Order 1

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 2 CC NI ACT/27386/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs MAMTA KUMARI
3 CC NI ACT/27387/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs PRADEEP
4 CC NI ACT/27389/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs PUSHPENDRA BHIL
5 CC NI ACT/27390/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs NAEEM
6 CC NI ACT/27392/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs SURESHA
7 CC NI ACT/27394/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs SAKA RAM
8 CC NI ACT/27395/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs ASHOK MEENA
9 CC NI ACT/27397/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs SUSHILA DENDOR
10 CC NI ACT/27399/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs K SABEERA
11 CC NI ACT/27403/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs GOPALA RAM
12 CC NI ACT/27405/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs ARVIND DAMOR
13 CC NI ACT/27408/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs VEERU
14 CC NI ACT/27410/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs RAMA ROAT
15 CC NI ACT/27412/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs MITHILESH KUMAR DUBEY
16 CC NI ACT/27414/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs SHIMMU MEENA
17 CC NI ACT/27416/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs KEDAR PRASAD PRAJAPAT
18 CC NI ACT/27419/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs AZAM
19 CC NI ACT/27421/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs LAKSHMANLAL
20 CC NI ACT/27422/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs VIRENDRA KUMAR RAJPUT
21 CC NI ACT/27425/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs HARIKESH
22 CC NI ACT/27427/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs HARISH VADERA
29 CC NI ACT/27442/2026 INDOSTAR CAPITAL FINANCE LIMITED Vs RAJESH KUMAR
34 CC NI ACT/27450/2026 VARUN BEVERAGES LIMITED Vs M/S AMIT TRADERS THROUGH
ITS PROPRIETOR MR AMIT KUMAR MADDESIYA
39 CC NI ACT/27460/2026 AMAN TRAVELS LTD Vs Madhushree Bhattacharjee Das
(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex)
Fresh case received. It be checked and registered.
Parcha.
Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 32000 cases.
Present: None.
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
Physical file has not yet been filed by the complainant.
No original documents are shown which are necessary for the purpose of
summoning, to ascertain that complainant is the holder of the cheque/mandate, to
ascertain that e-filed documents are the genuine one and not the forged/self made and
to avoid the duplicacy of the proceedings.
Put up for consideration on 14.10.2027.
(Snehil Sharma)
Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
PHC/New Delhi/06.04.2026
-- 1 of 18 --
42 CC NI ACT/27468/2026 VARUN BEVERAGES LIMITED Vs MAA SHEETAL ENTERPRISES
THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR MR ANIL KUMAR
44 CC NI ACT/27479/2026 VARUN BEVERAGES LIMITED Vs M/S ASHISH ENTERPRISES
THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR MS SONI
47 CC NI ACT/27487/2026 VARUN BEVERAGES LIMITED Vs M/S PANDEY MACHINERY
STORES THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR MR SANDEEP KUMAR PANDEY
48 CC NI ACT/27488/2026 VARUN BEVERAGES LIMITED Vs HAPPY TRADERS THROUGH
ITS PROPRIETOR MR MD SALMAN
49 CC NI ACT/27489/2026 DR MOREPEN LIMITED Vs Amardeep Pharma 000003
50 CC NI ACT/27490/2026 DR MOREPEN LIMITED Vs BHABANA DRUG DIST 187823
52 CC NI ACT/27492/2026 DR MOREPEN LIMITED Vs SHREE KRISHNA ENTERPRISES
000646
53 CC NI ACT/27493/2026 VARUN BEVERAGES LIMITED Vs OM TRADING COMPANY
THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR MR SUNIL KUMAR
Sr. No. Cases Party Name
54 CC NI ACT/27494/2026 DR MOREPEN LIMITED Vs MG SUPPLIMENT HUB 621953
55 CC NI ACT/27495/2026 Corteva Agriscience India Pvt Ltd Vs M/s Arindam Nandi
(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex)
Fresh case received. It be checked and registered.
Parcha.
Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 32000 cases.
Present: None.
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
Physical file has not yet been filed by the complainant.
No original documents are shown which are necessary for the purpose of
summoning, to ascertain that complainant is the holder of the cheque/mandate, to
ascertain that e-filed documents are the genuine one and not the forged/self made and
to avoid the duplicacy of the proceedings.
Put up for consideration on 14.10.2027.
