr.PC, I am of the view that Prima facie case is made out for the offence U/Sec. 138 of NI
Act,1881/25 PASSA Act 2007 therefore, I take the cognizance in the present case for the
offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of NI Act,1881/ 25 PASSA Act 2007.This court is of further
opinion that
prima facie there is sufficient material to proceed against the accused.
4 Dasti summons be issued against the accused Balram Singh (signatory to the
cheque) on filing of PF within 30 days for NDOH for the purpose of speed post/self delivery to
the accused.
Let summons be issued through all e modes/digital mode also on filing of email
ID, whatsapp number, messaging application of the accused on affidavit alongwith PF and
verification of the said particulars.
Complainant is directed to file Tracking Report on NDOH.
Complainant is also given an opportunity to file fresh address of accused
alongwith affidavit of physical verification alongwith Google location of verification and
photographs of the house.
Time to follow strictly.
Matter be put up for appearance of accused/furnishing of Bail Bond on 10.12.2026.
(Snehil Sharma)
Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
PHC/New Delhi/03.08.2026
-- 1 of 26 --
2 CC NI
ACT/67981/2026
Hero Fincorp Limited Vs BHAVANA DEVI
3 CC NI
ACT/67983/2026
Hero Fincorp Limited Vs RAJINI V
4 CC NI
ACT/67985/2026
Hero Fincorp Limited Vs RENU
5 CC NI
ACT/68012/2026
Hero Fincorp Limited Vs AYUB
6 CC NI
ACT/68014/2026
Hero Fincorp Limited Vs ANAND KUMAR
7 CC NI
ACT/68017/2026
Hero Fincorp Limited Vs DHANRAJ
8 CC NI
ACT/68019/2026
Hero Fincorp Limited Vs SAYRA
9 CC NI
ACT/68021/2026
Hero Fincorp Limited Vs RAMKISHUN
10 CC NI
ACT/68070/2026
Hero Fincorp Limited Vs LALMUNI DEVI
11 CC NI
ACT/68072/2026
Hero Fincorp Limited Vs NAWAL KISHOR GURJAR
12 CC NI
ACT/68074/2026
Hero Fincorp Limited Vs SATHISH
13 CC NI
ACT/68077/2026
Hero Fincorp Limited Vs PRITHAVI RAM
14 CC NI
ACT/68079/2026
Hero Fincorp Limited Vs HAJYA
15 CC NI
ACT/68081/2026
Hero Fincorp Limited Vs RAMBATI BAI
03.08.2026
(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex)
Fresh case received. It be checked and registered.
Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 37000+ cases.
Parcha.
Present: None.
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
Physical file has not yet been filed by the complainant.
No original documents are shown which are necessary for the purpose of summoning, to ascertain that
complainant is the holder of the cheque/mandate, to ascertain that e-filed documents are the genuine one and not the
forged/self made and to avoid the duplicacy of the proceedings.
Put up for consideration on 01.09.2028.
(Snehil Sharma)
Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
PHC/New Delhi/03.08.2026
-- 2 of 26 --
16 CC NI ACT/68083/2026 Hero Fincorp Limited Vs KAUSHAL
17 CC NI ACT/68085/2026 Hero Fincorp Limited Vs PRABHU KAMAT
18 CC NI ACT/68086/2026 Hero Fincorp Limited Vs MUNNA YADAV
19 CC NI ACT/68092/2026 Hero Fincorp Limited Vs UMMED BAIRWA
20 CC NI ACT/68095/2026 Hero Fincorp Limited Vs BALRAM
21 CC NI ACT/68096/2026 Hero Fincorp Limited Vs ASHFAK
22 CC NI ACT/68100/2026 Hero Fincorp Limited Vs RAJARAM
23 CC NI ACT/68104/2026 Hero Fincorp Limited Vs SANTOSH SINGH
24 CC NI ACT/68107/2026 Hero Fincorp Limited Vs RAMMURTI DEVI
25 CC NI ACT/68108/2026Hero Fincorp Limited Vs NITISH RAY
26 CC NI ACT/68110/2026 Hero Fincorp Limited Vs SHIVNARAYAN
27 CC NI ACT/68112/2026 Hero Fincorp Limited Vs SHEELO
28 CC NI ACT/68114/2026 Hero Fincorp Limited Vs RAM MILAN PAL
29 CC NI ACT/68117/2026 Hero Fincorp Limited Vs SURJIT SINGH
30 CC NI ACT/68118/2026Hero Fincorp Limited Vs GEETA DEVI
31 CC NI ACT/68120/2026 Hero Fincorp Limited Vs SATYAM KUMAR
32 CC NI ACT/68121/2026 Hero Fincorp Limited Vs DILKHUSH KUMAR
33 CC NI ACT/68123/2026 Hero Fincorp Limited Vs PARDEEP
34 CC NI ACT/68125/2026 Hero Fincorp Limited Vs ANIL
35 CC NI ACT/68126/2026 Hero Fincorp Limited Vs SUNITA DEVI
36 CC NI ACT/68128/2026 Hero Fincorp Limited Vs SOBITA TERONPI
37 CC NI ACT/68129/2026 Hero Fincorp Limited Vs KRISHAN NANDAN TANTI
38 CC NI ACT/68131/2026 Hero Fincorp Limited Vs SEVA
03.08.2026
(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex)
Fresh case received. It be checked and registered.
Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 37000+ cases.
Parcha.
Present: None.
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
Physical file has not yet been filed by the complainant.
No original documents are shown which are necessary for the purpose of summoning, to ascertain that
complainant is the holder of the cheque/mandate, to ascertain that e-filed documents are the genuine one and not the
forged/self made and to avoid the duplicacy of the proceedings.
Put up for consideration on 01.09.2028.
(Snehil Sharma)
Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
PHC/New Delhi/03.08.2026
-- 3 of 26 --
39 CC NI ACT/68132/2026 CAPITAL TRADE LINKS LIMITED Vs R H SCIENTIFIC INDIA
PRIVATE LIMITED
03.08.2026 (Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex)
Fresh case received. It be checked and registered.
Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 37000+ cases.
Present: Sh. Shubh Goyal, ld. counsel for the complainant with AR.
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
In view of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India titled as
Sanjabij Tari Vs. Kishore S Borcar, the notice u/s 223 BNSS need not be
issued to proposed accused before taking the cognizance.
1. Arguments on behalf of the complainant heard on point of cognizance as well as
summoning.
2. Present complaint is filed alleging that accused had issued the cheque(s) bearing No.
000016 of HDFC Bank to the complainant to discharge his/ her legal liability which got
dishonored. Thereafter, complainant sent a legal demand notice and despite service of the same,
accused failed to make the payment and thereby complainant prays to take cognizance
U/Sec.142 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881/25 PASSA Act 2007.
3. After considering the present complaint, attached documents and the evidence of
complainant by way of affidavit which is considered qua the requirement of section 202 of
Cr.PC, I am of the view that Prima facie case is made out for the offence U/Sec. 138 of NI
Act,1881/25 PASSA Act 2007 therefore, I take the cognizance in the present case for the
offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of NI Act,1881/ 25 PASSA Act 2007.This court is of further
opinion that
prima facie there is sufficient material to proceed against the accused.
4 Dasti summons be issued against the accused R H SCIENTIFIC INDIA PRIVATE
LIMITED, Hameed Ameer, Rohit Shankar, Piyush, Nisar, Vijay Kumar (signatory to the
cheque and Director) on filing of PF within 30 days for NDOH for the purpose of speed
post/self delivery to the accused.
Let summons be issued through all e modes/digital mode also on filing of email
ID, whatsapp number, messaging application of the accused on affidavit alongwith PF and
verification of the said particulars.
Complainant is directed to file Tracking Report on NDOH.
Complainant is also given an opportunity to file fresh address of accused
alongwith affidavit of physical verification alongwith Google location of verification and
photographs of the house.
Time to follow strictly.
Matter be put up for appearance of accused/furnishing of Bail Bond on
01.07.2027.
(Snehil Sharma)
Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
PHC/New Delhi/03.08.2026
-- 4 of 26 --
40 CC NI ACT/68135/2026 CAPITAL TRADE LINKS LIMITED Vs RICHESM HEALTHCARE
LIMITED
03.08.2026 (Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex)
Fresh case received. It be checked and registered.
Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 37000+ cases.
Present: Sh. Shubh Goyal, ld. counsel for the complainant with AR.
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
In view of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India titled as
Sanjabij Tari Vs. Kishore S Borcar, the notice u/s 223 BNSS need not be
issued to proposed accused before taking the cognizance.
1. Arguments on behalf of the complainant heard on point of cognizance as well as
summoning.
2. Present complaint is filed alleging that accused had issued the cheque(s) bearing No.
000759 of Bank of Baroda to the complainant to discharge his/ her legal liability which got
dishonored. Thereafter, complainant sent a legal demand notice and despite service of the same,
accused failed to make the payment and thereby complainant prays to take cognizance
U/Sec.142 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881/25 PASSA Act 2007.
3. After considering the present complaint, attached documents and the evidence of
complainant by way of affidavit which is considered qua the requirement of section 202 of
Cr.PC, I am of the view that Prima facie case is made out for the offence U/Sec. 138 of NI
Act,1881/25 PASSA Act 2007 therefore, I take the cognizance in the present case for the
offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of NI Act,1881/ 25 PASSA Act 2007.This court is of further
opinion that
prima facie there is sufficient material to proceed against the accused.
4 Dasti summons be issued against the accused RICHESM HEALTHCARE
LIMITED, Ashish Aggarwal, Dilmeet Kaur, Gurmeet Singh, Vishweshwar, Ramayan Prasad
(signatory to the cheque and Director) on filing of PF within 30 days for NDOH for the
purpose of speed post/self delivery to the accused.
Let summons be issued through all e modes/digital mode also on filing of email
ID, whatsapp number, messaging application of the accused on affidavit alongwith PF and
verification of the said particulars.
Complainant is directed to file Tracking Report on NDOH.
Complainant is also given an opportunity to file fresh address of accused
alongwith affidavit of physical verification alongwith Google location of verification and
photographs of the house.
Time to follow strictly.
Matter be put up for appearance of accused/furnishing of Bail Bond on
01.07.2027.
(Snehil Sharma)
Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
PHC/New Delhi/03.08.2026
-- 5 of 26 --
41 CC NI ACT/68138/2026 Capital Trade Links Ltd Vs Goswami Refineries Pvt Ltd And Ors
03.08.2026 (Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex)
Fresh case received. It be checked and registered.
Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 37000+ cases.
Present: Sh. Shubh Goyal, ld. counsel for the complainant with AR.
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
In view of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India titled as
Sanjabij Tari Vs. Kishore S Borcar, the notice u/s 223 BNSS need not be
issued to proposed accused before taking the cognizance.
1. Arguments on behalf of the complainant heard on point of cognizance as well as
summoning.
2. Present complaint is filed alleging that accused had issued the cheque(s) bearing No.
028858 of Central bank of India to the complainant to discharge his/ her legal liability which
got dishonored. Thereafter, complainant sent a legal demand notice and despite service of the
same, accused failed to make the payment and thereby complainant prays to take cognizance
U/Sec.142 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881/25 PASSA Act 2007.
3. After considering the present complaint, attached documents and the evidence of
complainant by way of affidavit which is considered qua the requirement of section 202 of
Cr.PC, I am of the view that Prima facie case is made out for the offence U/Sec. 138 of NI
Act,1881/25 PASSA Act 2007 therefore, I take the cognizance in the present case for the
offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of NI Act,1881/ 25 PASSA Act 2007.This court is of further
opinion that
prima facie there is sufficient material to proceed against the accused.
4 Dasti summons be issued against the accused Goswami Refineries, Prateek, Arpit
(signatory to the cheque and Director) on filing of PF within 30 days for NDOH for the
purpose of speed post/self delivery to the accused.
Let summons be issued through all e modes/digital mode also on filing of email
ID, whatsapp number, messaging application of the accused on affidavit alongwith PF and
verification of the said particulars.
Complainant is directed to file Tracking Report on NDOH.
Complainant is also given an opportunity to file fresh address of accused
alongwith affidavit of physical verification alongwith Google location of verification and
photographs of the house.
Time to follow strictly.
Matter be put up for appearance of accused/furnishing of Bail Bond on
25.03.2027.
(Snehil Sharma)
Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
PHC/New Delhi/03.08.2026
-- 6 of 26 --
42 CC NI
ACT/68141/2026
Planetcast Media Services Private Limited Vs MEDIA GURU NEWS PRIVATE LIMITED
(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex)
Fresh case received. It be checked and registered.
Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 37000+ cases.
Present: Sh. Karan Arora, ld. counsel for the complainant withAR.
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
In view of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India titled as
Sanjabij Tari Vs. Kishore S Borcar, the notice u/s 223 BNSS need not be
issued to proposed accused before taking the cognizance.
1. Arguments on behalf of the complainant heard on point of cognizance as well as
summoning.
2. Present complaint is filed alleging that accused had issued the cheque(s) bearing No.
001968 of ICICI Bank to the complainant to discharge his/ her legal liability which got
dishonored. Thereafter, complainant sent a legal demand notice and despite service of the same,
accused failed to make the payment and thereby complainant prays to take cognizance
U/Sec.142 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881/25 PASSA Act 2007.
3. After considering the present complaint, attached documents and the evidence of
complainant by way of affidavit which is considered qua the requirement of section 202 of
Cr.PC, I am of the view that Prima facie case is made out for the offence U/Sec. 138 of NI
Act,1881/25 PASSA Act 2007 therefore, I take the cognizance in the present case for the
offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of NI Act,1881/ 25 PASSA Act 2007.This court is of further
opinion that
prima facie there is sufficient material to proceed against the accused.
4 Dasti summons be issued against the accused MEDIA GURU NEWS PRIVATE
LIMITED, Arup Chatterjee (accused no. 2), Ayishik Chatterjee (accused no. 3), Baby
Chatterjee (accused no. 4) (signatory to the cheque and Director) on filing of PF within 30
days for NDOH for the purpose of speed post/self delivery to the accused.
Let summons be issued through all e modes/digital mode also on filing of email
ID, whatsapp number, messaging application of the accused on affidavit alongwith PF and
verification of the said particulars.
Complainant is directed to file Tracking Report on NDOH.
Complainant is also given an opportunity to file fresh address of accused
alongwith affidavit of physical verification alongwith Google location of verification and
photographs of the house.
Time to follow strictly.
Matter be put up for appearance of accused/furnishing of Bail Bond on
25.03.2027.
(Snehil Sharma)
Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
PHC/New Delhi/03.08.2026
-- 7 of 26 --
43 CC NI
ACT/68142/2026
Hero Fincorp Limited Vs DURGESH
44 CC NI
ACT/68143/2026
Hero Fincorp Limited Vs SHRAVAN SINGH CHOUHAN
03.08.2026
(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex)
Fresh case received. It be checked and registered.
Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 37000+ cases.
Parcha.
Present: None.
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
Physical file has not yet been filed by the complainant.
No original documents are shown which are necessary for the purpose of summoning,
to ascertain that complainant is the holder of the cheque/mandate, to ascertain that e-filed documents
are the genuine one and not the forged/self made and to avoid the duplicacy of the proceedings.
Put up for consideration on 01.09.2028.
(Snehil Sharma)
Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
PHC/New Delhi/03.08.2026
-- 8 of 26 --
45 CC NI
ACT/68146/2026
Hindware Home Innovation Ltd Vs Hukum Pratap
03.08.2026
(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex)
Fresh case received. It be checked and registered.
Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 37000+ cases.
Present: Sh. S.K. Gautam,ld. counsel for the complainant.
