Full Order Text
Order 1 · 10 Mar 2026 · CNR DLND020258342026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 1 CC NI ACT/22371/2026 Rishabh Sharma Through SPA holder Megha Sharma Vs Baljit Rai Sachdeva 2 CC NI ACT/22373/2026 Megha Sharma Vs Baljit Rai Sachdeva 10 CC NI ACT/22381/2026 Ms Aye Finance Limited Vs OMVIR SINGH 12 CC NI ACT/22385/2026 SAFEXPRESS PRIVATE LIMITED Vs BDEL WELLNESS PRIVATE LIMITE 13 CC NI ACT/22388/2026 GULZAR Vs RAJESH KUMAR 18 CC NI ACT/22393/2026 MARVEL GDC PRIVATE LIMITED Vs JMD TEXTILES 21 CC NI ACT/22398/2026 BCH ELECTRIC LIMITED Vs JITENDER SINGH SOLE PROP OF NISHANT ENGINEERS 10.03.2026 (Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex) Parcha. Fresh case received. It be checked and registered. Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 32000 cases. Present: None. Matter is at the stage of consideration. Physical file has not yet been filed by the complainant. No original documents are shown which are necessary for the purpose of summoning, to ascertain that complainant is the holder of the cheque/mandate, to ascertain that e-filed documents are the genuine one and not the forged/self made and to avoid the duplicacy of the proceedings. Put up for consideration on 15.07.2027. (Snehil Sharma) Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01 PHC/New Delhi/10.03.2026 -- 1 of 18 -- 22 CC NI ACT/22399/2026 BLUE SKY BOOKS INTERNATIONAL Vs M/S KRISHNA BOOK AGENCY 23 CC NI ACT/22400/2026 BLUE SKY BOOKS INTERNATIONAL Vs JAYANT KUMAR SINGH 25 CC NI ACT/22402/2026 HPL Electric And Power Ltd Through Its Authorised Representative Vs Thankaraj Chandra Mohan proprietor of S C M Agency 26 CC NI ACT/22403/2026 VIVEK YADAV Vs KARAM PAL 29 CC NI ACT/22406/2026 BIG GUY LOGISTICS AND EXPRESS SERVICES PVT LTD AND ORS Vs PREM KUMAR RAWAT 30 CC NI ACT/22407/2026 HPL Electric And Power Ltd Through Its Authorised Representative Vs Gaurav Sethi proprietor of Sethi Electricals 10.03.2026 (Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex) Parcha. Fresh case received. It be checked and registered. Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 32000 cases. Present: None. Matter is at the stage of consideration. Physical file has not yet been filed by the complainant. No original documents are shown which are necessary for the purpose of summoning, to ascertain that complainant is the holder of the cheque/mandate, to ascertain that e-filed documents are the genuine one and not the forged/self made and to avoid the duplicacy of the proceedings. Put up for consideration on 15.07.2027. (Snehil Sharma) Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01 PHC/New Delhi/10.03.2026 -- 2 of 18 -- 7 CC NI ACT/22378/2026 FLOWMORE LIMITED Vs ASIAN SWITCHGEAR PRIVATE LIMITED 10.03.2026 (Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex) Fresh case received. It be checked and registered. Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 32000 cases. Present: Ms. Pratishtha Vij, ld. counsel for the complainant with AR. Matter is at the stage of consideration. In view of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India titled as Sanjabij Tari Vs. Kishore S Borcar, the notice u/s 223 BNSS need not be issued to proposed accused before taking the cognizance. 1. Arguments on behalf of the complainant heard on point of cognizance as well as summoning. 2. Present complaint is filed alleging that accused had issued the cheque(s) bearing No. 094246 of Federal Bank to the complainant to discharge his/ her legal liability which got dishonored. Thereafter, complainant sent a legal demand notice and despite service of the same, accused failed to make the payment and thereby complainant prays to take cognizance U/Sec.142 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881/25 PASSA Act 2007. 3. After considering the present complaint, attached documents and the evidence of complainant by way of affidavit which is considered qua the requirement of section 202 of Cr.PC, I am of the view that Prima facie case is made out for the offence U/Sec. 138 of NI Act,1881/25 PASSA Act 2007 therefore, I take the cognizance in the present case for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of NI Act,1881/ 25 PASSA Act 2007.This court is of further opinion that prima facie there is sufficient material to proceed against the accused. 