(Snehil Sharma)
Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
PHC/New Delhi/06.04.2026
-- 2 of 18 --
75 CC NI ACT/27525/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs RAGU BANJARA
76 CC NI ACT/27526/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs PRAKASH
77 CC NI ACT/27527/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs SONELAL KUMAR
78 CC NI ACT/27529/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs RANI
79 CC NI ACT/27532/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs TANJIM
80 CC NI ACT/27534/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs REENA
81 CC NI ACT/27537/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs MANJU WADE
82 CC NI ACT/27539/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs DHAPU
83 CC NI ACT/27541/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs HUDI BAI
84 CC NI ACT/27543/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs SUNIL KUMAR
85 CC NI ACT/27545/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs MOHD ASIF
86 CC NI ACT/27547/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs RAJNI RASTOGI
87 CC NI ACT/27549/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs REKHA DEVI
88 CC NI ACT/27550/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs BHARAT KUMAR
89 CC NI ACT/27551/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs GOVINDBHAI HARSHANBHAI
KODARAVI
90 CC NI ACT/27552/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs SANJEET SAH
91 CC NI ACT/27553/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs BHADU SINGH
92 CC NI ACT/27554/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs LOKESH PARGI
93 CC NI ACT/27556/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs MOHD AAMIR
94 CC NI ACT/27558/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs MAHESH DINDOR
95 CC NI ACT/27560/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs TENIPAL
96 CC NI ACT/27562/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs HAMENT KHANT
97 CC NI ACT/27564/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs HAJI KHAN
98 CC NI ACT/27566/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs NILAM
99 CC NI ACT/27568/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs IMAM KHAN
100 CC NI ACT/27570/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs SUNITA DEVI
101 CC NI ACT/27572/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs MAKVANA SURESHBHAI
102 CC NI ACT/27574/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs GAJENDRA KUMAR
103 CC NI ACT/27577/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs SANJAY
104 CC NI ACT/27579/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs MANJUNATH MAHADEVAPPA
HUNAGUND
105 CC NI ACT/27581/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs DILKHUSH SALVI
106 CC NI ACT/27584/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs SAMOD KUMAR SINGHH
(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex)
Fresh case received. It be checked and registered.
Parcha.
Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 32000 cases.
Present: None.
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
Physical file has not yet been filed by the complainant.
No original documents are shown which are necessary for the purpose of summoning,
to ascertain that complainant is the holder of the cheque/mandate, to ascertain that e-filed documents
are the genuine one and not the forged/self made and to avoid the duplicacy of the proceedings.
Put up for consideration on 15.10.2027.
(Snehil Sharma)
Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
PHC/New Delhi/06.04.2026
-- 3 of 18 --
107 CC NI ACT/27586/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs FATEH SINGH
108 CC NI ACT/27588/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs GAGANDEEP SINGH
109 CC NI ACT/27589/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs BHAGABATI BAGARTTI
110 CC NI ACT/27591/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs SURTA
111 CC NI ACT/27593/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs MEHARBAN SINGH
112 CC NI ACT/27594/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs REENA MEENA
113 CC NI ACT/27595/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs PUNAM KUMARI
114 CC NI ACT/27598/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs SIMA
115 CC NI ACT/27600/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs KAVITHA K
116 CC NI ACT/27603/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs RAMKESH MEENA
117 CC NI ACT/27605/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs MOHAN LAL
118 CC NI ACT/27608/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs OM PRAKASH KHARWAR
119 CC NI ACT/27611/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs SATYVEER
120 CC NI ACT/27613/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs BITTU KUMAR
121 CC NI ACT/27615/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs AARIF HUSEN
122 CC NI ACT/27618/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs MUDAKAPPA
123 CC NI ACT/27620/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs GUDDI
124 CC NI ACT/27623/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs JUWELSON ENGLENG
125 CC NI ACT/27624/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs NATHI DEVI
126 CC NI ACT/27625/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs MAHAVEER SINGH CHUNDAWAT
127 CC NI ACT/27627/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs ANITA KUMARI
128 CC NI ACT/27629/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs AMIT KUMAR
129 CC NI ACT/27631/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs MUNEESH
130 CC NI ACT/27634/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs BHAGYU SHAH
(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex)
Fresh case received. It be checked and registered.
Parcha.
Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 32000 cases.
Present: None.
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
Physical file has not yet been filed by the complainant.
No original documents are shown which are necessary for the purpose of summoning,
to ascertain that complainant is the holder of the cheque/mandate, to ascertain that e-filed documents
are the genuine one and not the forged/self made and to avoid the duplicacy of the proceedings.
Put up for consideration on 15.10.2027.
