Full Order Text
Order 5 · 13 Aug 2025 · CNR DLND020349192024
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 103 CC NI ACT / 23883/2024 Manshl Negi Vs. 4a Ip Solution Advocates And Ip Attorneys 13.08.2025 Present: Ms. Rukshar, Ld. Counsel for the complainant. Sh. Pradeep Singh Negi, Ld. Counsel for the accused with accused through VC. Matter is at the stage of appearance of accused, furnishing of bail bonds and framing of notice since 19.09.2024. Bail bonds have not been furnished as of even date. Vide order dt. 29.03.2024, BWs issued against the accused were canceled and he was warned to be careful in future, however, on 04.07.2025, neither the bail bonds were furnished, nor the accused was present physically for the framing of notice u/s 251 CrPC. Again the accused was warned to be careful in future. However, again on 14.07.2025, neither the bail bonds were furnished, nor the accused was present physically for the framing of notice u/s 251 CrPC despite directions, accordingly, a cost of Rs. 3,000/- was imposed upon the accused. Today, neither the cost has been paid, nor the bail bonds have been furnished. Further, the accused is also not present physically for the framing of notice. At this stage, Ld. Counsel for the accused has requested to refer the present matter to mediation, the same has been objected by the Ld. Counsel for the complainant stating that accused has neither appeared before this court physically even for once for framing of notice nor has furnished his bail bonds. Contd..2/- -- 1 of 2 -- - 2 - In view of the aforesaid, this court is in agreement with the Ld. Counsel for the complainant, and it can be safely deduced that the accused is trying to derail the course of justice. Accordingly, a further cost of Rs. 6,000/- as mentioned vide order dt. 14.07.2025 is imposed upon the accused. It is pertinent to mention that the Ld. Counsel for the accused has sought an adjournment simply on the ground that the accused cannot appear physically owing to his personal difficulty, however, no reasonable explanation is forthcoming for not furnishing his bail bonds. Further, the accused has not appeared even for once before the court despite repeated directions, the concern of Ld. Counsel for the complainant that accused will not appear before Mediation proceedings as well is justified in terms of the aforesaid conduct of the accused. Considering the cheque amount in question, I am of the opinion that the present matter can be amicably settled. List the matter before upcoming Pre-Lok Adalat on 06.09.2025. (Vanshika Mehta) JMFC-04(NI Act)/PHC/NDD 13.08.2025 -- 2 of 2 --