Full Order Text
Order 1 · 27 Jul 2026 · CNR DLND020793402025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 79 Cc Ni Act / 55655/2025 Moneywise Financial Services Pvt Ltd Vs. Hema Giri 80 Cc Ni Act / 55656/2025 Moneywise Financial Services Pvt Ltd Vs. Abhay Deep Dubey 81 Cc Ni Act / 55658/2025 Moneywise Financial Services Pvt Ltd Vs. Kashyapi Infrastructure Pvt Ltd 82 Cc Ni Act / 55660/2025 Moneywise Financial Services Pvt Ltd Vs. Sandeep Miglani 83 Cc Ni Act / 55662/2025 Moneywise Financial Services Pvt Ltd Vs. Sv Yennams Hospitals Pvt Ltd 84 Cc Ni Act / 55663/2025 Moneywise Financial Services Pvt Ltd Vs. Richesm Healthcare Pvt Ltd 85 Cc Ni Act / 55665/2025 Moneywise Financial Services Pvt Ltd Vs. Rajeev Agrawal 87 Cc Ni Act / 55691/2025 Moneywise Financial Services Pvt Ltd Vs. Gunno Apparels Pvt Ltd 88 Cc Ni Act / 55692/2025 Moneywise Financial Services Pvt Ltd Vs. New Modern Technomech Pvt Ltd 89 Cc Ni Act / 55693/2025 Moneywise Financial Services Pvt Ltd Vs. Renu 90 Cc Ni Act / 55694/2025 Moneywise Financial Services Pvt Ltd Vs. Sunita Chauhan 92 Cc Ni Act / 55702/2025 Moneywise Financial Services Pvt Ltd Vs. Serum And Vaccines Inc 94 Cc Ni Act / 55709/2025 Moneywise Financial Services Pvt Ltd Vs. Param Renewable Energy Pvt Ltd 95 Cc Ni Act / 55710/2025 Moneywise Financial Services Pvt Ltd Vs. Ashish Kumar 27.07.2026 Present : Sh. Pankaj, Ld. counsel for complainant. Physical file submitted. This complaint is filed U/s. 25 r/w Section 27 of the Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007. It is alleged in the complaint that the accused had issued the NACH mandate in favour of complainant in discharge of his liability. On presentation, the NACH mandate was returned dishonored. Thereafter, the complainant made the demand for the payment of the NACH mandate amount by giving the statutory notice. The accused failed to make the payment within the prescribed period of 15 days from the receipt of the demand notice. Complaint perused. Documents perused. Prima-facie, there is sufficient material to proceed further. Accordingly, this Court takes cognizance of the offence U/s. 25 r/w Section 27 of the Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007. -- 1 of 2 -- The complainant/AR of complainant has also filed his evidence by way of affidavit Ex.CW-1/A to prove the averments made in the complaint. It has led PSE by tendering the affidavit. The complainant/AR of complainant has reiterated the facts as averred in the complaint. Further, the complainant/AR of complainant states that the complainant does not wish to lead any further PSE. Thus, pre-summoning evidence on behalf of complainant is closed. I have heard arguments on point of summoning and perused the complaint, evidence by way of affidavit, bank memo, NACH mandate, demand notice and other documents on record. Prima facie the complaint is within limitation. In view of the averments made in the complaint, this Court has territorial jurisdiction to entertain this complaint. No other offence other than U/s. 25 r/w Section 27 of the Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007 is made out against the accused person(s). Perusal of the record shows that the accused is the individual. Let summons be issued to accused at the given address(es) through all permitted modes including dasti on filing of PF within 180 days, returnable 11.05.2028. Complainant is directed to file tracking report and affidavit of service on NDOH. (Siddhant Kumar) JMFC (NI Act)-05/PHC/NDD 27.07.2026 -- 2 of 2 --