(Snehil Sharma)
Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
PHC/New Delhi/06.04.2026
-- 4 of 18 --
131 CC NI ACT/27635/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs KAUSHALYA DEVI
132 CC NI ACT/27637/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs SARVESH KUMARI
133 CC NI ACT/27638/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs KALURAM
134 CC NI ACT/27639/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs MANISH RAJ
135 CC NI ACT/27640/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs CHANDA DEVI
136 CC NI ACT/27641/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs CHANDRKALA
137 CC NI ACT/27642/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs SUBHASH MAURYA
138 CC NI ACT/27643/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs JAYPARKASH YADAV
139 CC NI ACT/27644/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs JAMEEL
140 CC NI ACT/27645/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs SURAJ KUMAR
141 CC NI ACT/27646/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs SATEESH RAJPOOT
142 CC NI ACT/27647/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs RAJIV KUMAR
143 CC NI ACT/27648/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs PURAN MAL
144 CC NI ACT/27649/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs VIKASH KATARA
145 CC NI ACT/27650/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs LALIT MOHAN
146 CC NI ACT/27651/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs D P YADAV
147 CC NI ACT/27652/2026 HERO FINCORP LIMITED Vs ANUP KUMAR MISHRA
(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex)
Fresh case received. It be checked and registered.
Parcha.
Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 32000 cases.
Present: None.
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
Physical file has not yet been filed by the complainant.
No original documents are shown which are necessary for the purpose of summoning,
to ascertain that complainant is the holder of the cheque/mandate, to ascertain that e-filed documents
are the genuine one and not the forged/self made and to avoid the duplicacy of the proceedings.
Put up for consideration on 15.10.2027.
(Snehil Sharma)
Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
PHC/New Delhi/06.04.2026
-- 5 of 18 --
46 CC NI ACT/27485/2026 EKSUM COMTECH PRIVATE LIMITED Vs SP
CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
06.04.2026
(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex)
Fresh case received. It be checked and registered.
Long date is given as this court has pendency of over 33000 cases.
Present: Sh. Vaibhav Dubey, ld. counsel for the complainant.
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
In view of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India titled as Sanjabij Tari
Vs. Kishore S Borcar, the notice u/s 223 BNSS need not be issued to proposed
accused before taking the cognizance.
1. Arguments on behalf of the complainant heard on point of cognizance as well as
summoning.
2. Present complaint is filed alleging that accused had issued the cheque(s) bearing No.
174666 of Axis Bank to the complainant to discharge his/ her legal liability which got
dishonored. Thereafter, complainant sent a legal demand notice and despite service of the same,
accused failed to make the payment and thereby complainant prays to take cognizance
U/Sec.142 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881/25 PASSA Act 2007.
3. After considering the present complaint, attached documents and the evidence of
complainant by way of affidavit which is considered qua the requirement of section 202 of
Cr.PC, I am of the view that Prima facie case is made out for the offence U/Sec. 138 of NI
Act,1881/25 PASSA Act 2007 therefore, I take the cognizance in the present case for the
offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of NI Act,1881/ 25 PASSA Act 2007.This court is of further
opinion that
prima facie there is sufficient material to proceed against the accused.
4 Dasti summons be issued against the accused SP Construction company through
prop. Sumit Kumar (signatory to the cheque) on filing of PF within 30 days for NDOH for the
purpose of speed post/self delivery to the accused.
Let summons be issued through all e modes/digital mode also on filing of email
ID, whatsapp number, messaging application of the accused on affidavit alongwith PF and
verification of the said particulars.
Complainant is directed to file Tracking Report on NDOH.
Complainant is also given an opportunity to file fresh address of accused
alongwith affidavit of physical verification alongwith Google location of verification and
photographs of the house.
Time to follow strictly.
Matter be put up for appearance of accused/furnishing of Bail Bond on
28.10.2026.
(Snehil Sharma)
Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
PHC/New Delhi/06.04.2026
-- 6 of 18 --
31 CC NI ACT/27445/2026 IPL Biologicals Ltd Vs Veerbhadreshwara Agro Traders Through
Proprietors
06.04.2026
(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex)
Fresh case received. It be checked and registered.
Long date is given as this court has pendency of over 33000 cases.
Present: Sh. Anupam Kumar Jha, ld. counsel for the complainant.
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
In view of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India titled as Sanjabij Tari
Vs. Kishore S Borcar, the notice u/s 223 BNSS need not be issued to proposed
accused before taking the cognizance.
1. Arguments on behalf of the complainant heard on point of cognizance as well as
summoning.
2. Present complaint is filed alleging that accused had issued the cheque(s) bearing No.
122868 of Union Bank to the complainant to discharge his/ her legal liability which got
dishonored. Thereafter, complainant sent a legal demand notice and despite service of the same,
accused failed to make the payment and thereby complainant prays to take cognizance
U/Sec.142 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881/25 PASSA Act 2007.
3. After considering the present complaint, attached documents and the evidence of
complainant by way of affidavit which is considered qua the requirement of section 202 of
Cr.PC, I am of the view that Prima facie case is made out for the offence U/Sec. 138 of NI
Act,1881/25 PASSA Act 2007 therefore, I take the cognizance in the present case for the
offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of NI Act,1881/ 25 PASSA Act 2007.This court is of further
opinion that
prima facie there is sufficient material to proceed against the accused.