4 Dasti summons be issued against the accused ASIAN SWITCHGEAR PRIVATE LIMITED., Abhishek, Avdesh (signatory to the cheque as well as Director) on filing of PF within 30 days for NDOH for the purpose of speed post/self delivery to the accused. Let summons be issued through all e modes/digital mode also on filing of email ID, whatsapp number, messaging application of the accused on affidavit alongwith PF and verification of the said particulars. Complainant is directed to file Tracking Report on NDOH. Complainant is also given an opportunity to file fresh address of accused alongwith affidavit of physical verification alongwith Google location of verification and photographs of the house. Time to follow strictly. Matter be put up for appearance of accused/furnishing of Bail Bond on 19.09.2026 (Snehil Sharma) Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01 PHC/New Delhi/10.03.2026 -- 3 of 18 -- 8 CC NI ACT/22379/2026 FLOWMORE LIMITED Vs ASIAN SWITCHGEAR PRIVATE LIMITED 10.03.2026 (Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex) Fresh case received. It be checked and registered. Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 32000 cases. Present: Ms. Pratishtha Vij, ld. counsel for the complainant with AR. Matter is at the stage of consideration. In view of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India titled as Sanjabij Tari Vs. Kishore S Borcar, the notice u/s 223 BNSS need not be issued to proposed accused before taking the cognizance. 1. Arguments on behalf of the complainant heard on point of cognizance as well as summoning. 2. Present complaint is filed alleging that accused had issued the cheque(s) bearing No. 094245 of Federal Bank to the complainant to discharge his/ her legal liability which got dishonored. Thereafter, complainant sent a legal demand notice and despite service of the same, accused failed to make the payment and thereby complainant prays to take cognizance U/Sec.142 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881/25 PASSA Act 2007. 3. After considering the present complaint, attached documents and the evidence of complainant by way of affidavit which is considered qua the requirement of section 202 of Cr.PC, I am of the view that Prima facie case is made out for the offence U/Sec. 138 of NI Act,1881/25 PASSA Act 2007 therefore, I take the cognizance in the present case for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of NI Act,1881/ 25 PASSA Act 2007.This court is of further opinion that prima facie there is sufficient material to proceed against the accused. 4 Dasti summons be issued against the accused ASIAN SWITCHGEAR PRIVATE LIMITED., Abhishek, Avdesh (signatory to the cheque as well as Director) on filing of PF within 30 days for NDOH for the purpose of speed post/self delivery to the accused. Let summons be issued through all e modes/digital mode also on filing of email ID, whatsapp number, messaging application of the accused on affidavit alongwith PF and verification of the said particulars. Complainant is directed to file Tracking Report on NDOH. Complainant is also given an opportunity to file fresh address of accused alongwith affidavit of physical verification alongwith Google location of verification and photographs of the house. Time to follow strictly. Matter be put up for appearance of accused/furnishing of Bail Bond on 19.09.2026 (Snehil Sharma) Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01 PHC/New Delhi/10.03.2026 -- 4 of 18 -- 27 CC NI ACT/22404/2026 FLOWMORE LIMITED Vs ASIAN SWITCHGEAR PRIVATE LIMITED. 10.03.2026 (Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex) Fresh case received. It be checked and registered. Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 32000 cases. Present: Ms. Pratishtha Vij, ld. counsel for the complainant with AR. Matter is at the stage of consideration. In view of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India titled as Sanjabij Tari Vs. Kishore S Borcar, the notice u/s 223 BNSS need not be issued to proposed accused before taking the cognizance. 1. Arguments on behalf of the complainant heard on point of cognizance as well as summoning. 2. Present complaint is filed alleging that accused had issued the cheque(s) bearing No. 094244 of Federal Bank to the complainant to discharge his/ her legal liability which got dishonored. Thereafter, complainant sent a legal demand notice and despite service of the same, accused failed to make the payment and thereby complainant prays to take cognizance U/Sec.142 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881/25 PASSA Act 2007. 3. After considering the present complaint, attached documents and the evidence of complainant by way of affidavit which is considered qua the requirement of section 202 of Cr.PC, I am of the view that Prima facie case is made out for the offence U/Sec. 138 of NI Act,1881/25 PASSA Act 2007 therefore, I take the cognizance in the present case for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of NI Act,1881/ 25 PASSA Act 2007.This court is of further opinion that prima facie there is sufficient material to proceed against the accused. 