Order 1

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 30 CC NI ACT/52946/2026 MANISH KUMAR VERMA Vs PANKAJ RAJPUT
(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex)
Fresh case received. It be checked and registered.
Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 35000+ cases.
Present: Sh. Neeraj, ld. counsel for the complainant.
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
In view of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India titled as Sanjabij
Tari Vs. Kishore S Borcar, the notice u/s 223 BNSS need not be issued to
proposed accused before taking the cognizance.
1. Arguments on behalf of the complainant heard on point of cognizance as well as
summoning.
2. Present complaint is filed alleging that accused had issued the cheque(s) bearing No.
000007, 000014, 000015 of HDFC Bank, 007440 of Axis Bank to the complainant to
discharge his/ her legal liability which got dishonored. Thereafter, complainant sent a legal
demand notice and despite service of the same, accused failed to make the payment and
thereby complainant prays to take cognizance U/Sec.142 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881/25 PASSA Act
2007.
3. After considering the present complaint, attached documents and the evidence of
complainant by way of affidavit which is considered qua the requirement of section 202 of
Cr.PC, I am of the view that Prima facie case is made out for the offence U/Sec. 138 of NI
Act,1881/25 PASSA Act 2007 therefore, I take the cognizance in the present case for the
offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of NI Act,1881/ 25 PASSA Act 2007.This court is of further
opinion that
prima facie there is sufficient material to proceed against the accused.
4 Dasti summons be issued against the accused Pankaj Rajput (signatory to the
cheque) on filing of PF within 30 days for NDOH for the purpose of speed post/self delivery to
the accused.
Let summons be issued through all e modes/digital mode also on filing of email
ID, whatsapp number, messaging application of the accused on affidavit alongwith PF and
verification of the said particulars.
Complainant is directed to file Tracking Report on NDOH.
Complainant is also given an opportunity to file fresh address of accused
alongwith affidavit of physical verification alongwith Google location of verification and
photographs of the house.
Time to follow strictly.
Matter be put up for appearance of accused/furnishing of Bail Bond on 25.03.2027.
(Snehil Sharma)
Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
PHC/New Delhi/29.06.2026
-- 1 of 20 --
1 CC NI ACT/52888/2026 RAMENDRA KUMAR RAI Vs KANGFINZ PRIVATE LIMITED AND
ORS
(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex)
Fresh case received. It be checked and registered.
Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 35000+ cases.
Parcha.
Present: None.
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
Physical file has not yet been filed by the complainant.
No original documents are shown which are necessary for the purpose of
summoning, to ascertain that complainant is the holder of the cheque/mandate, to
ascertain that e-filed documents are the genuine one and not the forged/self made and
to avoid the duplicacy of the proceedings.
Put up for consideration on 11.05.2028.
(Snehil Sharma)
Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
PHC/New Delhi/29.06.2026
-- 2 of 20 --
2 CC NI ACT/52889/2026 MOHIT GOYAL Vs VINOD KUMAR GUPTA
(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex)
Fresh case received. It be checked and registered.
Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 35000+ cases.
Present: Sh. Rakesh Kumar, ld. counsel for the complainant.
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
In view of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India titled as Sanjabij
Tari Vs. Kishore S Borcar, the notice u/s 223 BNSS need not be issued to
proposed accused before taking the cognizance.
1. Arguments on behalf of the complainant heard on point of cognizance as well as
summoning.
2. Present complaint is filed alleging that accused had issued the cheque(s) bearing No.
000405 of UCO Bank to the complainant to discharge his/ her legal liability which got
dishonored. Thereafter, complainant sent a legal demand notice and despite service of the same,
accused failed to make the payment and thereby complainant prays to take cognizance
U/Sec.142 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881/25 PASSA Act 2007.
3. After considering the present complaint, attached documents and the evidence of
complainant by way of affidavit which is considered qua the requirement of section 202 of
Cr.PC, I am of the view that Prima facie case is made out for the offence U/Sec. 138 of NI
Act,1881/25 PASSA Act 2007 therefore, I take the cognizance in the present case for the
offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of NI Act,1881/ 25 PASSA Act 2007.This court is of further
opinion that
prima facie there is sufficient material to proceed against the accused.