4 Dasti summons be issued against the accused M/s Sri Veerbhadreshwara Agro
Traders Through Proprietor Viresh Nehru Baligar (signatory to the cheque) on filing of PF
within 30 days for NDOH for the purpose of speed post/self delivery to the accused.
Let summons be issued through all e modes/digital mode also on filing of email
ID, whatsapp number, messaging application of the accused on affidavit alongwith PF and
verification of the said particulars.
Complainant is directed to file Tracking Report on NDOH.
Complainant is also given an opportunity to file fresh address of accused
alongwith affidavit of physical verification alongwith Google location of verification and
photographs of the house.
Time to follow strictly.
Matter be put up for appearance of accused/furnishing of Bail Bond on
10.02.2027.
(Snehil Sharma)
Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
PHC/New Delhi/06.04.2026
-- 7 of 18 --
32 CC NI ACT/27447/2026 Ms IPL Biologicals Ltd Vs m/s Om Shiv Krupa Krushi Udyog
Samuh
06.04.2026
(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex)
Fresh case received. It be checked and registered.
Long date is given as this court has pendency of over 33000 cases.
Present: Ms. Sunaina, ld. counsel for the complainant.
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
In view of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India titled as Sanjabij Tari
Vs. Kishore S Borcar, the notice u/s 223 BNSS need not be issued to proposed
accused before taking the cognizance.
1. Arguments on behalf of the complainant heard on point of cognizance as well as
summoning.
2. Present complaint is filed alleging that accused had issued the cheque(s) bearing No.
100147 of CSB Bank to the complainant to discharge his/ her legal liability which got
dishonored. Thereafter, complainant sent a legal demand notice and despite service of the same,
accused failed to make the payment and thereby complainant prays to take cognizance
U/Sec.142 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881/25 PASSA Act 2007.
3. After considering the present complaint, attached documents and the evidence of
complainant by way of affidavit which is considered qua the requirement of section 202 of
Cr.PC, I am of the view that Prima facie case is made out for the offence U/Sec. 138 of NI
Act,1881/25 PASSA Act 2007 therefore, I take the cognizance in the present case for the
offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of NI Act,1881/ 25 PASSA Act 2007.This court is of further
opinion that
prima facie there is sufficient material to proceed against the accused.
4 Dasti summons be issued against the accused m/s Om Shiv Krupa Krushi Udyog
Samuh prop. Bhal Chandra Shri Rang Kondakar (signatory to the cheque) on filing of PF
within 30 days for NDOH for the purpose of speed post/self delivery to the accused.
Let summons be issued through all e modes/digital mode also on filing of email
ID, whatsapp number, messaging application of the accused on affidavit alongwith PF and
verification of the said particulars.
Complainant is directed to file Tracking Report on NDOH.
Complainant is also given an opportunity to file fresh address of accused
alongwith affidavit of physical verification alongwith Google location of verification and
photographs of the house.
Time to follow strictly.
Matter be put up for appearance of accused/furnishing of Bail Bond on
10.02.2027.
(Snehil Sharma)
Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
PHC/New Delhi/06.04.2026
-- 8 of 18 --
33 CC NI ACT/27449/2026 MS IPL BIOLOGICALS LTD Vs M/s Laxmi Agro Agency
06.04.2026
(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex)
Fresh case received. It be checked and registered.
Long date is given as this court has pendency of over 33000 cases.
Present: Ms. Sunaina, ld. counsel for the complainant.
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
In view of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India titled as Sanjabij Tari
Vs. Kishore S Borcar, the notice u/s 223 BNSS need not be issued to proposed
accused before taking the cognizance.
1. Arguments on behalf of the complainant heard on point of cognizance as well as
summoning.
2. Present complaint is filed alleging that accused had issued the cheque(s) bearing No.
000108 of Bank of Baroda to the complainant to discharge his/ her legal liability which got
dishonored. Thereafter, complainant sent a legal demand notice and despite service of the same,
accused failed to make the payment and thereby complainant prays to take cognizance
U/Sec.142 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881/25 PASSA Act 2007.
3. After considering the present complaint, attached documents and the evidence of
complainant by way of affidavit which is considered qua the requirement of section 202 of
Cr.PC, I am of the view that Prima facie case is made out for the offence U/Sec. 138 of NI
Act,1881/25 PASSA Act 2007 therefore, I take the cognizance in the present case for the
offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of NI Act,1881/ 25 PASSA Act 2007.This court is of further
opinion that
prima facie there is sufficient material to proceed against the accused.
4 Dasti summons be issued against the accusedLaxmi Agro prop. Gajanan Baban
Chormare (signatory to the cheque) on filing of PF within 30 days for NDOH for the purpose
of speed post/self delivery to the accused.