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
In view of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India titled as
Sanjabij Tari Vs. Kishore S Borcar, the notice u/s 223 BNSS need not be
issued to proposed accused before taking the cognizance.
1. Arguments on behalf of the complainant heard on point of cognizance as well as
summoning.
2. Present complaint is filed alleging that accused had issued the cheque(s) bearing No.
000006 of UCO Bank to the complainant to discharge his/ her legal liability which got
dishonored. Thereafter, complainant sent a legal demand notice and despite service of the same,
accused failed to make the payment and thereby complainant prays to take cognizance
U/Sec.142 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881/25 PASSA Act 2007.
3. After considering the present complaint, attached documents and the evidence of
complainant by way of affidavit which is considered qua the requirement of section 202 of
Cr.PC, I am of the view that Prima facie case is made out for the offence U/Sec. 138 of NI
Act,1881/25 PASSA Act 2007 therefore, I take the cognizance in the present case for the
offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of NI Act,1881/ 25 PASSA Act 2007.This court is of further
opinion that
prima facie there is sufficient material to proceed against the accused.
4 Dasti summons be issued against the accused Hukum Pratap prop. Of Singh
Electronics Place (signatory to the cheque) on filing of PF within 30 days for NDOH for the
purpose of speed post/self delivery to the accused.
Let summons be issued through all e modes/digital mode also on filing of email
ID, whatsapp number, messaging application of the accused on affidavit alongwith PF and
verification of the said particulars.
Complainant is directed to file Tracking Report on NDOH.
Complainant is also given an opportunity to file fresh address of accused
alongwith affidavit of physical verification alongwith Google location of verification and
photographs of the house.
Time to follow strictly.
Matter be put up for appearance of accused/furnishing of Bail Bond on
27.07.2027.
(Snehil Sharma)
Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
PHC/New Delhi/03.08.2026
-- 9 of 26 --
46 CC NI
ACT/68148/2026
Hindware Home Innovation Limited Vs Ugandhar Konda Prop Sri Ahobila Marketing
47 CC NI
ACT/68149/2026
M/s Surya Roshni Limited through AR Mr Anuj Sharma Vs Satbir Kaur Saluja alias Satbir Kaur
Inderjitsingh Saluja ProprietorSignatory
Ms Baaj Enterprises
48 CC NI
ACT/68151/2026
MS VIDYAMANDIR CLASSES LTD Vs RAHUL SHARMA
Sr.
No.
Cases Party Name
49 CC NI
ACT/68153/2026
MS VIDYAMANDIR CLASSES LTD Vs ANKUR SHARMA
03.08.2026
(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex)
Fresh case received. It be checked and registered.
Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 37000+ cases.
Parcha.
Present: None.
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
Physical file has not yet been filed by the complainant.
No original documents are shown which are necessary for the purpose of summoning,
to ascertain that complainant is the holder of the cheque/mandate, to ascertain that e-filed documents
are the genuine one and not the forged/self made and to avoid the duplicacy of the proceedings.
Put up for consideration on 01.09.2028.
(Snehil Sharma)
Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
PHC/New Delhi/03.08.2026
-- 10 of 26 --
50 CC NI
ACT/68154/2026
Dayanand Chaudhary Vs Ravindra Rai
(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex)
Fresh case received. It be checked and registered.
Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 37000+ cases.
Present: Sh. Gaurav Tripathi, ld. counsel for the complainant.
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
In view of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India titled as
Sanjabij Tari Vs. Kishore S Borcar, the notice u/s 223 BNSS need not be
issued to proposed accused before taking the cognizance.
1. Arguments on behalf of the complainant heard on point of cognizance as well as
summoning.
2. Present complaint is filed alleging that accused had issued the cheque(s) bearing No.
034260 of Union Bank to the complainant to discharge his/ her legal liability which got
dishonored. Thereafter, complainant sent a legal demand notice and despite service of the same,
accused failed to make the payment and thereby complainant prays to take cognizance
U/Sec.142 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881/25 PASSA Act 2007.
3. After considering the present complaint, attached documents and the evidence of
complainant by way of affidavit which is considered qua the requirement of section 202 of
Cr.PC, I am of the view that Prima facie case is made out for the offence U/Sec. 138 of NI
Act,1881/25 PASSA Act 2007 therefore, I take the cognizance in the present case for the
offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of NI Act,1881/ 25 PASSA Act 2007.This court is of further
opinion that
prima facie there is sufficient material to proceed against the accused.
4 Dasti summons be issued against the accused Ravindra Rai (signatory to the
cheque) on filing of PF within 30 days for NDOH for the purpose of speed post/self delivery to
the accused.
Let summons be issued through all e modes/digital mode also on filing of email
ID, whatsapp number, messaging application of the accused on affidavit alongwith PF and
verification of the said particulars.
Complainant is directed to file Tracking Report on NDOH.
Complainant is also given an opportunity to file fresh address of accused
alongwith affidavit of physical verification alongwith Google location of verification and
photographs of the house.
Time to follow strictly.
Matter be put up for appearance of accused/furnishing of Bail Bond on
25.03.2027.
(Snehil Sharma)
Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
PHC/New Delhi/03.08.2026
-- 11 of 26 --
51 CC NI
ACT/68156/2026
Hindware Home Innovation Ltd Vs Nimit Gupta
03.08.2026
(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex)
Fresh case received. It be checked and registered.
Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 37000+ cases.
Present: Sh. S.K. Gautam,ld. counsel for the complainant.
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
In view of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India titled as
Sanjabij Tari Vs. Kishore S Borcar, the notice u/s 223 BNSS need not be
issued to proposed accused before taking the cognizance.
1. Arguments on behalf of the complainant heard on point of cognizance as well as
summoning.
2. Present complaint is filed alleging that accused had issued the cheque(s) bearing No.
000016 of HDFC Bank to the complainant to discharge his/ her legal liability which got
dishonored. Thereafter, complainant sent a legal demand notice and despite service of the same,
accused failed to make the payment and thereby complainant prays to take cognizance
U/Sec.142 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881/25 PASSA Act 2007.
3. After considering the present complaint, attached documents and the evidence of
complainant by way of affidavit which is considered qua the requirement of section 202 of
Cr.PC, I am of the view that Prima facie case is made out for the offence U/Sec. 138 of NI
Act,1881/25 PASSA Act 2007 therefore, I take the cognizance in the present case for the
offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of NI Act,1881/ 25 PASSA Act 2007.This court is of further
opinion that
prima facie there is sufficient material to proceed against the accused.
4 Dasti summons be issued against the accused Nimit gupta, prop. Of Nirmal
Enterprises (signatory to the cheque) on filing of PF within 30 days for NDOH for the purpose
of speed post/self delivery to the accused.
Let summons be issued through all e modes/digital mode also on filing of email
ID, whatsapp number, messaging application of the accused on affidavit alongwith PF and
verification of the said particulars.
Complainant is directed to file Tracking Report on NDOH.
Complainant is also given an opportunity to file fresh address of accused
alongwith affidavit of physical verification alongwith Google location of verification and
photographs of the house.
Time to follow strictly.
Matter be put up for appearance of accused/furnishing of Bail Bond on
27.07.2027.
(Snehil Sharma)
Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
PHC/New Delhi/03.08.2026
-- 12 of 26 --
52 CC NI
ACT/68157/2026
Hindware Home Innovation Ltd Vs Sayamdeep Mohanty
03.08.2026
(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex)
Fresh case received. It be checked and registered.
Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 37000+ cases.
Present: Sh. S.K. Gautam,ld. counsel for the complainant.
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
Clarification sought with respect to delivery of legal notice.
Complainant is also given an opportunity to file last known address of
accused alongwith affidavit of physical verification alongwith Google location of
verification and photographs of the house as per judgment of HDFC Vs. Amit.
Put up for consideration on 01.09.2028.
(Snehil Sharma)
Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
PHC/New Delhi/03.08.2026
-- 13 of 26 --
53 CC NI
ACT/68158/2026
Hindware Home Innovation Ltd Vs Shivpal Awadhesh Upadhyay
03.08.2026
(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex)
Fresh case received. It be checked and registered.
Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 37000+ cases.
Present: Sh. S.K. Gautam,ld. counsel for the complainant.
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
In view of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India titled as
Sanjabij Tari Vs. Kishore S Borcar, the notice u/s 223 BNSS need not be
issued to proposed accused before taking the cognizance.
1. Arguments on behalf of the complainant heard on point of cognizance as well as
summoning.
2. Present complaint is filed alleging that accused had issued the cheque(s) bearing No.
000018 of HDFC Bank to the complainant to discharge his/ her legal liability which got
dishonored. Thereafter, complainant sent a legal demand notice and despite service of the same,
accused failed to make the payment and thereby complainant prays to take cognizance
U/Sec.142 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881/25 PASSA Act 2007.
3. After considering the present complaint, attached documents and the evidence of
complainant by way of affidavit which is considered qua the requirement of section 202 of
Cr.PC, I am of the view that Prima facie case is made out for the offence U/Sec. 138 of NI
Act,1881/25 PASSA Act 2007 therefore, I take the cognizance in the present case for the
offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of NI Act,1881/ 25 PASSA Act 2007.This court is of further
opinion that
prima facie there is sufficient material to proceed against the accused.
4 Dasti summons be issued against the accused Shivpal Awadhesh Upadhyay prop.
Of Balaji Sales (signatory to the cheque) on filing of PF within 30 days for NDOH for the
purpose of speed post/self delivery to the accused.
Let summons be issued through all e modes/digital mode also on filing of email
ID, whatsapp number, messaging application of the accused on affidavit alongwith PF and
verification of the said particulars.
Complainant is directed to file Tracking Report on NDOH.
Complainant is also given an opportunity to file fresh address of accused
alongwith affidavit of physical verification alongwith Google location of verification and
photographs of the house.
Time to follow strictly.
Matter be put up for appearance of accused/furnishing of Bail Bond on
27.07.2027.
(Snehil Sharma)
Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
PHC/New Delhi/03.08.2026
-- 14 of 26 --
54 CC NI
ACT/68161/2026
Hindware Home Innovation Ltd Vs Subham Seal
03.08.2026
(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex)
Fresh case received. It be checked and registered.
Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 37000+ cases.
Present: Sh. S.K. Gautam,ld. counsel for the complainant.
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
Perusal of the record shows that name mentioned as a signatory on the
cheque is Minto Seal, however, the name mentioned by the complainant in
memo is Shubham Seal.