4 Dasti summons be issued against the accused Vinod Kumar Gupta prop. Anmol
Sale Agency (signatory to the cheque) on filing of PF within 30 days for NDOH for the
purpose of speed post/self delivery to the accused.
Let summons be issued through all e modes/digital mode also on filing of email
ID, whatsapp number, messaging application of the accused on affidavit alongwith PF and
verification of the said particulars.
Complainant is directed to file Tracking Report on NDOH.
Complainant is also given an opportunity to file fresh address of accused
alongwith affidavit of physical verification alongwith Google location of verification and
photographs of the house.
Time to follow strictly.
Matter be put up for appearance of accused/furnishing of Bail Bond on 19.03.2027.
(Snehil Sharma)
Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
PHC/New Delhi/29.06.2026
-- 3 of 20 --
3 CC NI ACT/52890/2026 RAMENDRA KUMAR RAI Vs KANGFINZ PRIVATE LIMITED AND
ORS
(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex)
Fresh case received. It be checked and registered.
Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 35000+ cases.
Parcha.
Present: None.
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
Physical file has not yet been filed by the complainant.
No original documents are shown which are necessary for the purpose of
summoning, to ascertain that complainant is the holder of the cheque/mandate, to
ascertain that e-filed documents are the genuine one and not the forged/self made and
to avoid the duplicacy of the proceedings.
Put up for consideration on 11.05.2028.
(Snehil Sharma)
Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
PHC/New Delhi/29.06.2026
-- 4 of 20 --
4 CC NI ACT/52891/2026 VIKAS WALECHA Vs SHIVAM TIWARI
(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex)
Fresh case received. It be checked and registered.
Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 35000+ cases.
Present: Sh. Rakesh, ld. counsel for the complainant.
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
In view of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India titled as Sanjabij
Tari Vs. Kishore S Borcar, the notice u/s 223 BNSS need not be issued to
proposed accused before taking the cognizance.
1. Arguments on behalf of the complainant heard on point of cognizance as well as
summoning.
2. Present complaint is filed alleging that accused had issued the cheque(s) bearing No.
951255 of SBI Bank to the complainant to discharge his/ her legal liability which got
dishonored. Thereafter, complainant sent a legal demand notice and despite service of the same,
accused failed to make the payment and thereby complainant prays to take cognizance
U/Sec.142 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881/25 PASSA Act 2007.
3. After considering the present complaint, attached documents and the evidence of
complainant by way of affidavit which is considered qua the requirement of section 202 of
Cr.PC, I am of the view that Prima facie case is made out for the offence U/Sec. 138 of NI
Act,1881/25 PASSA Act 2007 therefore, I take the cognizance in the present case for the
offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of NI Act,1881/ 25 PASSA Act 2007.This court is of further
opinion that
prima facie there is sufficient material to proceed against the accused.
4 Dasti summons be issued against the accused Shivam Tiwari prop. Dev Cooling
water (signatory to the cheque) on filing of PF within 30 days for NDOH for the purpose of
speed post/self delivery to the accused.
Let summons be issued through all e modes/digital mode also on filing of email
ID, whatsapp number, messaging application of the accused on affidavit alongwith PF and
verification of the said particulars.
Complainant is directed to file Tracking Report on NDOH.
Complainant is also given an opportunity to file fresh address of accused
alongwith affidavit of physical verification alongwith Google location of verification and
photographs of the house.
Time to follow strictly.
Matter be put up for appearance of accused/furnishing of Bail Bond on 13.03.2027.
(Snehil Sharma)
Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
PHC/New Delhi/29.06.2026
-- 5 of 20 --
5 CC NI ACT/52892/2026 Aamir Jamal Vs Sandeep Rana
6 CC NI ACT/52893/2026 Aamir Jamal Vs Sandeep Rana
9 CC NI ACT/52896/2026 Aamir Jamal Vs Sandeep Rana
(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex)
Fresh case received. It be checked and registered.
Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 35000+ cases.
Parcha.
Present: None.
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
Physical file has not yet been filed by the complainant.
No original documents are shown which are necessary for the purpose of
summoning, to ascertain that complainant is the holder of the cheque/mandate, to
ascertain that e-filed documents are the genuine one and not the forged/self made and
to avoid the duplicacy of the proceedings.
Put up for consideration on 11.05.2028.
(Snehil Sharma)
Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
PHC/New Delhi/29.06.2026
-- 6 of 20 --
7 CC NI ACT/52894/2026 VIKAS WALECHA Vs GEET PRIYA
(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex)
Fresh case received. It be checked and registered.
Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 35000+ cases.
Present: Sh. Rakesh, ld. counsel for the complainant.
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
In view of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India titled as Sanjabij
Tari Vs. Kishore S Borcar, the notice u/s 223 BNSS need not be issued to
proposed accused before taking the cognizance.
1. Arguments on behalf of the complainant heard on point of cognizance as well as
summoning.
2. Present complaint is filed alleging that accused had issued the cheque(s) bearing No.
000011 of Indian Oversees Bank to the complainant to discharge his/ her legal liability which
got dishonored. Thereafter, complainant sent a legal demand notice and despite service of the
same, accused failed to make the payment and thereby complainant prays to take cognizance
U/Sec.142 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881/25 PASSA Act 2007.
3. After considering the present complaint, attached documents and the evidence of
complainant by way of affidavit which is considered qua the requirement of section 202 of
Cr.PC, I am of the view that Prima facie case is made out for the offence U/Sec. 138 of NI
Act,1881/25 PASSA Act 2007 therefore, I take the cognizance in the present case for the
offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of NI Act,1881/ 25 PASSA Act 2007.This court is of further
opinion that
prima facie there is sufficient material to proceed against the accused.
4 Dasti summons be issued against the accused Geet Priya prop. Shanvi Enterprises
(signatory to the cheque) on filing of PF within 30 days for NDOH for the purpose of speed
post/self delivery to the accused.
Let summons be issued through all e modes/digital mode also on filing of email
ID, whatsapp number, messaging application of the accused on affidavit alongwith PF and
verification of the said particulars.
Complainant is directed to file Tracking Report on NDOH.
Complainant is also given an opportunity to file fresh address of accused
alongwith affidavit of physical verification alongwith Google location of verification and
photographs of the house.
Time to follow strictly.
Matter be put up for appearance of accused/furnishing of Bail Bond on 13.03.2027.
(Snehil Sharma)
Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
PHC/New Delhi/29.06.2026
-- 7 of 20 --
8 CC NI ACT/52895/2026 MOHIT GOYAL Vs RATTAN SINGH YADAV
(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex)
Fresh case received. It be checked and registered.
Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 35000+ cases.
Present: Sh. Rakesh, ld. counsel for the complainant.
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
Clarification sought with respect to delivery of legal notice.
Perusal of record shows that as the complaint is filed after the 1st of July
2024, therefore provisions of BNSS apply in this case. Clarification sought with respect
to delivery of legal notice.
Complainant is also given an opportunity to file last known address of
accused alongwith affidavit of physical verification alongwith Google location of
verification and photographs of the house.
Put up for consideration on 13.03.2027.
(Snehil Sharma)
Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
PHC/New Delhi/29.06.2026
-- 8 of 20 --
10 CC NI ACT/52898/2026 MOHIT GOYAL Vs KRISHNA CHAND BANSAL
(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex)
Fresh case received. It be checked and registered.
Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 35000+ cases.
Present: Sh. Rakesh, ld. counsel for the complainant.
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
In view of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India titled as
Sanjabij Tari Vs. Kishore S Borcar, the notice u/s 223 BNSS need not be issued to
proposed accused before taking the cognizance.
1. Arguments on behalf of the complainant heard on point of cognizance as well as
summoning.