Let summons be issued through all e modes/digital mode also on filing of email
ID, whatsapp number, messaging application of the accused on affidavit alongwith PF and
verification of the said particulars.
Complainant is directed to file Tracking Report on NDOH.
Complainant is also given an opportunity to file fresh address of accused
alongwith affidavit of physical verification alongwith Google location of verification and
photographs of the house.
Time to follow strictly.
Matter be put up for appearance of accused/furnishing of Bail Bond on
10.02.2027.
(Snehil Sharma)
Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
PHC/New Delhi/06.04.2026
-- 9 of 18 --
36 CC NI ACT/27454/2026 Ms IPL Biologicals Ltds Vs M/s Shree Chikadevamma Agro
Traders
06.04.2026
(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex)
Fresh case received. It be checked and registered.
Long date is given as this court has pendency of over 33000 cases.
Present: Ms. Sunaina, ld. counsel for the complainant.
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
In view of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India titled as Sanjabij Tari
Vs. Kishore S Borcar, the notice u/s 223 BNSS need not be issued to proposed
accused before taking the cognizance.
1. Arguments on behalf of the complainant heard on point of cognizance as well as
summoning.
2. Present complaint is filed alleging that accused had issued the cheque(s) bearing No.
282029 of Canara Bank to the complainant to discharge his/ her legal liability which got
dishonored. Thereafter, complainant sent a legal demand notice and despite service of the same,
accused failed to make the payment and thereby complainant prays to take cognizance
U/Sec.142 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881/25 PASSA Act 2007.
3. After considering the present complaint, attached documents and the evidence of
complainant by way of affidavit which is considered qua the requirement of section 202 of
Cr.PC, I am of the view that Prima facie case is made out for the offence U/Sec. 138 of NI
Act,1881/25 PASSA Act 2007 therefore, I take the cognizance in the present case for the
offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of NI Act,1881/ 25 PASSA Act 2007.This court is of further
opinion that
prima facie there is sufficient material to proceed against the accused.
4 Dasti summons be issued against the accused M/s Shree Chikadevamma Agro
Traders prop. Ravi (signatory to the cheque) on filing of PF within 30 days for NDOH for the
purpose of speed post/self delivery to the accused.
Let summons be issued through all e modes/digital mode also on filing of email
ID, whatsapp number, messaging application of the accused on affidavit alongwith PF and
verification of the said particulars.
Complainant is directed to file Tracking Report on NDOH.
Complainant is also given an opportunity to file fresh address of accused
alongwith affidavit of physical verification alongwith Google location of verification and
photographs of the house.
Time to follow strictly.
Matter be put up for appearance of accused/furnishing of Bail Bond on
10.02.2027.
(Snehil Sharma)
Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
PHC/New Delhi/06.04.2026
-- 10 of 18 --
38 CC NI ACT/27457/2026 MS IPL Biologicals Ltd Vs M/S ARAFA TRADING COMPANY
06.04.2026
(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex)
Fresh case received. It be checked and registered.
Long date is given as this court has pendency of over 33000 cases.
Present: Ms. Sunaina, ld. counsel for the complainant.
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
In view of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India titled as Sanjabij Tari
Vs. Kishore S Borcar, the notice u/s 223 BNSS need not be issued to proposed
accused before taking the cognizance.
1. Arguments on behalf of the complainant heard on point of cognizance as well as
summoning.
2. Present complaint is filed alleging that accused had issued the cheque(s) bearing No.
078911 of Axis Bank to the complainant to discharge his/ her legal liability which got
dishonored. Thereafter, complainant sent a legal demand notice and despite service of the same,
accused failed to make the payment and thereby complainant prays to take cognizance
U/Sec.142 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881/25 PASSA Act 2007.
3. After considering the present complaint, attached documents and the evidence of
complainant by way of affidavit which is considered qua the requirement of section 202 of
Cr.PC, I am of the view that Prima facie case is made out for the offence U/Sec. 138 of NI
Act,1881/25 PASSA Act 2007 therefore, I take the cognizance in the present case for the
offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of NI Act,1881/ 25 PASSA Act 2007.This court is of further
opinion that
prima facie there is sufficient material to proceed against the accused.
4 Dasti summons be issued against the accused M/S ARAFA TRADING
COMPANY prop. Anda Thodan Hussain (signatory to the cheque) on filing of PF within 30
days for NDOH for the purpose of speed post/self delivery to the accused.
Let summons be issued through all e modes/digital mode also on filing of email
ID, whatsapp number, messaging application of the accused on affidavit alongwith PF and
verification of the said particulars.
Complainant is directed to file Tracking Report on NDOH.
Complainant is also given an opportunity to file fresh address of accused
alongwith affidavit of physical verification alongwith Google location of verification and
photographs of the house.
Time to follow strictly.
