Order 5

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CC No. 1900/2024
Gurmeet Kaur vs. B R Sharma
24.04.2025 @ 4:30 PM
Pr: 	None
1. 	Vide this order, I shall dispose off the application filed by the complainant
u/s 156(3) Cr.P.C. seeking registration of FIR.
2. 	Briefly 	stated, 	as 	per 	the 	complaint, 	on 	16.02.2024 	when 	the
complainant was in the vicinity of C-2 Vasant Kunj, New Delhi along with her friend
Captain Iqbal Singh, one man namely B R Sharma who is the advocate of Captain
Iqbal Singh’s wife Satvinder Kaur in their ongoing court cases, had abused the
complainant by using filthy words and had also given life threats to her.
3. 	Action taken report was filed by W/SI Kumari Neeraj as per which during the
course of the enquiry, it was found that the allegations levelled by the complainant
was concocted. She did not approach the police immediately after the incident and
filed complaint only after 9 days. In fact, the wife of Captain Iqbal Singh namely
Satvinder Kaur had also field complaint against the complainant on 04.03.2024.
4. 	I have perused the materials available on record and have heard Ld. Counsel
for the complainant.
5. 	In the judgment titled as Subhkaran Luharuka and Anr. Vs. State (Govt. of
NCT of Delhi) & anr., 2010 (3) JCC 1972 of Hon’ble High Court of Delhi, certain
guidelines were enumerated pertaining to applications u/s 156 (3) Cr.PC. One such
guideline is as follows:
“Of course, it is open to the Magistrate to proceed under
Chapter XII of the code when an application under Section
156 (3) of the Code is also filed alongwith a Complaint
under Section 200 of the Code if the Magistrate decides not
to take cognizance of the Complaint. However, in that case,
the Magistrate, before passing any order to proceed under
Chapter XII, should not only satisfy himself about the pre-
requisites as aforesaid, but, additionally, he should also be
satisfied that it is necessary to direct Police investigation in
the matter for collection of evidence which is neither in the
possession of the complainant nor can be produced by the
Page 	of	1 	3
-- 1 of 3 --
witnesses on being summoned by the Court at the instance
of 	complainant, 	and 	the 	matter 	is 	such 	which 	calls 	for
investigation by a State agency.
The Magistrate must pass an order giving cogent reasons
as to why he intends to proceed under Chapter XII instead
of Chapter XV of the Code.”
6. 	The complainant has relied upon the judgment of Lalita Kumari vs.
State of U.P., 2013 (6) CTC 353, however, the said judgment only deals with the
duties of the police and does not direct the Magistrate to order registration of FIR
under section 156 (3) Cr.PC in each and every case. It should be noted that
direction for registration of FIR U/s 156 (3) Cr.PC is a serious matter and cannot be
given in a mechanical manner. In Sukhwasi vs. State of U.P. 2007 (59) ACC 739,
it has been observed that the objective of the police investigation is collection of
evidence regarding the offence.
7. 	Therefore, police investigation is necessary only in those cases where
the evidence is neither in the possession of the complainant nor can be produced
by the witnesses on being summoned at the instance of the complainant or where
the nature of the evidence is technical. Further, in Vikrant Kapoor vs. State and
Anr. 2012 IV AD Delhi, it has been observed in the case where the complainant is
in possession of evidence to prove allegations, there should be no need to pass an
order u/s 156 (3) Cr.PC.
8. 	In the instant case, it should be noted the complainant is aware of the
witnesses who are to be examined and / or in possession of complete details of the
complaint / documents. The mode and manner in which the alleged offence is
stated to have been committed is clear. As per the submissions, identity of the
accused persons is known to the complainant. Thus, the complainant has brought
nothing on record to suggest as to what evidence is required to be collected
through police investigation.
9. 	Therefore, the offence committed, if any, may be proved by leading
evidence by the complainant himself. No active or passive assistance required from
the state machinery for investigation. Hence, there is no requirement of police
investigation in this case for the purpose of collection of evidence. The case, if any,
Page 	of	2 	3
-- 2 of 3 --
can be proved by the evidence of the complainant. If any further evidence would be
required, the same can be summoned by the court at the required stage u/s 202
Cr.PC.
10. 	Hence, in view of the above discussion, the present application filed u/s
156 (3) Cr.PC is dismissed.
11. 	Now to come up for PSE on 29.08.2025.
[ANIMESH KUMAR]
JMFC-02/PHC/NDD
24.04.2025
Page 	of	3 	3
-- 3 of 3 --