2. Present complaint is filed alleging that accused had issued the cheque(s) bearing No.
511285 of PNB to the complainant to discharge his/ her legal liability which got dishonored.
Thereafter, complainant sent a legal demand notice and despite service of the same, accused
failed to make the payment and thereby complainant prays to take cognizance U/Sec.142 of
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of Negotiable
Instruments Act, 1881/25 PASSA Act 2007.
3. After considering the present complaint, attached documents and the evidence of
complainant by way of affidavit which is considered qua the requirement of section 202 of
Cr.PC, I am of the view that Prima facie case is made out for the offence U/Sec. 138 of NI
Act,1881/25 PASSA Act 2007 therefore, I take the cognizance in the present case for the
offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of NI Act,1881/ 25 PASSA Act 2007.This court is of further
opinion that
prima facie there is sufficient material to proceed against the accused.
4 Dasti summons be issued against the accused KRISHNA CHAND BANSAL
Proprietor of laxmi agency (signatory to the cheque) on filing of PF within 30 days for NDOH
for the purpose of speed post/self delivery to the accused.
Let summons be issued through all e modes/digital mode also on filing of email
ID, whatsapp number, messaging application of the accused on affidavit alongwith PF and
verification of the said particulars.
Complainant is directed to file Tracking Report on NDOH.
Complainant is also given an opportunity to file fresh address of accused
alongwith affidavit of physical verification alongwith Google location of verification and
photographs of the house.
Time to follow strictly.
Matter be put up for appearance of accused/furnishing of Bail Bond on 13.03.2027.
(Snehil Sharma)
Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
PHC/New Delhi/29.06.2026
-- 9 of 20 --
11 CC NI ACT/52900/2026 RAMENDRA KUMAR RAI Vs ANUBHAV SHARMA AND ORS
12 CC NI ACT/52901/2026 Moneywise Financial Services Pvt Ltd Vs BIOHUB LIFESCIENCES PVT
LTD
13 CC NI ACT/52903/2026 Moneywise Financial Services Pvt Ltd Vs ARMAN ABDULMUNIF
SHAH
14 CC NI ACT/52905/2026 Moneywise Financial Services Pvt Ltd Vs KRISHAN KUMAR
15 CC NI ACT/52907/2026 Moneywise Financial Services Pvt Ltd Vs SUNIL KUMAR SHARMA
16 CC NI ACT/52909/2026 Moneywise Financial Services Pvt Ltd Vs MOHAMMED DAUD
17 CC NI ACT/52910/2026 Moneywise Financial Services Pvt Ltd Vs GEE IMPEX
18 CC NI ACT/52912/2026 Moneywise Financial Services Pvt Ltd Vs JS ENTERPISES
19 CC NI ACT/52914/2026 Moneywise Financial Services Pvt Ltd Vs PRADEEP SINGH
20 CC NI ACT/52916/2026 Moneywise Financial Services Pvt Ltd Vs JAIDEEP SINGH JODHA
(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex)
Fresh case received. It be checked and registered.
Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 35000+ cases.
Parcha.
Present: None.
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
Physical file has not yet been filed by the complainant.
No original documents are shown which are necessary for the purpose of
summoning, to ascertain that complainant is the holder of the cheque/mandate, to
ascertain that e-filed documents are the genuine one and not the forged/self made and
to avoid the duplicacy of the proceedings.
Put up for consideration on 11.05.2028.
