Full Order Text
Order 1 · 27 Jul 2026 · CNR DLND020793872025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 60 Cc Ni Act / 55501/2025 Moneywise Financial Services Pvt Ltd Vs. Jay Kay Hosiery Mills 61 Cc Ni Act / 55502/2025 Moneywise Financial Services Pvt Ltd Vs. Loop Techno Systems Pvt Ltd 62 Cc Ni Act / 55543/2025 Moneywise Financial Services Pvt Ltd Vs. Med Quest Diagnostics Pvt Ltd 63 Cc Ni Act / 55544/2025 Moneywise Financial Services Pvt Ltd Vs.Mohankumar Constructions Pvt Ltd 64 Cc Ni Act / 55568/2025 Moneywise Financial Services Pvt Ltd Vs. Saurabh Agarwal 65 Cc Ni Act / 55570/2025 Moneywise Financial Services Pvt Ltd Vs. Gurmeet Singh 66 Cc Ni Act / 55572/2025 Moneywise Financial Services Pvt Ltd Vs. Limco Global Services Pvt Ltd 67 Cc Ni Act / 55574/2025 Moneywise Financial Services Pvt Ltd Vs. Intelli Vectra Technologies Pvt Ltd 68 Cc Ni Act / 55576/2025 Moneywise Financial Services Pvt Ltd Vs. Gold Finger Est Private Limited 69 Cc Ni Act / 55578/2025 Moneywise Financial Services Pvt Ltd Vs. Srijan Spectrum Pvt Ltd 70 Cc Ni Act / 55580/2025 Moneywise Financial Services Pvt Ltd Vs. Kishankumar Anilbhai Pandya 71 Cc Ni Act / 55581/2025 Moneywise Financial Services Pvt Ltd Vs. Manminder Singh Narang 72 Cc Ni Act / 55582/2025 Moneywise Financial Services Pvt Ltd Vs. Razia Khatoon 73 Cc Ni Act / 55584/2025 Moneywise Financial Services Pvt Ltd Vs. Elm Designs Pvt Ltd 74 Cc Ni Act / 55585/2025 Moneywise Financial Services Pvt Ltd Vs. Jay Kay Hosiery Mills Pvt Ltd 75 Cc Ni Act / 55587/2025 Moneywise Financial Services Pvt Ltd Vs. Deo Shankar Jha 27.07.2026 Present : Sh. Pankaj, Ld. counsel for complainant. Physical file submitted. This complaint is filed U/s. 25 r/w Section 27 of the Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007. It is alleged in the complaint that the accused had issued the NACH mandate in favour of complainant in discharge of his liability. On presentation, the NACH mandate was returned dishonored. Thereafter, the complainant made the demand for the payment of the NACH mandate amount by giving the statutory notice. The accused failed to make the payment within the prescribed -- 1 of 2 -- period of 15 days from the receipt of the demand notice. Complaint perused. Documents perused. Prima-facie, there is sufficient material to proceed further. Accordingly, this Court takes cognizance of the offence U/s. 25 r/w Section 27 of the Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007. The complainant/AR of complainant has also filed his evidence by way of affidavit Ex.CW-1/A to prove the averments made in the complaint. It has led PSE by tendering the affidavit. The complainant/AR of complainant has reiterated the facts as averred in the complaint. Further, the complainant/AR of complainant states that the complainant does not wish to lead any further PSE. Thus, pre-summoning evidence on behalf of complainant is closed. I have heard arguments on point of summoning and perused the complaint, evidence by way of affidavit, bank memo, NACH mandate, demand notice and other documents on record. Prima facie the complaint is within limitation. In view of the averments made in the complaint, this Court has territorial jurisdiction to entertain this complaint. No other offence other than U/s. 25 r/w Section 27 of the Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007 is made out against the accused person(s). Perusal of the record shows that the accused is the individual. Let summons be issued to accused at the given address(es) through all permitted modes including dasti on filing of PF within 180 days, returnable 04.05.2028. Complainant is directed to file tracking report and affidavit of service on NDOH. (Siddhant Kumar) JMFC (NI Act)-05/PHC/NDD 27.07.2026 -- 2 of 2 --