Interim Order 3

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CC NI ACT 5143-2021
KARAN SINGH TANWAR
versus
KASIMUDDIN
31.03.2022
Proceedings conducted through video conferencing on Cisco Webex platform using the URL
link https://delhidistrictcourts.webex.com/meet/ninewdelhi1.
Present: Complainant alongwith Sh. Nand Kishore, Ld. Counsel.
As reported by the Ahlmad, physical complaint and document have been
submitted.
Heard.
Perusal of record would consume considerable time. Hence, put up for order at
4 PM.
(RAJANI RANGA)
MM (NI Act), Digital Court-01
PHC/New Delhi/31.03.2022
Present: None.
1. I have perused the complaint, pre-summoning evidence by way of affidavit of
the complainant and the documents relied upon by the complainant. The present complaint
has been filed within the limitation/extended period of limitation (In Re Cognizance for
Extension of Limitation dated 08.03.2021 (Suo Moto Writ Petition (Civil) No.3/2020 and
miscellaneous application No. 665/2021) and is within the jurisdiction of this Court. The
complaint and the original documents have been submitted to the Ahlmad for safe custody.
The documents have been identified today in accordance with the pre-summoning evidence
by way of affidavit.
2. In light of the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in A.C. Narayanan v.
State of Maharashtra & Anr. (2014) 11 SCC 790, Full Bench, examination of the
complainant upon oath for issuance of process is a matter of discretion of the Magistrate. In
the considered opinion of this Court, there is no need to examine the complainant for the
purpose of issuance of process. There is sufficient material before this Court to proceed
against the accused. I hereby take cognizance of the offence under Section 138 of the NI
-- 1 of 2 --
Act.
3. Accordingly, issue summons to accused, Kasimuddin, for being the drawer
and the signatory to impugned cheques. The summons are to be sent upon filing of PF/RC
within one month from today, returnable on 01.08.2022. The complainant is directed to file
metadata form before filing of PF. The process server is directed to serve the summons by
way of affixation, if premises are found locked or same could not be served personally or on
any adult male member. To expedite service, the complainant is at liberty to serve the
summons through speed post/approved courier, subject to filing internet generated tracking
report of service on the next date of hearing. The complainant may also send summons
through email and WhatsApp to the accused and file the requisite affidavit of service along
with Certificate u/S 65B Evidence Act on the next date of hearing.
4. An endorsement be also made on the form for summons that if application for
compounding at first or second hearing is made, the Court may pass appropriate orders at the
earliest as per judgment of M/s Meters & Instruments (P) Ltd. v. Kanchan Mehta, (2018)
1 SCC 560 and if settlement is made at subsequent stages, the consequences as provided in
Damodar S. Prabhu v. Syed Babulal H; (2010) 5 SCC 663 shall be enforced.
5. The Ahlmad is directed to mention the official email id of the Court, the
URL link as well as the permanent meeting number of video conferencing through
CISCO Webex platform, on the form for issuance of summons. Complainant is directed to
file PF and provide copies of the complaint and other necessary documents, within one month
from today, failing which the complaint may be dismissed under Section 204(4), CrPC.
6. Renotify for appearance of the accused/furnishing of bail bonds/ consideration
on Notice under Section 251, CrPC on 01.08.2022.
(RAJANI RANGA)
MM (NI Act), Digital Court-01
PHC/New Delhi/31.03.2022
-- 2 of 2 --