(Snehil Sharma)
Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
PHC/New Delhi/29.06.2026
-- 10 of 20 --
21 CC NI ACT/52918/2026 Moneywise Financial Services Pvt Ltd Vs INDUSFLY TECHNOLOGIES
PRIVATE LIMITED
22 CC NI ACT/52920/2026 Moneywise Financial Services Pvt Ltd Vs VIKAS AGGARWAL
23 CC NI ACT/52922/2026 Moneywise Financial Services Pvt Ltd Vs EMD SCAFFOLDING INDIA
PVT LTD
24 CC NI ACT/52924/2026 Moneywise Financial Services Pvt Ltd Vs RACHNA MISHRA
Sr. No. Cases Party Name
25 CC NI ACT/52926/2026 Moneywise Financial Services Pvt Ltd Vs POONAM AGGARWAL
26 CC NI ACT/52942/2026 Moneywise Financial Services Pvt Ltd Vs TEJ SINGH
27 CC NI ACT/52943/2026 Moneywise Financial Services Pvt Ltd Vs VIRENDERA AND
COMPANY
28 CC NI ACT/52944/2026 KULDEEPAK MITTAL Vs HARVEST GLOBAL SSP PVT LTD
29 CC NI ACT/52945/2026 Moneywise Financial Services Pvt Ltd Vs SUNIL BANSAL
31 CC NI ACT/52947/2026 KCT TRADING P LTD Vs ANJANI VERMA
32 CC NI ACT/52948/2026 DISH TV INDIA LIMITED Vs Sofiya Entertainment Pvt Ltd
(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex)
Fresh case received. It be checked and registered.
Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 35000+ cases.
Parcha.
Present: None.
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
Physical file has not yet been filed by the complainant.
No original documents are shown which are necessary for the purpose of
summoning, to ascertain that complainant is the holder of the cheque/mandate, to
ascertain that e-filed documents are the genuine one and not the forged/self made and
to avoid the duplicacy of the proceedings.
Put up for consideration on 11.05.2028.
(Snehil Sharma)
Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
PHC/New Delhi/29.06.2026
-- 11 of 20 --
33 CC NI ACT/52949/2026 DHARA MOTOR FINANCE LIMITED Vs Mo Arshad
(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex)
Fresh case received. It be checked and registered.
Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 35000+ cases.
Present: Sh. Jasir Aftab, ld. counsel for the complainant.
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
In view of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India titled as Sanjabij
Tari Vs. Kishore S Borcar, the notice u/s 223 BNSS need not be issued to
proposed accused before taking the cognizance.
1. Arguments on behalf of the complainant heard on point of cognizance as well as
summoning.
2. Present complaint is filed alleging that accused had issued the cheque(s) bearing No.
318084 of Indusind Bank to the complainant to discharge his/ her legal liability which got
dishonored. Thereafter, complainant sent a legal demand notice and despite service of the same,
accused failed to make the payment and thereby complainant prays to take cognizance
U/Sec.142 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881/25 PASSA Act 2007.
3. After considering the present complaint, attached documents and the evidence of
complainant by way of affidavit which is considered qua the requirement of section 202 of
Cr.PC, I am of the view that Prima facie case is made out for the offence U/Sec. 138 of NI
Act,1881/25 PASSA Act 2007 therefore, I take the cognizance in the present case for the
offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of NI Act,1881/ 25 PASSA Act 2007.This court is of further
opinion that
prima facie there is sufficient material to proceed against the accused.
4 Dasti summons be issued against the accused Arshad (signatory to the cheque)
on filing of PF within 30 days for NDOH for the purpose of speed post/self delivery to the
accused.
Let summons be issued through all e modes/digital mode also on filing of email
ID, whatsapp number, messaging application of the accused on affidavit alongwith PF and
verification of the said particulars.
Complainant is directed to file Tracking Report on NDOH.
Complainant is also given an opportunity to file fresh address of accused
alongwith affidavit of physical verification alongwith Google location of verification and
photographs of the house.
Time to follow strictly.
Matter be put up for appearance of accused/furnishing of Bail Bond on 12.05.2028.
(Snehil Sharma)
Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
PHC/New Delhi/29.06.2026
-- 12 of 20 --
34 CC NI ACT/52950/2026 DHARA MOTOR FINANCE LIMITED Vs Yash Bhatia
(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex)
Fresh case received. It be checked and registered.
Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 35000+ cases.
Present: Sh. Jasir Aftab, ld. counsel for the complainant.
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
In view of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India titled as Sanjabij
Tari Vs. Kishore S Borcar, the notice u/s 223 BNSS need not be issued to
proposed accused before taking the cognizance.
1. Arguments on behalf of the complainant heard on point of cognizance as well as
summoning.
