Full Order Text
Interim Order 2 · 21 Jan 2025 · CNR DLND020125072024
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 56 Ct Cases 618/2024 Axis Trustee Services Ltd Vs. Saha Estate Developers Private Limited And Ors 21.01.2025 Present: Sh. Abhishek Sharma, Counsel for the complainant. Counsel for complainant has placed on record the MCA data. Same is taken on record. This complaint is filed U/s. 138 of NI Act. It is alleged in the complaint that the accused had issued cheque in favour of complainant in discharge of his liability. On presentation, the cheque was returned dishonured. Thereafter, the complainant made the demand for the payment of the cheque amount by giving the statutory notice. The accused failed to make the payment within the prescribed period of 15 days from the receipt of the demand notice. Complaint perused. Documents perused. I have perused the complaint, copy of authority letter in favour of AR of the complainant, the evidence by way of affidavit of the AR of the complainant and the documents relied upon by the complainant. The present complaint has been filed within the period of limitation and within the jurisdiction of this Court. The original documents have been exhibited in accordance with the pre summoning evidence by way of affidavit and the affidavit of evidence (Nishi Jindal) Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act)-05/NDD/RACC 21.01.2025 -- 1 of 2 -- ..2.. is Ex. CW1/X. As per the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in A.C. Narayanan Vs. State of Maharashtra and Anr. 2014 11 SCC 790 the examination of the complainant upon oath for issuance of process is a matter of discretion of the Magistrate. In the considered opinion of this Court, there is no need to examine the complaint for the purpose of issuance of process. There is sufficient material before this Court to proceed against the accused. I hereby take cognizance of the offence U/s. 138 of N.I. Act. Perusal of the record shows that accused no.1 is a registered company and accused no.2 is its Director. Record perused. Arguments heard. This Court is satisfied that only accused no.1, & 2 be summoned as accused persons as their involvement is evident and accused no.2 is involved in day-to-day affairs of accused no.1 and accused no.2 is also the signatory of impugned cheque and same has been issued on behalf of accused no.1. No role has been ascribed to accused no.3 & 4 except the fact that they are personal guarantors. Therefore, let summons be issued only to accused no.1 & 2 through all permitted modes including PF/RC, speed post, courier, affixation at the given address(es) on filing of PF within 10 days, returnable on 02.04.2025. (Nishi Jindal) Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act)-05/NDD/RACC 21.01.2025 -- 2 of 2 --