4 Dasti summons be issued against the accused ASIAN SWITCHGEAR PRIVATE LIMITED., Abhishek, Avdesh (signatory to the cheque as well as Director) on filing of PF within 30 days for NDOH for the purpose of speed post/self delivery to the accused. Let summons be issued through all e modes/digital mode also on filing of email ID, whatsapp number, messaging application of the accused on affidavit alongwith PF and verification of the said particulars. Complainant is directed to file Tracking Report on NDOH. Complainant is also given an opportunity to file fresh address of accused alongwith affidavit of physical verification alongwith Google location of verification and photographs of the house. Time to follow strictly. Matter be put up for appearance of accused/furnishing of Bail Bond on 19.09.2026 (Snehil Sharma) Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01 PHC/New Delhi/10.03.2026 -- 5 of 18 -- 11 CC NI ACT/22382/2026 PPG ASIAN PAINTS PVT LTD Vs SANJAY MOTORS PRIVATE LIMITED AND ORS 10.03.2026 (Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex) Fresh case received. It be checked and registered. Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 32000 cases. Present: Sh. Piyush, ld. counsel for the complainant. Matter is at the stage of consideration. In view of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India titled as Sanjabij Tari Vs. Kishore S Borcar, the notice u/s 223 BNSS need not be issued to proposed accused before taking the cognizance. 1. Arguments on behalf of the complainant heard on point of cognizance as well as summoning. 2. Present complaint is filed alleging that accused had issued the cheque(s) bearing No. 009788 of Federal Bank to the complainant to discharge his/ her legal liability which got dishonored. Thereafter, complainant sent a legal demand notice and despite service of the same, accused failed to make the payment and thereby complainant prays to take cognizance U/Sec.142 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881/25 PASSA Act 2007. 3. After considering the present complaint, attached documents and the evidence of complainant by way of affidavit which is considered qua the requirement of section 202 of Cr.PC, I am of the view that Prima facie case is made out for the offence U/Sec. 138 of NI Act,1881/25 PASSA Act 2007 therefore, I take the cognizance in the present case for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of NI Act,1881/ 25 PASSA Act 2007.This court is of further opinion that prima facie there is sufficient material to proceed against the accused. 4 Dasti summons be issued against the accused Sanjay Motors, Ajay Bansal and Sapna Bansal (signatory to the cheque as well as Director) on filing of PF within 30 days for NDOH for the purpose of speed post/self delivery to the accused. Let summons be issued through all e modes/digital mode also on filing of email ID, whatsapp number, messaging application of the accused on affidavit alongwith PF and verification of the said particulars. Complainant is directed to file Tracking Report on NDOH. Complainant is also given an opportunity to file fresh address of accused alongwith affidavit of physical verification alongwith Google location of verification and photographs of the house. Time to follow strictly. Matter be put up for appearance of accused/furnishing of Bail Bond on 19.09.2026. (Snehil Sharma) Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01 PHC/New Delhi/10.03.2026 -- 6 of 18 -- 4 CC NI ACT/22375/2026 Hindustan Media Ventures Limited Vs M/s Shivam Associates Through its Proprietor Mr Neeraj Mahajan 10.03.2026 (Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex) Fresh case received. It be checked and registered. Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 32000 cases. Present: Ms. Preeti and Ms. Rashmi Mishra, ld. counsel for the complainant. Matter is at the stage of consideration. In view of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India titled as Sanjabij Tari Vs. Kishore S Borcar, the notice u/s 223 BNSS need not be issued to proposed accused before taking the cognizance. 1. Arguments on behalf of the complainant heard on point of cognizance as well as summoning. 2. Present complaint is filed alleging that accused had issued the cheque(s) bearing No. 116788 of Canara Bank to the complainant to discharge his/ her legal liability which got dishonored. Thereafter, complainant sent a legal demand notice and despite service of the same, accused failed to make the payment and thereby complainant prays to take cognizance U/Sec.142 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881/25 PASSA Act 2007. 3. After considering the present complaint, attached documents and the evidence of complainant by way of affidavit which is considered qua the requirement of section 202 of Cr.PC, I am of the view that Prima facie case is made out for the offence U/Sec. 138 of NI Act,1881/25 PASSA Act 2007 therefore, I take the cognizance in the present case for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of NI Act,1881/ 25 PASSA Act 2007.This court is of further opinion that prima facie there is sufficient material to proceed against the accused. 