2. Present complaint is filed alleging that accused had issued the cheque(s) bearing No.
060651 of Indian Bank to the complainant to discharge his/ her legal liability which got
dishonored. Thereafter, complainant sent a legal demand notice and despite service of the same,
accused failed to make the payment and thereby complainant prays to take cognizance
U/Sec.142 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881/25 PASSA Act 2007.
3. After considering the present complaint, attached documents and the evidence of
complainant by way of affidavit which is considered qua the requirement of section 202 of
Cr.PC, I am of the view that Prima facie case is made out for the offence U/Sec. 138 of NI
Act,1881/25 PASSA Act 2007 therefore, I take the cognizance in the present case for the
offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of NI Act,1881/ 25 PASSA Act 2007.This court is of further
opinion that
prima facie there is sufficient material to proceed against the accused.
4 Dasti summons be issued against the accused Yash Bhatia (signatory to the
cheque) on filing of PF within 30 days for NDOH for the purpose of speed post/self delivery to
the accused.
Let summons be issued through all e modes/digital mode also on filing of email
ID, whatsapp number, messaging application of the accused on affidavit alongwith PF and
verification of the said particulars.
Complainant is directed to file Tracking Report on NDOH.
Complainant is also given an opportunity to file fresh address of accused
alongwith affidavit of physical verification alongwith Google location of verification and
photographs of the house.
Time to follow strictly.
Matter be put up for appearance of accused/furnishing of Bail Bond on 12.05.2028.
(Snehil Sharma)
Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
PHC/New Delhi/29.06.2026
-- 13 of 20 --
35 CC NI ACT/52951/2026 DHARA MOTOR FINANCE LIMITED Vs Kajal
(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex)
Fresh case received. It be checked and registered.
Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 35000+ cases.
Present: Sh. Jasir Aftab, ld. counsel for the complainant.
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
In view of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India titled as Sanjabij
Tari Vs. Kishore S Borcar, the notice u/s 223 BNSS need not be issued to
proposed accused before taking the cognizance.
1. Arguments on behalf of the complainant heard on point of cognizance as well as
summoning.
2. Present complaint is filed alleging that accused had issued the cheque(s) bearing No.
272643 of Indian Bank to the complainant to discharge his/ her legal liability which got
dishonored. Thereafter, complainant sent a legal demand notice and despite service of the same,
accused failed to make the payment and thereby complainant prays to take cognizance
U/Sec.142 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881/25 PASSA Act 2007.
3. After considering the present complaint, attached documents and the evidence of
complainant by way of affidavit which is considered qua the requirement of section 202 of
Cr.PC, I am of the view that Prima facie case is made out for the offence U/Sec. 138 of NI
Act,1881/25 PASSA Act 2007 therefore, I take the cognizance in the present case for the
offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of NI Act,1881/ 25 PASSA Act 2007.This court is of further
opinion that
prima facie there is sufficient material to proceed against the accused.
4 Dasti summons be issued against the accused Kajal (signatory to the cheque) on
filing of PF within 30 days for NDOH for the purpose of speed post/self delivery to the
accused.
Let summons be issued through all e modes/digital mode also on filing of email
ID, whatsapp number, messaging application of the accused on affidavit alongwith PF and
verification of the said particulars.
Complainant is directed to file Tracking Report on NDOH.
Complainant is also given an opportunity to file fresh address of accused
alongwith affidavit of physical verification alongwith Google location of verification and
photographs of the house.
Time to follow strictly.
Matter be put up for appearance of accused/furnishing of Bail Bond on 12.05.2028.
(Snehil Sharma)
Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
PHC/New Delhi/29.06.2026
-- 14 of 20 --
36 CC NI ACT/52952/2026 DHARA MOTOR FINANCE LIMITED Vs PRASHANT KUMAR
(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex)
Fresh case received. It be checked and registered.
Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 35000+ cases.
Present: Sh. Jasir Aftab, ld. counsel for the complainant.
