Skip to main content
Court Order

Interim Order 6

CNR DLND02023556202310 Feb 2025
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Interim Order 6 · 10 Feb 2025 · CNR DLND020235562023

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 65 Ct Cases 2381/2023
AMAZING RESEARCH LABORATORIES LIMITED Vs. DEEPAK
BISWAL
10.02.2025
Present: Sh. Aruni Poddar, Counsel for complainant (through VC).
Sh. Sarat Behera, Counsel for the accused.
Accused present (through VC).
An application for substitution of AR of the complainant
moved by Ld. Counsel alongwith board resolution dt. 21.11.2024.
Heard. Documents perused. Application is allowed. Let Sh. Sarabpreet
Singh be substituted as the new AR of the complainant company and
all the other previous ARs be relieved as AR.
Ld. Counsel has filed evidentiary affidavit of the newly
substituted AR and CW-2 Arjun Sharma. Same be taken on record. Let
copy of the same be supplied to opposite side by NDOH.
The accused has appeared through VC and has expressed
inability in appearing before the Court today physically and he has
further submitted that the notice against him be framed through VC. In
the interest of justice and taking a lenient view of the matter, the
prayer of the accused is accepted and the Court has proceeded to
frame notice against the accused through VC.
(Nishi Jindal)
Judicial Magistrate First Class
(NI Act)-05/NDD/RACC
10.02.2025
-- 1 of 2 --
..2..
Notice u/s 251 Cr.P.C has been framed against the accused
(through VC) to which he pleaded not guilty and claimed trial. Plea
of defence has been separately recorded and explained to the accused.
Counsel for the accused has moved an oral application U/s.
145(2) NI Act. Same is considered and allowed in view of the fact
that an opportunity for cross examination of the complainant is fit to
be given to the accused u/s 145(2) NI Act. The need for filing a
formal application u/s 145(2) NI Act stands dispensed with. This
Court further does not deem it appropriate/desirable to try the case
summarily since sentence for imprisonment exceeding one year may
have to be passed, if the trial results in conviction, therefore, this case
would be tried as summons trial case.
Admission and denial of documents U/s. 294 Cr.P.C has
been done. In view of the same, witness mentioned at Sr. No. 3, 4, 5
& 6 in the list of witnesses filed by the complainant stands dropped.
At this stage, Counsel for accused seeks time to furnish bail
bonds. Let the same be furnished positively by NDOH.
Put up for cross examination of CW-1 / furnishing of bail
bonds on 21.04.2025.
Date is given as per convenience of both the parties.
(Nishi Jindal)
Judicial Magistrate First Class
(NI Act)-05/NDD/RACC
10.02.2025
-- 2 of 2 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.