Dasti court notice be issued against the accused’s bank on filing of PF/RC
within 30 days for NDOH for the purpose of speed post/self delivery to the
accused’s bank to clarify that who is the signatory of the cheque and to
whom the cheque belongs.
Complainant is directed to file Tracking Report on NDOH.
Time to follow strictly.
Ld. counsel for the complainant submits that he will also file the amended
memo.
Put up for consideration/PSE on 28.01.2027.
(Snehil Sharma)
Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
PHC/New Delhi/03.08.2026
-- 15 of 26 --
55 CC NI
ACT/68163/2026
Hindware Home Innovation Ltd Vs Narayanan
03.08.2026
(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex)
Fresh case received. It be checked and registered.
Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 37000+ cases.
Present: Sh. S.K. Gautam,ld. counsel for the complainant.
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
Clarification sought with respect to delivery of legal notice.
Complainant is also given an opportunity to file last known address of
accused alongwith affidavit of physical verification alongwith Google location of
verification and photographs of the house as per judgment HDFC Vs. Amit.
Put up for consideration on 01.09.2028.
(Snehil Sharma)
Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
PHC/New Delhi/03.08.2026
-- 16 of 26 --
56 CC NI
ACT/68164/2026
Hindware Home Innovation Ltd Vs Raghav Chawla
03.08.2026
(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex)
Fresh case received. It be checked and registered.
Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 37000+ cases.
Present: Sh. S.K. Gautam,ld. counsel for the complainant.
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
Clarification sought with respect to delivery of legal notice.
Complainant is also given an opportunity to file last known address of
accused alongwith affidavit of physical verification alongwith Google location of
verification and photographs of the house as per judgment HDFC Vs. Amit.
Put up for consideration on 01.09.2028.
(Snehil Sharma)
Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
PHC/New Delhi/03.08.2026
-- 17 of 26 --
57 CC NI ACT/68165/2026 Hindware Home Innovation Ltd Vs R D Group
03.08.2026
(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex)
Fresh case received. It be checked and registered.
Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 37000+ cases.
Present: Sh. S.K. Gautam,ld. counsel for the complainant.
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
Perusal of the record shows that no document is filed to suggest that the RD
group is partnership firm and who are all the partners.
Dasti court notice be issued against the accused’s bank on filing of PF/RC
within 30 days for NDOH for the purpose of speed post/self delivery to the
accused’s bank to clarify that who is the signatory of the cheque and to
whom the cheque belongs and who are account holders.
Complainant is directed to file Tracking Report on NDOH.
Time to follow strictly.
Ld. counsel for the complainant submits that he will also file the amended
memo.
Put up for consideration/PSE on 28.01.2027.
(Snehil Sharma)
Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
PHC/New Delhi/03.08.2026
-- 18 of 26 --
58 CC NI ACT/68167/2026
Hindware Home Innovation Limited Vs Raj Mani Prop Sai Traders
03.08.2026
(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex)
Fresh case received. It be checked and registered.
Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 37000+ cases.
Parcha.
Present: None.
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
Physical file has not yet been filed by the complainant.
No original documents are shown which are necessary for the purpose of summoning,
to ascertain that complainant is the holder of the cheque/mandate, to ascertain that e-filed documents
are the genuine one and not the forged/self made and to avoid the duplicacy of the proceedings.
Put up for consideration on 01.09.2028.
(Snehil Sharma)
Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
PHC/New Delhi/03.08.2026
-- 19 of 26 --
59 CC NI ACT/68168/2026 Hindware Home Innovation Ltd Vs Neeraj Prabhu
03.08.2026
(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex)
Fresh case received. It be checked and registered.
Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 37000+ cases.
Present: Sh. S.K. Gautam,ld. counsel for the complainant.
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
In view of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India titled as
Sanjabij Tari Vs. Kishore S Borcar, the notice u/s 223 BNSS need not be
issued to proposed accused before taking the cognizance.
1. Arguments on behalf of the complainant heard on point of cognizance as well as
summoning.
2. Present complaint is filed alleging that accused had issued the cheque(s) bearing No.
654639 of PNB Bank to the complainant to discharge his/ her legal liability which got
dishonored. Thereafter, complainant sent a legal demand notice and despite service of the same,
accused failed to make the payment and thereby complainant prays to take cognizance
U/Sec.142 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881/25 PASSA Act 2007.
3. After considering the present complaint, attached documents and the evidence of
complainant by way of affidavit which is considered qua the requirement of section 202 of
Cr.PC, I am of the view that Prima facie case is made out for the offence U/Sec. 138 of NI
Act,1881/25 PASSA Act 2007 therefore, I take the cognizance in the present case for the
offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of NI Act,1881/ 25 PASSA Act 2007.This court is of further
opinion that
prima facie there is sufficient material to proceed against the accused.
4 Dasti summons be issued against the accused Prabhu Enterprieses prop. Neeraj
Prabhu (signatory to the cheque) on filing of PF within 30 days for NDOH for the purpose of
speed post/self delivery to the accused.
Let summons be issued through all e modes/digital mode also on filing of email
ID, whatsapp number, messaging application of the accused on affidavit alongwith PF and
verification of the said particulars.
Complainant is directed to file Tracking Report on NDOH.
Complainant is also given an opportunity to file fresh address of accused
alongwith affidavit of physical verification alongwith Google location of verification and
photographs of the house.
