Skip to main content
CC NI ACT - Complaint Case 138 NI Act

Kotak Mahindra Prime LimitedVsSANDEEP D

CNR DLND02028158202378-Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI ACT)-01
PENDING

TrustJury record updated 11 Oct 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
14842/2023
Registration Date
19 Sept 2023
Next Hearing Date
10 Nov 2027
Case Stage
Notice

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Acts & Sections

    1
    NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT · Sec 138

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 19-09-2023
    Business: adjounred
    Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance
    Next Hearing Date: 19-12-2023
    
    Date: 19-12-2023
    Business: d
    Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance
    Next Hearing Date: 02-04-2024
    
    Date: 02-04-2024
    Business: l
    Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance
    Next Hearing Date: 01-10-2024
    
    Date: 01-10-2024
    Business: c
    Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance
    Next Hearing Date: 17-04-2025
    
    Date: 17-04-2025
    Business: U
    Reason For Adjournment: Accused Absent
    Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance
    Next Hearing Date: 17-10-2025
    
    Date: 17-10-2025
    Business: h
    Reason For Adjournment: Accused Absent
    Next Purpose: Notice
    Next Hearing Date: 20-07-2026
    
    Date: 20-07-2026
    Business: g
    Reason For Adjournment: Accused Absent
    Next Purpose: Notice
    Next Hearing Date: 10-11-2027

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 28132/2023
    Filing Date: 18-09-2023
    eFiling Number: ECDLND02174362023
    eFiling Date: 18-09-2023
    First Hearing Date: 19th September 2023
    Court Number And Judge: 78-Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI ACT)-01

    Orders

    8
    Interim Order 5
    17 Oct 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: 13 CC NI ACT 14842/2023 KOTAK MAHINDRA PRIME LIMITED Vs.
    SANDEEP D /0 ()
    17.10.2025
    (Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex)
    Present: Sh. Ashok Pratap, ld. counsel for the complainant.
    Matter is at the stage of appearance of accused.
    BW issued against the accused received back with the report that
    his brother has met the process executor.
    Let NBWs be issued against accused on filing of PF within 30
    working days, through SHO concerned returnable for NDOH
    Put up for framing of notice on 20.07.2026.
    (Snehil Sharma)
    Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
    PHC/New Delhi/17.10.2025
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 4
    17 Apr 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: CC No.14602/2023, 14842/23
    17.04.2025
    Matter taken up through hybrid hearing.
    Present : Sh. Ashok Pratap, Ld. Counsel for the complainant
    through VC.
    Report of Bailable warrants not received back.
    Let fresh Bailable Warrants be issued against the
    accused in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- with one surety of like
    amount (on filing of PF within 02 weeks from today) through
    SHO concerned, returnable on 17.10.2025.
    (Poonam Singh)
    Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
    PHC/New Delhi/17.04.2025
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 2
    01 Oct 2024
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: CC No.14842/2023
    01.10.2024
    Matter taken up through hybrid hearing.
    Present : Sh Ashok Pratap, Ld.proxy Counsel for the
    complainant through VC.
    Summons received back
    ‘duly served through
    affixation’. However, despite service, none has appeared on
    behalf of the accused.
    Ld.proxy counsel for the complainant requests for
    the issuance of warrants to secure the presence of the accused.
    In view of the absence of the accused despite service
    of summons, this court is satisfied that the presence of the
    accused can be secured by resorting to coercive means.
    Accordingly, let Bailable Warrants be issued against
    the accused in the sum of Rs.10,000/- with one surety in the like
    amount, through SHO concerned on filing of PF within 15
    working days from today.
    Non-filing of PF within the stipulated time shall be
    viewed strictly by the Court and may result in dismissal of
    complaint u/S 204(4) Cr.P.C.
    Be put up for report / appearance of the accused on
    17.04.2025.
    (Poonam Singh)
    Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
    PHC/New Delhi/01.10.2024
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 1Full order available
    02 Apr 2024

    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: CC No. 14842/23 KOTAK MAHINDRA PRIME LIMITED Vs. SANDEEP D 02.04.2024 Matter taken up through hybrid hearing. Present : Sh. Gaurav Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the complainant alongwith AR through VC. Complete case file alongwith original documents as well as PSE affidavit of the complainant has been filed. The present complaint is filed for the offence punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The Complaint is filed within limitation and is…

    Read Full Order
    Order 5
    17 Oct 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: 13 CC NI ACT 14842/2023 KOTAK MAHINDRA PRIME LIMITED Vs.
    SANDEEP D /0 ()
    17.10.2025
    (Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex)
    Present: Sh. Ashok Pratap, ld. counsel for the complainant.
    Matter is at the stage of appearance of accused.
    BW issued against the accused received back with the report that
    his brother has met the process executor.
    Let NBWs be issued against accused on filing of PF within 30
    working days, through SHO concerned returnable for NDOH
    Put up for framing of notice on 20.07.2026.
    (Snehil Sharma)
    Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
    PHC/New Delhi/17.10.2025
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Order 4
    17 Apr 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: CC No.14602/2023, 14842/23
    17.04.2025
    Matter taken up through hybrid hearing.
    Present : Sh. Ashok Pratap, Ld. Counsel for the complainant
    through VC.
    Report of Bailable warrants not received back.
    Let fresh Bailable Warrants be issued against the
    accused in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- with one surety of like
    amount (on filing of PF within 02 weeks from today) through
    SHO concerned, returnable on 17.10.2025.
    (Poonam Singh)
    Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
    PHC/New Delhi/17.04.2025
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Order 2
    01 Oct 2024
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: CC No.14842/2023
    01.10.2024
    Matter taken up through hybrid hearing.
    Present : Sh Ashok Pratap, Ld.proxy Counsel for the
    complainant through VC.
    Summons received back
    ‘duly served through
    affixation’. However, despite service, none has appeared on
    behalf of the accused.
    Ld.proxy counsel for the complainant requests for
    the issuance of warrants to secure the presence of the accused.
    In view of the absence of the accused despite service
    of summons, this court is satisfied that the presence of the
    accused can be secured by resorting to coercive means.
    Accordingly, let Bailable Warrants be issued against
    the accused in the sum of Rs.10,000/- with one surety in the like
    amount, through SHO concerned on filing of PF within 15
    working days from today.
    Non-filing of PF within the stipulated time shall be
    viewed strictly by the Court and may result in dismissal of
    complaint u/S 204(4) Cr.P.C.
    Be put up for report / appearance of the accused on
    17.04.2025.
    (Poonam Singh)
    Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01
    PHC/New Delhi/01.10.2024
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Order 1Full order available
    02 Apr 2024

    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: CC No. 14842/23 KOTAK MAHINDRA PRIME LIMITED Vs. SANDEEP D 02.04.2024 Matter taken up through hybrid hearing. Present : Sh. Gaurav Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the complainant alongwith AR through VC. Complete case file alongwith original documents as well as PSE affidavit of the complainant has been filed. The present complaint is filed for the offence punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The Complaint is filed within limitation and is…

    Read Full Order

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.