Interim Order 5

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 103 CC NI ACT / 23883/2024
Manshl Negi Vs. 4a Ip Solution Advocates
And Ip Attorneys
13.08.2025
Present: Ms. Rukshar, Ld. Counsel for the complainant.
Sh. Pradeep Singh Negi, Ld. Counsel for the accused
with accused through VC.
Matter is at the stage of appearance of accused,
furnishing of bail bonds and framing of notice since 19.09.2024.
Bail bonds have not been furnished as of even date.
Vide order dt. 29.03.2024, BWs issued against the
accused were canceled and he was warned to be careful in future,
however, on 04.07.2025, neither the bail bonds were furnished, nor
the accused was present physically for the framing of notice u/s 251
CrPC. Again the accused was warned to be careful in future.
However, again on 14.07.2025, neither the bail bonds were furnished,
nor the accused was present physically for the framing of notice u/s
251 CrPC despite directions, accordingly, a cost of Rs. 3,000/- was
imposed upon the accused.
Today, neither the cost has been paid, nor the bail
bonds have been furnished. Further, the accused is also not present
physically for the framing of notice.
At this stage, Ld. Counsel for the accused has requested
to refer the present matter to mediation, the same has been objected
by the Ld. Counsel for the complainant stating that accused has
neither appeared before this court physically even for once for
framing of notice nor has furnished his bail bonds.
Contd..2/-
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
In view of the aforesaid, this court is in agreement with
the Ld. Counsel for the complainant, and it can be safely deduced that
the accused is trying to derail the course of justice.
Accordingly, a further cost of Rs. 6,000/- as mentioned
vide order dt. 14.07.2025 is imposed upon the accused. It is pertinent
to mention that the Ld. Counsel for the accused has sought an
adjournment simply on the ground that the accused cannot appear
physically owing to his personal difficulty, however, no reasonable
explanation is forthcoming for not furnishing his bail bonds. Further,
the accused has not appeared even for once before the court despite
repeated directions, the concern of Ld. Counsel for the complainant
that accused will not appear before Mediation proceedings as well is
justified in terms of the aforesaid conduct of the accused.
Considering the cheque amount in question, I am of the
opinion that the present matter can be amicably settled.
List the matter before upcoming Pre-Lok Adalat on
06.09.2025.
(Vanshika Mehta)
JMFC-04(NI Act)/PHC/NDD
13.08.2025
-- 2 of 2 --