Time to follow strictly.
Matter be put up for appearance of accused/furnishing of Bail Bond on
27.07.2027.
(Snehil Sharma)
Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
PHC/New Delhi/03.08.2026
-- 20 of 26 --
60 CC NI
ACT/68169/2026
Hindware Home Innovation Ltd Vs Vishal Kumar
03.08.2026
(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex)
Fresh case received. It be checked and registered.
Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 37000+ cases.
Present: Sh. S.K. Gautam,ld. counsel for the complainant.
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
In view of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India titled as
Sanjabij Tari Vs. Kishore S Borcar, the notice u/s 223 BNSS need not be
issued to proposed accused before taking the cognizance.
1. Arguments on behalf of the complainant heard on point of cognizance as well as
summoning.
2. Present complaint is filed alleging that accused had issued the cheque(s) bearing No.
387755 of SBI Bank to the complainant to discharge his/ her legal liability which got
dishonored. Thereafter, complainant sent a legal demand notice and despite service of the same,
accused failed to make the payment and thereby complainant prays to take cognizance
U/Sec.142 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881/25 PASSA Act 2007.
3. After considering the present complaint, attached documents and the evidence of
complainant by way of affidavit which is considered qua the requirement of section 202 of
Cr.PC, I am of the view that Prima facie case is made out for the offence U/Sec. 138 of NI
Act,1881/25 PASSA Act 2007 therefore, I take the cognizance in the present case for the
offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of NI Act,1881/ 25 PASSA Act 2007.This court is of further
opinion that
prima facie there is sufficient material to proceed against the accused.
4 Dasti summons be issued against the accused Vishal Kumar prop. Yuvraj
Enterprises (signatory to the cheque) on filing of PF within 30 days for NDOH for the purpose
of speed post/self delivery to the accused.
Let summons be issued through all e modes/digital mode also on filing of email
ID, whatsapp number, messaging application of the accused on affidavit alongwith PF and
verification of the said particulars.
Complainant is directed to file Tracking Report on NDOH.
Complainant is also given an opportunity to file fresh address of accused
alongwith affidavit of physical verification alongwith Google location of verification and
photographs of the house.
Time to follow strictly.
Matter be put up for appearance of accused/furnishing of Bail Bond on
27.07.2027.
(Snehil Sharma)
Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
PHC/New Delhi/03.08.2026
-- 21 of 26 --
61 CC NI
ACT/68170/2026
Hindware Home Innovation Limited Vs Pooja Mishra Prop Anavi Traders
62 CC NI
ACT/68171/2026
Hindware Home Innovation Limited Vs Gireesh Prop Sree Balaji Enterprises
63 CC NI
ACT/68172/2026
MANIKARAN CREDIT Vs HARSHWARDHAN GUPTA
64 CC NI
ACT/68173/2026
Hindware Home Innovation Limited Vs Bhavesh Bharatbhai Shah Prop Preksha Marketing Co
65 CC NI
ACT/68174/2026
Hindware Home Innovation Limited Vs Niraj Kumar Prop Smart Enterprises
Sr.
No.
Cases Party Name
66 CC NI
ACT/68175/2026
Hindware Home Innovation Limited Vs Peddi Mahendar Reddy Prop Sneha Distributors
67 CC NI
ACT/68176/2026
Hindware Home Innovation Limited Vs Sachin Chawla Prop Wings Electric Co
03.08.2026
(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex)
Fresh case received. It be checked and registered.
Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 37000+ cases.
Parcha.
Present: None.
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
Physical file has not yet been filed by the complainant.
No original documents are shown which are necessary for the purpose of summoning,
to ascertain that complainant is the holder of the cheque/mandate, to ascertain that e-filed documents
are the genuine one and not the forged/self made and to avoid the duplicacy of the proceedings.
Put up for consideration on 01.09.2028.
(Snehil Sharma)
Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
PHC/New Delhi/03.08.2026
-- 22 of 26 --
68 CC NI
ACT/68177/2026
Hindware Home Innovation Ltd Vs Aakash Goel
03.08.2026
(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex)
Fresh case received. It be checked and registered.
Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 37000+ cases.
Present: Sh. S.K. Gautam,ld. counsel for the complainant.
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
In view of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India titled as
Sanjabij Tari Vs. Kishore S Borcar, the notice u/s 223 BNSS need not be
issued to proposed accused before taking the cognizance.
1. Arguments on behalf of the complainant heard on point of cognizance as well as
summoning.
2. Present complaint is filed alleging that accused had issued the cheque(s) bearing No.
001006 of ICICI Bank to the complainant to discharge his/ her legal liability which got
dishonored. Thereafter, complainant sent a legal demand notice and despite service of the same,
accused failed to make the payment and thereby complainant prays to take cognizance
U/Sec.142 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881/25 PASSA Act 2007.
3. After considering the present complaint, attached documents and the evidence of
complainant by way of affidavit which is considered qua the requirement of section 202 of
Cr.PC, I am of the view that Prima facie case is made out for the offence U/Sec. 138 of NI
Act,1881/25 PASSA Act 2007 therefore, I take the cognizance in the present case for the
offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of NI Act,1881/ 25 PASSA Act 2007.This court is of further
opinion that
prima facie there is sufficient material to proceed against the accused.
