Interim Order 3

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 33 Ct Cases / 631/2026
Rashim Sharma Vs. GMR Airports Limited
PS IGI Airport
11.05.2026
Today, the undersigned is also looking after the work of Ld.
ACJM-02, PHC, New Delhi.
Present: Complainants in person.
Sh. Manish Gandhi, ld. Counsel for the complainants
through VC.
SI Amit Kumar alongwith Insp. Sanjeev Kumar and ACP
Chandra Shekhar.
Report in terms of the previous order filed. CCTV footage of
the terminal-1/Domestic Airport also filed today. Copy be supplied.
As per the report, one driver of M/s JK Contractor was
examined but he denied his involvement, though he initially admitted that
he located the dog. The officials of M/s JK Contractor did not join the
inquiry. The official of DIAL have denied their involvement in the
relocation of the dogs.
The complainants have filed compilation of social media
reports of the dogs being detained in the airport area alongwith reports of
death of other dogs due to starvation. It is also submitted by Ld. Counsel
for the complainants that one FIR is also registered against DRDO in a
similar matter. The complainants have also filed a copy of social media
reports where it was stated on behalf of Delhi Airport that ‘Brown dog’
which had recently bitten two individuals and shown signs of aggression,
has been carefully handled, calmed and gently returned to its familiar
area. There was a second report also as per which, Delhi Airport has
written ‘At the same time, we learnt from some social media posts about
another dog at T-3 which has reportedly been missing since 26th March’.
It is submitted that the relocation of the dog has been done in a pre
planned manner. It is submitted by Ld. Counsel for the complainants that
the allegations are squarly covered U/s 325 BNS which is cognizable in
nature.
-- 1 of 2 --
It is further submitted by the complainant that Ct. Case No.
715/2026 (the said complaint is also heard together with the present case)
that as per the notification of the government dated 10.03.2023 in respect
of Animal Birth Control Rules 2022, none of the entities involved in the
incident were empowered to relocate the dogs permanently from the
Airport which was there usual feeding area.
It is asked from Insp. Sanjeev Kumar whether the inquiry in
respect of the complaints received at PS IGI Airport is complete and
whether any conclusive decision has been taken to either registered FIR
or for closure of the complaints, to which he has replied that legal
opinion is sought in the matter and conclusive decision in regard to the
action on the complaints is yet to be taken.
Since, it is yet to be informed to this Court whether FIR
would be registered on the complaints, further inquiry shall be conducted
in regard to the social media reports which are filed today by the
complainants. A conclusive inquiry report in regard to the action taken
alongwith the direction given today shall be filed by NDOH. The reports
which are filed today in the present case and which may be filed from the
NDOH shall also be considered in Ct. Case No. 715/2026.
SI Amit Kumar shall remain present on the NDOH.
Put up for further proceedings on 26.05.2026 at 02:00 Pm.
(PRANAV JOSHI)
ACJM-01/PHC/NDD
11.05.2026
-- 2 of 2 --