Matter be put up for appearance of accused/furnishing of Bail Bond on
10.02.2027.
(Snehil Sharma)
Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
PHC/New Delhi/06.04.2026
-- 11 of 18 --
40 CC NI ACT/27463/2026 Ms IPL Biologicals Ltd Vs M/S ABI AGRO CHEMICALS
06.04.2026
(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex)
Fresh case received. It be checked and registered.
Long date is given as this court has pendency of over 33000 cases.
Present: Ms. Sunaina, ld. counsel for the complainant.
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
In view of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India titled as Sanjabij Tari
Vs. Kishore S Borcar, the notice u/s 223 BNSS need not be issued to proposed
accused before taking the cognizance.
1. Arguments on behalf of the complainant heard on point of cognizance as well as
summoning.
2. Present complaint is filed alleging that accused had issued the cheque(s) bearing No.
000002 of HDFC Bank to the complainant to discharge his/ her legal liability which got
dishonored. Thereafter, complainant sent a legal demand notice and despite service of the same,
accused failed to make the payment and thereby complainant prays to take cognizance
U/Sec.142 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881/25 PASSA Act 2007.
3. After considering the present complaint, attached documents and the evidence of
complainant by way of affidavit which is considered qua the requirement of section 202 of
Cr.PC, I am of the view that Prima facie case is made out for the offence U/Sec. 138 of NI
Act,1881/25 PASSA Act 2007 therefore, I take the cognizance in the present case for the
offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of NI Act,1881/ 25 PASSA Act 2007.This court is of further
opinion that
prima facie there is sufficient material to proceed against the accused.
4 Dasti summons be issued against the accused M/S Abhi Agro prop. Kasi Lingam
Somu (signatory to the cheque) on filing of PF within 30 days for NDOH for the purpose of
speed post/self delivery to the accused.
Let summons be issued through all e modes/digital mode also on filing of email
ID, whatsapp number, messaging application of the accused on affidavit alongwith PF and
verification of the said particulars.
Complainant is directed to file Tracking Report on NDOH.
Complainant is also given an opportunity to file fresh address of accused
alongwith affidavit of physical verification alongwith Google location of verification and
photographs of the house.
Time to follow strictly.
Matter be put up for appearance of accused/furnishing of Bail Bond on
10.02.2027.
(Snehil Sharma)
Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
PHC/New Delhi/06.04.2026
-- 12 of 18 --
1 CC NI ACT/27385/2026 M/S SUMANGLAM INTERNATIONAL PVT LTD Vs SAKET
MOURYA PROP MS IMAGE POWER INTERNATIONAL
06.04.2026
(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex)
Fresh case received. It be checked and registered.
Long date is given as this court has pendency of over 33000 cases.
Present: Sh. O.P. Swami and Ms. Shuchi Kumar, ld. counsel for the complainant with AR.
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
In view of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India titled as Sanjabij Tari
Vs. Kishore S Borcar, the notice u/s 223 BNSS need not be issued to proposed
accused before taking the cognizance.
1. Arguments on behalf of the complainant heard on point of cognizance as well as
summoning.
2. Present complaint is filed alleging that accused had issued the cheque(s) bearing No.
124813 of Bank of Maharashtra to the complainant to discharge his/ her legal liability which
got dishonored. Thereafter, complainant sent a legal demand notice and despite service of the
same, accused failed to make the payment and thereby complainant prays to take cognizance
U/Sec.142 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881/25 PASSA Act 2007.
3. After considering the present complaint, attached documents and the evidence of
complainant by way of affidavit which is considered qua the requirement of section 202 of
Cr.PC, I am of the view that Prima facie case is made out for the offence U/Sec. 138 of NI
Act,1881/25 PASSA Act 2007 therefore, I take the cognizance in the present case for the
offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of NI Act,1881/ 25 PASSA Act 2007.This court is of further
opinion that
prima facie there is sufficient material to proceed against the accused.
4 Dasti summons be issued against the accused SAKET MOURYA PROP MS
IMAGE POWER INTERNATIONAL(signatory to the cheque) on filing of PF within 30 days
for NDOH for the purpose of speed post/self delivery to the accused.
Let summons be issued through all e modes/digital mode also on filing of email
ID, whatsapp number, messaging application of the accused on affidavit alongwith PF and
verification of the said particulars.
Complainant is directed to file Tracking Report on NDOH.
Complainant is also given an opportunity to file fresh address of accused
alongwith affidavit of physical verification alongwith Google location of verification and
photographs of the house.
Time to follow strictly.
Matter be put up for appearance of accused/furnishing of Bail Bond on
18.11.2026.