4 Dasti summons be issued against the accusedM/s Shivam Associates Through its Proprietor Mr Neeraj Mahajan (signatory to the cheque) on filing of PF within 30 days for NDOH for the purpose of speed post/self delivery to the accused. Let summons be issued through all e modes/digital mode also on filing of email ID, whatsapp number, messaging application of the accused on affidavit alongwith PF and verification of the said particulars. Complainant is directed to file Tracking Report on NDOH. Complainant is also given an opportunity to file fresh address of accused alongwith affidavit of physical verification alongwith Google location of verification and photographs of the house. Time to follow strictly. Matter be put up for appearance of accused/furnishing of Bail Bond on 19.09.2026. (Snehil Sharma) Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01 PHC/New Delhi/10.03.2026 -- 7 of 18 -- 5 CC NI ACT/22376/2026 Hindustan Media Ventures Limited Vs M/s Shivam Associates Through its Proprietor Mr Neeraj Mahajan 10.03.2026 (Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex) Fresh case received. It be checked and registered. Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 32000 cases. Present: Ms. Preeti and Ms. Rashmi, ld. counsel for the complainant. Matter is at the stage of consideration. In view of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India titled as Sanjabij Tari Vs. Kishore S Borcar, the notice u/s 223 BNSS need not be issued to proposed accused before taking the cognizance. 1. Arguments on behalf of the complainant heard on point of cognizance as well as summoning. 2. Present complaint is filed alleging that accused had issued the cheque(s) bearing No. 116792 of Canara Bank to the complainant to discharge his/ her legal liability which got dishonored. Thereafter, complainant sent a legal demand notice and despite service of the same, accused failed to make the payment and thereby complainant prays to take cognizance U/Sec.142 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881/25 PASSA Act 2007. 3. After considering the present complaint, attached documents and the evidence of complainant by way of affidavit which is considered qua the requirement of section 202 of Cr.PC, I am of the view that Prima facie case is made out for the offence U/Sec. 138 of NI Act,1881/25 PASSA Act 2007 therefore, I take the cognizance in the present case for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of NI Act,1881/ 25 PASSA Act 2007.This court is of further opinion that prima facie there is sufficient material to proceed against the accused. 4 Dasti summons be issued against the accused M/s Shivam Associates Through its Proprietor Mr Neeraj Mahajan (signatory to the cheque) on filing of PF within 30 days for NDOH for the purpose of speed post/self delivery to the accused. Let summons be issued through all e modes/digital mode also on filing of email ID, whatsapp number, messaging application of the accused on affidavit alongwith PF and verification of the said particulars. Complainant is directed to file Tracking Report on NDOH. Complainant is also given an opportunity to file fresh address of accused alongwith affidavit of physical verification alongwith Google location of verification and photographs of the house. Time to follow strictly. Matter be put up for appearance of accused/furnishing of Bail Bond on 19.09.2026. (Snehil Sharma) Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01 PHC/New Delhi/10.03.2026 -- 8 of 18 -- 6 CC NI ACT/22377/2026 CORDS CABLE INDUSTRIES LIMITED Vs M/s R K Enterprises 10.03.2026 (Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex) Fresh case received. It be checked and registered. Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 32000 cases. Present: Ms. Preeti and Ms. Rashmi, ld. counsel for the complainant. Matter is at the stage of consideration. In view of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India titled as Sanjabij Tari Vs. Kishore S Borcar, the notice u/s 223 BNSS need not be issued to proposed accused before taking the cognizance. 1. Arguments on behalf of the complainant heard on point of cognizance as well as summoning. 2. Present complaint is filed alleging that accused had issued the cheque(s) bearing No. 000126 of HDFC Bank to the complainant to discharge his/ her legal liability which got dishonored. Thereafter, complainant sent a legal demand notice and despite service of the same, accused failed to make the payment and thereby complainant prays to take cognizance U/Sec.142 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881/25 PASSA Act 2007. 