4 Dasti summons be issued against the accused Akash Goel prop. Satguru
Enterprises (signatory to the cheque) on filing of PF within 30 days for NDOH for the purpose
of speed post/self delivery to the accused.
Let summons be issued through all e modes/digital mode also on filing of email
ID, whatsapp number, messaging application of the accused on affidavit alongwith PF and
verification of the said particulars.
Complainant is directed to file Tracking Report on NDOH.
Complainant is also given an opportunity to file fresh address of accused
alongwith affidavit of physical verification alongwith Google location of verification and
photographs of the house.
Time to follow strictly.
Matter be put up for appearance of accused/furnishing of Bail Bond on
27.07.2027.
(Snehil Sharma)
Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
PHC/New Delhi/03.08.2026
-- 23 of 26 --
69 CC NI
ACT/68178/2026
Hindware Home Innovation Limited Vs Shruti Agrawal Prop Green House
70 CC NI
ACT/68179/2026
Hindware Home Innovation Limited Vs Rohit Gangawar alias Rohit Rajeshwar Gangawar Prop R R
Distributors
03.08.2026
(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex)
Fresh case received. It be checked and registered.
Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 37000+ cases.
Parcha.
Present: None.
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
Physical file has not yet been filed by the complainant.
No original documents are shown which are necessary for the purpose of summoning,
to ascertain that complainant is the holder of the cheque/mandate, to ascertain that e-filed documents
are the genuine one and not the forged/self made and to avoid the duplicacy of the proceedings.
Put up for consideration on 01.09.2028.
(Snehil Sharma)
Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
PHC/New Delhi/03.08.2026
-- 24 of 26 --
71 CC NI
ACT/68180/2026
Hindware Home Innovation Ltd Vs Varun Sales
03.08.2026
(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex)
Fresh case received. It be checked and registered.
Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 37000+ cases.
Present: Sh. S.K. Gautam,ld. counsel for the complainant.
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
Perusal of the record shows that role of signatory is not clearly mentioned
and no document in this regard is filed.
Dasti court notice be issued against the accused’s bank on filing of PF/RC
within 30 days for NDOH for the purpose of speed post/self delivery to the
accused’s bank to clarify that who is the signatory of the cheque and to
whom the cheque belongs and role of the signatory.
Complainant is directed to file Tracking Report on NDOH.
Time to follow strictly.
Ld. counsel for the complainant submits that he will also file the amended
memo.
Put up for consideration/PSE on 28.01.2027.
(Snehil Sharma)
Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
PHC/New Delhi/03.08.2026
-- 25 of 26 --
72 CC NI ACT/68181/2026 Hero Fincorp Limited Vs VIRESH
73 CC NI ACT/68182/2026 Hero Fincorp Limited Vs JUGAL KISHOR
74 CC NIACT/68183/2026 Hero Fincorp Limited Vs SHANTI DEVI
75 CC NI ACT/68184/2026 Hero Fincorp Limited Vs CHANDRA KANTA
76 CC NI ACT/68185/2026 Hero Fincorp Limited Vs VIPIN KUMAR
77 CC NI ACT/68186/2026 Hero Fincorp Limited Vs SHAILENDRA NATH YADAV
78 CC NI ACT/68187/2026 Hero Fincorp Limited Vs KULDEEP
79 CC NI ACT/68189/2026 Hero Fincorp Limited Vs SANTOSH
80 CC NI ACT/68190/2026 Hero Fincorp Limited Vs GEETA
81 CC NI ACT/68192/2026 Hero Fincorp Limited Vs MOHD KAIF
82 CC NI ACT/68193/2026 Hero Fincorp Limited Vs VAGHARI PINTUBHAI HEMUBHAI
83 CC NI ACT/68194/2026 Hero Fincorp Limited Vs MEGU RATHOD
84 CC NI ACT/68196/2026 Hero Fincorp Limited Vs BATHVAR DEVAJIBHAI POLABHAI
85 CC NI ACT/68197/2026 Hero Fincorp Limited Vs TULARAM CHOUHAN
86 CC NI ACT/68201/2026 Hero Fincorp Limited Vs SARIKA CHOUHAN
87 CC NI ACT/68202/2026 Hero Fincorp Limited Vs KAMLA DEVI
88 CC NI ACT/68203/2026 Hero Fincorp Limited Vs JABAL SINGH
89 CC NI ACT/68205/2026 Hero Fincorp Limited Vs RAM KARAN
90 CC NI ACT/68207/2026 Hero Fincorp Limited Vs CHIRAG SANJAYKUMAR NERPAGAR
91 CC NI ACT/68208/2026 Hero Fincorp Limited Vs MORADHVAJ MORADHVAJ
92 CC NI ACT/68209/2026 Hero Fincorp Limited Vs NAZMIN SULTANA HOQUE
03.08.2026
(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex)
Fresh case received. It be checked and registered.
Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 37000+ cases.
Parcha.
Present: None.
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
Physical file has not yet been filed by the complainant.
No original documents are shown which are necessary for the purpose of summoning,
to ascertain that complainant is the holder of the cheque/mandate, to ascertain that e-filed documents
are the genuine one and not the forged/self made and to avoid the duplicacy of the proceedings.
Put up for consideration on 01.09.2028.
(Snehil Sharma)
Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
PHC/New Delhi/03.08.2026
-- 26 of 26 --