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
In view of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India titled as Sanjabij
Tari Vs. Kishore S Borcar, the notice u/s 223 BNSS need not be issued to
proposed accused before taking the cognizance.
1. Arguments on behalf of the complainant heard on point of cognizance as well as
summoning.
2. Present complaint is filed alleging that accused had issued the cheque(s) bearing No.
004494 of Axis Bank to the complainant to discharge his/ her legal liability which got
dishonored. Thereafter, complainant sent a legal demand notice and despite service of the same,
accused failed to make the payment and thereby complainant prays to take cognizance
U/Sec.142 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881/25 PASSA Act 2007.
3. After considering the present complaint, attached documents and the evidence of
complainant by way of affidavit which is considered qua the requirement of section 202 of
Cr.PC, I am of the view that Prima facie case is made out for the offence U/Sec. 138 of NI
Act,1881/25 PASSA Act 2007 therefore, I take the cognizance in the present case for the
offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of NI Act,1881/ 25 PASSA Act 2007.This court is of further
opinion that
prima facie there is sufficient material to proceed against the accused.
4 Dasti summons be issued against the accused Prashant Kumar prop. Of Shiv
Trading Company (signatory to the cheque) on filing of PF within 30 days for NDOH for the
purpose of speed post/self delivery to the accused.
Let summons be issued through all e modes/digital mode also on filing of email
ID, whatsapp number, messaging application of the accused on affidavit alongwith PF and
verification of the said particulars.
Complainant is directed to file Tracking Report on NDOH.
Complainant is also given an opportunity to file fresh address of accused
alongwith affidavit of physical verification alongwith Google location of verification and
photographs of the house.
Time to follow strictly.
Matter be put up for appearance of accused/furnishing of Bail Bond on 12.05.2028.
(Snehil Sharma)
Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
PHC/New Delhi/29.06.2026
-- 15 of 20 --
37 CC NI ACT/52953/2026 DHARA MOTOR FINANCE LIMITED Vs MOHD DANISH
(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex)
Fresh case received. It be checked and registered.
Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 35000+ cases.
Present: Sh. Jasir Aftab, ld. counsel for the complainant.
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
In view of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India titled as Sanjabij
Tari Vs. Kishore S Borcar, the notice u/s 223 BNSS need not be issued to
proposed accused before taking the cognizance.
1. Arguments on behalf of the complainant heard on point of cognizance as well as
summoning.
2. Present complaint is filed alleging that accused had issued the cheque(s) bearing No.
000039 of HDFC Bank to the complainant to discharge his/ her legal liability which got
dishonored. Thereafter, complainant sent a legal demand notice and despite service of the same,
accused failed to make the payment and thereby complainant prays to take cognizance
U/Sec.142 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881/25 PASSA Act 2007.
3. After considering the present complaint, attached documents and the evidence of
complainant by way of affidavit which is considered qua the requirement of section 202 of
Cr.PC, I am of the view that Prima facie case is made out for the offence U/Sec. 138 of NI
Act,1881/25 PASSA Act 2007 therefore, I take the cognizance in the present case for the
offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of NI Act,1881/ 25 PASSA Act 2007.This court is of further
opinion that
prima facie there is sufficient material to proceed against the accused.
4 Dasti summons be issued against the accused Mohd. Danish (signatory to the
cheque) on filing of PF within 30 days for NDOH for the purpose of speed post/self delivery to
the accused.
Let summons be issued through all e modes/digital mode also on filing of email
ID, whatsapp number, messaging application of the accused on affidavit alongwith PF and
verification of the said particulars.
Complainant is directed to file Tracking Report on NDOH.
Complainant is also given an opportunity to file fresh address of accused
alongwith affidavit of physical verification alongwith Google location of verification and
photographs of the house.
Time to follow strictly.
Matter be put up for appearance of accused/furnishing of Bail Bond on 12.05.2028.
(Snehil Sharma)
Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
PHC/New Delhi/29.06.2026
-- 16 of 20 --
38 CC NI ACT/52954/2026 BCH ELECTRIC LIMITED Vs ANAND JAISWAL PROPRIETOR OF
KRISHNA SALES
(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex)
Fresh case received. It be checked and registered.
Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 35000+ cases.
Parcha.
Present: None.
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
Physical file has not yet been filed by the complainant.
No original documents are shown which are necessary for the purpose of
summoning, to ascertain that complainant is the holder of the cheque/mandate, to
ascertain that e-filed documents are the genuine one and not the forged/self made and
to avoid the duplicacy of the proceedings.
Put up for consideration on 11.05.2028.
(Snehil Sharma)
Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
PHC/New Delhi/29.06.2026
-- 17 of 20 --
39 CC NI ACT/52955/2026 DHARA MOTOR FINANCE LIMITED Vs Ismail
(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex)
Fresh case received. It be checked and registered.
Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 35000+ cases.
Present: Sh. Jasir Aftab, ld. counsel for the complainant.
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
In view of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India titled as Sanjabij
Tari Vs. Kishore S Borcar, the notice u/s 223 BNSS need not be issued to
proposed accused before taking the cognizance.
1. Arguments on behalf of the complainant heard on point of cognizance as well as
summoning.
2. Present complaint is filed alleging that accused had issued the cheque(s) bearing No.
000008 of HDFC Bank to the complainant to discharge his/ her legal liability which got
dishonored. Thereafter, complainant sent a legal demand notice and despite service of the same,
accused failed to make the payment and thereby complainant prays to take cognizance
U/Sec.142 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881/25 PASSA Act 2007.
3. After considering the present complaint, attached documents and the evidence of
complainant by way of affidavit which is considered qua the requirement of section 202 of
Cr.PC, I am of the view that Prima facie case is made out for the offence U/Sec. 138 of NI
Act,1881/25 PASSA Act 2007 therefore, I take the cognizance in the present case for the
offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of NI Act,1881/ 25 PASSA Act 2007.This court is of further
opinion that
prima facie there is sufficient material to proceed against the accused.
4 Dasti summons be issued against the accused Ismail (signatory to the cheque) on
filing of PF within 30 days for NDOH for the purpose of speed post/self delivery to the
accused.
Let summons be issued through all e modes/digital mode also on filing of email
ID, whatsapp number, messaging application of the accused on affidavit alongwith PF and
verification of the said particulars.
Complainant is directed to file Tracking Report on NDOH.
Complainant is also given an opportunity to file fresh address of accused
alongwith affidavit of physical verification alongwith Google location of verification and
photographs of the house.
Time to follow strictly.
Matter be put up for appearance of accused/furnishing of Bail Bond on 12.05.2028.
(Snehil Sharma)
Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
PHC/New Delhi/29.06.2026
-- 18 of 20 --
40 CC NI ACT/52956/2026 DHARA MOTOR FINANCE LIMITED Vs Mohd Ayyub
(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex)
Fresh case received. It be checked and registered.
Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 35000+ cases.
Present: Sh. Jasir Aftab, ld. counsel for the complainant.
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
Clarification sought with respect to role of signatory with the name imprinted
on the cheque.
Counsel for complainant submits that he will file the MCA data on NDOH.
Put up for consideration on 11.05.2028.
(Snehil Sharma)
Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
PHC/New Delhi/29.06.2026
-- 19 of 20 --
41 CC NI ACT/52957/2026 BLUE SKY BOOKS INTERNATIONAL Vs PRABASH KUMAR JHA
42 CC NI ACT/52958/2026 Narender Kumar Vs Naresh Kumar
(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex)
Fresh case received. It be checked and registered.
Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 35000+ cases.
Parcha.
Present: None.
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
Physical file has not yet been filed by the complainant.
No original documents are shown which are necessary for the purpose of
summoning, to ascertain that complainant is the holder of the cheque/mandate, to
ascertain that e-filed documents are the genuine one and not the forged/self made and
to avoid the duplicacy of the proceedings.
Put up for consideration on 11.05.2028.
(Snehil Sharma)
Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
PHC/New Delhi/29.06.2026
-- 20 of 20 --