3. After considering the present complaint, attached documents and the evidence of complainant by way of affidavit which is considered qua the requirement of section 202 of Cr.PC, I am of the view that Prima facie case is made out for the offence U/Sec. 138 of NI Act,1881/25 PASSA Act 2007 therefore, I take the cognizance in the present case for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of NI Act,1881/ 25 PASSA Act 2007.This court is of further opinion that prima facie there is sufficient material to proceed against the accused. 4 Dasti summons be issued against the accused M/s R K Enterprises prop. Rinku (signatory to the cheque) on filing of PF within 30 days for NDOH for the purpose of speed post/self delivery to the accused. Let summons be issued through all e modes/digital mode also on filing of email ID, whatsapp number, messaging application of the accused on affidavit alongwith PF and verification of the said particulars. Complainant is directed to file Tracking Report on NDOH. Complainant is also given an opportunity to file fresh address of accused alongwith affidavit of physical verification alongwith Google location of verification and photographs of the house. Time to follow strictly. Matter be put up for appearance of accused/furnishing of Bail Bond on 19.09.2026. (Snehil Sharma) Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01 PHC/New Delhi/10.03.2026 -- 9 of 18 -- 14 CC NI ACT/22389/2026 Balvinder Singh Kapoor Vs Village Food Court Pvt Ltd 10.03.2026 (Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex) Fresh case received. It be checked and registered. Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 32000 cases. Present: Sh. Ashneet Singh and SH. Abhishek, ld. counsel for the complainant. Matter is at the stage of consideration. In view of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India titled as Sanjabij Tari Vs. Kishore S Borcar, the notice u/s 223 BNSS need not be issued to proposed accused before taking the cognizance. 1. Arguments on behalf of the complainant heard on point of cognizance as well as summoning. 2. Present complaint is filed alleging that accused had issued the cheque(s) bearing No. 000072 of Kotak Mahindra Bank to the complainant to discharge his/ her legal liability which got dishonored. Thereafter, complainant sent a legal demand notice and despite service of the same, accused failed to make the payment and thereby complainant prays to take cognizance U/Sec.142 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881/25 PASSA Act 2007. 3. After considering the present complaint, attached documents and the evidence of complainant by way of affidavit which is considered qua the requirement of section 202 of Cr.PC, I am of the view that Prima facie case is made out for the offence U/Sec. 138 of NI Act,1881/25 PASSA Act 2007 therefore, I take the cognizance in the present case for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of NI Act,1881/ 25 PASSA Act 2007.This court is of further opinion that prima facie there is sufficient material to proceed against the accused. 4 Dasti summons be issued against the accused Village Foods Court Pvt. Ltd., Deepak and Suraj (signatory to the cheque as well as Director) on filing of PF within 30 days for NDOH for the purpose of speed post/self delivery to the accused. Let summons be issued through all e modes/digital mode also on filing of email ID, whatsapp number, messaging application of the accused on affidavit alongwith PF and verification of the said particulars. Complainant is directed to file Tracking Report on NDOH. Complainant is also given an opportunity to file fresh address of accused alongwith affidavit of physical verification alongwith Google location of verification and photographs of the house. Time to follow strictly. Matter be put up for appearance of accused/furnishing of Bail Bond on 29.05.2026 (Snehil Sharma) Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01 PHC/New Delhi/10.03.2026 -- 10 of 18 -- 15 CC NI ACT/22390/2026 Balvinder Singh Kapoor Vs Village Food Court Pvt Ltd 10.03.2026 (Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex) Fresh case received. It be checked and registered. Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 32000 cases. Present: Sh. Ashneet Singh and SH. Abhishek, ld. counsel for the complainant. Matter is at the stage of consideration. In view of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India titled as Sanjabij Tari Vs. Kishore S Borcar, the notice u/s 223 BNSS need not be issued to proposed accused before taking the cognizance. 1. Arguments on behalf of the complainant heard on point of cognizance as well as summoning. 