(Snehil Sharma)
Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
PHC/New Delhi/06.04.2026
-- 13 of 18 --
62 CC NI ACT/27502/2026 Sammaan Capital Limited Vs DHANALAXMI VEMULA
23 CC NI ACT/27430/2026 Sammaan Capital Limited Vs SIJO JOSE
24 CC NI ACT/27432/2026 Sammaan Capital Limited Vs VACL INDIA REAL ESTATE LIMITED
25 CC NI ACT/27434/2026 Sammaan Capital Limited Vs TEJAS SHANKAR DOIPHODE
26 CC NI ACT/27437/2026 Sammaan Capital Limited Vs NITIN PRALHAD BHADANE
27 CC NI ACT/27439/2026 Sammaan Capital Limited Vs SHREE GANRAJ ELECTRICAL
28 CC NI ACT/27441/2026 Sammaan Capital Limited Vs AJITABH SINGH
30 CC NI ACT/27443/2026 Sammaan Capital Limited Vs KARE V
56 CC NI ACT/27496/2026 Sammaan Capital Limited Vs ANIL KUMAR
57 CC NI ACT/27497/2026 Sammaan Capital Limited Vs TEJ ANAND
58 CC NI ACT/27498/2026 Sammaan Capital Limited Vs GEORGE EV JOBY
59 CC NI ACT/27499/2026 Sammaan Capital Limited Vs CHETAN D AVASARKAR
60 CC NI ACT/27500/2026 Sammaan Capital Limited Vs SRI LAKSHMI AGRO FOODS
61 CC NI ACT/27501/2026 Sammaan Capital Limited Vs NAVNEET SINGH SAWHNEY
63 CC NI ACT/27503/2026 Sammaan Capital Limited Vs PRADIP BHAGWAN HASE
64 CC NI ACT/27504/2026 Sammaan Capital Limited Vs VINAY MADAN
65 CC NI ACT/27505/2026 Sammaan Capital Limited Vs B N V RAO
66 CC NI ACT/27506/2026 Sammaan Capital Limited Vs ARSHAD CHAUDHARY
67 CC NI ACT/27507/2026 Sammaan Capital Limited Vs KARE
68 CC NI ACT/27508/2026 Sammaan Capital Limited Vs JASBIR SINGH AHLAWAT
69 CC NI ACT/27509/2026 Sammaan Capital Limited Vs SHAYAM LAL
70 CC NI ACT/27510/2026 Sammaan Capital Limited Vs MANDAR A NANAWARE
71 CC NI ACT/27511/2026 Sammaan Capital Limited Vs SRINIVASULU REDDY JANGA
72 CC NI ACT/27519/2026 Sammaan Capital Limited Vs HIMANSHU SHARMA
73 CC NI ACT/27521/2026 Sammaan Capital Limited Vs F M ENTERPRISES
74 CC NI ACT/27522/2026 Sammaan Capital Limited Vs N SUDHAKARAN
06.04.2026
(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex)
Fresh case received. It be checked and registered.
Long date is given as this court has pendency of over 33000 cases.
Present: Sh. Shambu Kumar, ld. counsel for the complainant with AR.
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
Clarification sought with respect to name mentioned in mandate and name
mentioned of complainant in memo of party as both are different names and no
document qua the change of name is filed.
ld. counsel for the complainant submits that he will file the same on NDOH.
Put up for consideration on 12.02.2027.
(Snehil Sharma)
Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
PHC/New Delhi/06.04.2026
-- 14 of 18 --
35 CC NI ACT/27452/2026 IPL Biologicals Ltd Vs Sri Raghvendra Agro Traders
Through Proprietor
06.04.2026
(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex)
Fresh case received. It be checked and registered.
Long date is given as this court has pendency of over 33000 cases.
Present: Sh. Anupam Kumar Jha, ld. counsel for the complainant.
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
In view of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India titled as Sanjabij Tari
Vs. Kishore S Borcar, the notice u/s 223 BNSS need not be issued to proposed
accused before taking the cognizance.
1. Arguments on behalf of the complainant heard on point of cognizance as well as
summoning.
2. Present complaint is filed alleging that accused had issued the cheque(s) bearing No.
000006 of HDFC Bank to the complainant to discharge his/ her legal liability which got
dishonored. Thereafter, complainant sent a legal demand notice and despite service of the same,
accused failed to make the payment and thereby complainant prays to take cognizance
U/Sec.142 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881/25 PASSA Act 2007.
3. After considering the present complaint, attached documents and the evidence of
complainant by way of affidavit which is considered qua the requirement of section 202 of
Cr.PC, I am of the view that Prima facie case is made out for the offence U/Sec. 138 of NI
Act,1881/25 PASSA Act 2007 therefore, I take the cognizance in the present case for the
offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of NI Act,1881/ 25 PASSA Act 2007.This court is of further
opinion that
prima facie there is sufficient material to proceed against the accused.