2. Present complaint is filed alleging that accused had issued the cheque(s) bearing No. 000073 of Kotak Mahindra Bank to the complainant to discharge his/ her legal liability which got dishonored. Thereafter, complainant sent a legal demand notice and despite service of the same, accused failed to make the payment and thereby complainant prays to take cognizance U/Sec.142 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881/25 PASSA Act 2007. 3. After considering the present complaint, attached documents and the evidence of complainant by way of affidavit which is considered qua the requirement of section 202 of Cr.PC, I am of the view that Prima facie case is made out for the offence U/Sec. 138 of NI Act,1881/25 PASSA Act 2007 therefore, I take the cognizance in the present case for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of NI Act,1881/ 25 PASSA Act 2007.This court is of further opinion that prima facie there is sufficient material to proceed against the accused. 4 Dasti summons be issued against the accused Village Foods Court Pvt. Ltd., Deepak and Suraj (signatory to the cheque as well as Director) on filing of PF within 30 days for NDOH for the purpose of speed post/self delivery to the accused. Let summons be issued through all e modes/digital mode also on filing of email ID, whatsapp number, messaging application of the accused on affidavit alongwith PF and verification of the said particulars. Complainant is directed to file Tracking Report on NDOH. Complainant is also given an opportunity to file fresh address of accused alongwith affidavit of physical verification alongwith Google location of verification and photographs of the house. Time to follow strictly. Matter be put up for appearance of accused/furnishing of Bail Bond on 29.05.2026 (Snehil Sharma) Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01 PHC/New Delhi/10.03.2026 -- 11 of 18 -- 24 CC NI ACT/22401/2026 BIO RESURGE LIFE COACHING HEALTH SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED Vs AYUSH AUSHDHALAYA Through its Proprietor Ms Monika Goel 10.03.2026 (Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex) Fresh case received. It be checked and registered. Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 32000 cases. Present: Sh. Sunil Kumar Tiwari, ld. counsel for the complainant. Matter is at the stage of consideration. In view of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India titled as Sanjabij Tari Vs. Kishore S Borcar, the notice u/s 223 BNSS need not be issued to proposed accused before taking the cognizance. 1. Arguments on behalf of the complainant heard on point of cognizance as well as summoning. 2. Present complaint is filed alleging that accused had issued the cheque(s) bearing No. 000041 of Kotak Mahindra Bank to the complainant to discharge his/ her legal liability which got dishonored. Thereafter, complainant sent a legal demand notice and despite service of the same, accused failed to make the payment and thereby complainant prays to take cognizance U/Sec.142 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881/25 PASSA Act 2007. 3. After considering the present complaint, attached documents and the evidence of complainant by way of affidavit which is considered qua the requirement of section 202 of Cr.PC, I am of the view that Prima facie case is made out for the offence U/Sec. 138 of NI Act,1881/25 PASSA Act 2007 therefore, I take the cognizance in the present case for the offence punishable U/Sec. 138 of NI Act,1881/ 25 PASSA Act 2007.This court is of further opinion that prima facie there is sufficient material to proceed against the accused. 4 Dasti summons be issued against the accused AYUSH AUSHDHALAYA Through its Proprietor Ms Monika Goel (signatory to the cheque) on filing of PF within 30 days for NDOH for the purpose of speed post/self delivery to the accused. Let summons be issued through all e modes/digital mode also on filing of email ID, whatsapp number, messaging application of the accused on affidavit alongwith PF and verification of the said particulars. Complainant is directed to file Tracking Report on NDOH. Complainant is also given an opportunity to file fresh address of accused alongwith affidavit of physical verification alongwith Google location of verification and photographs of the house. Time to follow strictly. Matter be put up for appearance of accused/furnishing of Bail Bond on 19.09.2026. (Snehil Sharma) Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01 PHC/New Delhi/10.03.2026 -- 12 of 18 -- 3 CC NI ACT/22374/2026 MR GIRISH AHUJA Vs Harsh Kumar Takkar 10.03.2026 (Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex) Parcha. Fresh case received. It be checked and registered. Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 32000 cases. Present: ld. counsel for the complainant. Matter is at the stage of consideration. Physical file has not yet been filed by the complainant. No original documents are shown which are necessary for the purpose of summoning, to ascertain that complainant is the holder of the cheque/mandate, to ascertain that e-filed documents are the genuine one and not the forged/self made and to avoid the duplicacy of the proceedings. Put up for consideration on 15.07.2027. (Snehil Sharma) Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01 PHC/New Delhi/10.03.2026 -- 13 of 18 -- 9 CC NI ACT/22380/2026 RECKON INDUSTRIES LIMITED Vs RAKESH CHAND GUPTA 10.03.2026 (Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex) Parcha. Fresh case received. It be checked and registered. Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 32000 cases. Present: ld. counsel for the complainant. Matter is at the stage of consideration. Physical file has not yet been filed by the complainant. No original documents are shown which are necessary for the purpose of summoning, to ascertain that complainant is the holder of the cheque/mandate, to ascertain that e-filed documents are the genuine one and not the forged/self made and to avoid the duplicacy of the proceedings. Put up for consideration on 07.07.2027. (Snehil Sharma) Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01 PHC/New Delhi/10.03.2026 -- 14 of 18 -- 16 CC NI ACT/22391/2026 ANUJ KHER Vs Panacea Institute Of Radiology and Medical Service Pvt Ltd 17 CC NI ACT/22392/2026 ANUJ KHER Vs Panacea Institute Of Radiology and Medical Service Pvt Ltd 10.03.2026 (Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex) Parcha. Fresh case received. It be checked and registered. Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 32000 cases. Present: ld. counsel for the complainant. Matter is at the stage of consideration. Physical file has not yet been filed by the complainant. No original documents are shown which are necessary for the purpose of summoning, to ascertain that complainant is the holder of the cheque/mandate, to ascertain that e-filed documents are the genuine one and not the forged/self made and to avoid the duplicacy of the proceedings. Put up for consideration on 18.05.2027 (Snehil Sharma) Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01 PHC/New Delhi/10.03.2026 -- 15 of 18 -- 19 CC NI ACT/22395/2026 Sanjay Sharma Vs Devendra Kumar 10.03.2026 (Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex) Parcha. Fresh case received. It be checked and registered. Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 32000 cases. Present: ld. counsel for the complainant. Matter is at the stage of consideration. Physical file has not yet been filed by the complainant. No original documents are shown which are necessary for the purpose of summoning, to ascertain that complainant is the holder of the cheque/mandate, to ascertain that e-filed documents are the genuine one and not the forged/self made and to avoid the duplicacy of the proceedings. Put up for consideration on 07.09.2027. (Snehil Sharma) Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01 PHC/New Delhi/10.03.2026 -- 16 of 18 -- 20 CC NI ACT/22397/2026 AEROTECH FMS PRIVATE LIMITED Vs PRADHAAN AIR EXPRESS PRIVATE LIMITED AND ORS 10.03.2026 (Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex) Parcha. Fresh case received. It be checked and registered. Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 32000 cases. Present: ld. counsel for the complainant. Matter is at the stage of consideration. Physical file has not yet been filed by the complainant. No original documents are shown which are necessary for the purpose of summoning, to ascertain that complainant is the holder of the cheque/mandate, to ascertain that e-filed documents are the genuine one and not the forged/self made and to avoid the duplicacy of the proceedings. Put up for consideration on 07.09.2027. (Snehil Sharma) Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01 PHC/New Delhi/10.03.2026 -- 17 of 18 -- 28 CC NI ACT/22405/2026 RECKON INDUSTRIES LIMITED Vs SHANTI PRAKASH 10.03.2026 (Also through VC Proceedings via CISCO Webex) Parcha. Fresh case received. It be checked and registered. Long date is given because this court has pendency of over 32000 cases. Present: ld. counsel for the complainant. Matter is at the stage of consideration. Physical file has not yet been filed by the complainant. No original documents are shown which are necessary for the purpose of summoning, to ascertain that complainant is the holder of the cheque/mandate, to ascertain that e-filed documents are the genuine one and not the forged/self made and to avoid the duplicacy of the proceedings. Put up for consideration on 07.07.2027. (Snehil Sharma) Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act) – 01 PHC/New Delhi/10.03.2026 -- 18 of 18 --