4 Dasti summons be issued against the accused Sri Raghvendra Agro Traders
Through Proprietor Pradeep Kumar (signatory to the cheque) on filing of PF within 30 days
for NDOH for the purpose of speed post/self delivery to the accused.
Let summons be issued through all e modes/digital mode also on filing of email
ID, whatsapp number, messaging application of the accused on affidavit alongwith PF and
verification of the said particulars.
Complainant is directed to file Tracking Report on NDOH.
Complainant is also given an opportunity to file fresh address of accused
alongwith affidavit of physical verification alongwith Google location of verification and
photographs of the house.
Time to follow strictly.
Matter be put up for appearance of accused/furnishing of Bail Bond on
10.02.2027.
(Snehil Sharma)
Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
PHC/New Delhi/06.04.2026
-- 15 of 18 --
51 CC NI ACT/27491/2026 IPL Biologicals Ltd Vs M/s Sri Veerbhadreshwara Trading
Corporation Through Proprietor
06.04.2026
(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex)
Fresh case received. It be checked and registered.
Long date is given as this court has pendency of over 33000 cases.
Present: Sh. Anupam Kumar Jha, ld. counsel for the complainant.
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
In view of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India titled as Sanjabij Tari
Vs. Kishore S Borcar, the notice u/s 223 BNSS need not be issued to proposed
accused before taking the cognizance.
1. Arguments on behalf of the complainant heard on point of cognizance as well as
summoning.
2. Present complaint is filed alleging that accused had issued the cheque(s) bearing No.
243626 of Canara Bank to the complainant to discharge his/ her legal liability which got
dishonored. Thereafter, complainant sent a legal demand notice and despite service of the same,
accused failed to make the payment and thereby complainant prays to take cognizance
U/Sec.142 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881/25 PASSA Act 2007.
3. After considering the present complaint, attached documents and the evidence of
complainant by way of affidavit which is considered qua the requirement of section 202 of
Cr.PC, I am of the view that Prima facie case is made out for the offence U/Sec. 138 of NI
Act,1881/25 PASSA Act 2007 therefore, I take the cognizance in the present case for the
offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of NI Act,1881/ 25 PASSA Act 2007.This court is of further
opinion that
prima facie there is sufficient material to proceed against the accused.
4 Dasti summons be issued against the accused M/s Sri Veerbhadreshwara Trading
Corporation Through Proprietor K. Veeranna (signatory to the cheque) on filing of PF within
30 days for NDOH for the purpose of speed post/self delivery to the accused.
Let summons be issued through all e modes/digital mode also on filing of email
ID, whatsapp number, messaging application of the accused on affidavit alongwith PF and
verification of the said particulars.
Complainant is directed to file Tracking Report on NDOH.
Complainant is also given an opportunity to file fresh address of accused
alongwith affidavit of physical verification alongwith Google location of verification and
photographs of the house.
Time to follow strictly.
Matter be put up for appearance of accused/furnishing of Bail Bond on
10.02.2027.
(Snehil Sharma)
Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
PHC/New Delhi/06.04.2026
-- 16 of 18 --
43 CC NI ACT/27471/2026 GMR League Games Private Limited Vs SF Healthtec Private
Limited
41 CC NI ACT/27465/2026 ONKARA BEVERAGES AND HOSPITALITY PRIVATE
LIMITED Vs Nirmal
(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex)
Fresh case received. It be checked and registered.
Parcha.
Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 32000 cases.
Present: Sh. Pulkit Mehta, ld. counsel for the complainant.
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
Physical file has not yet been filed by the complainant.
No original documents are shown which are necessary for the purpose of
summoning, to ascertain that complainant is the holder of the cheque/mandate, to
ascertain that e-filed documents are the genuine one and not the forged/self made and
to avoid the duplicacy of the proceedings.
Put up for consideration on 14.10.2027.
(Snehil Sharma)
Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
PHC/New Delhi/06.04.2026
-- 17 of 18 --
37 CC NI ACT/27455/2026 GREENLAM INDUSTRIES LTD Vs THIRUMALAI
LAMINATES
45 CC NI ACT/27482/2026 Corteva Agriscience India Pvt Ltd Vs M/s Urbara
(Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex)
Fresh case received. It be checked and registered.
Parcha.
Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 32000 cases.
Present: Ld. counsel for the complainant.
Matter is at the stage of consideration.
Physical file has not yet been filed by the complainant.
No original documents are shown which are necessary for the purpose of
summoning, to ascertain that complainant is the holder of the cheque/mandate, to
ascertain that e-filed documents are the genuine one and not the forged/self made and
to avoid the duplicacy of the proceedings.
Put up for consideration on 18.05.2026
(Snehil Sharma)
Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
PHC/New Delhi/06.04.2026
-- 18 of 18 --